For posts visible within the ‘Egyptian Chronology Resources’ section. (But I don’t want them to show on the Book of Mormon archaeology main page so I’m not putting it as a child under it.

Why the Giza Great Pyramid is a Mathematical Masterpiece (Pi, Phi & The Secrets Behind its Construction & Geometry)

Outline of points covered in the article
MANY OF THESE RELATIONSHIPS HAVE NEVER BEEN DISCOVERED IN MODERN TIME!
-The channeled text Oahspe gives an amazingly believable account of how the pyramids were built using wooden ramps & capstans.
-It also gives the Old Kingdom value for a cubit and describes a 2nd ‘base-11’ calendar the Old Kingdom used which make the 7/11 & 7/22 ratios in the pyramid more meaningful.
-The ‘magic ratio’ used to scale the earth to the pyramid suggests the spin axis has slowed 258 seconds since the pyramid was built. (Likely at the Moses catastrophe)
-Oahspe teaches of a global astronomical observatory network which is substantiated by archaeological findings (including Stonehenge, Newgrange and Caral, Peru);
-The pyramid encodes many different celestial distances and observations, such as the ratio of the earth’s circumferences and radius. As well as the distance to the moon and sun. As well as the acre, foot and mile.
-Since its construction, the Great Pyramid and its temple priests have been the heart of mathematics and astronomy. After the takeover of Egypt by the Greeks (Alexander the Great), that knowledge was passed on to the Greeks and Romans.
-The ‘Law of One’ gives a believable description of how the pyramids once funneled the earth’s electromagnetic field for initiation and healing.

.

The Great Pyramid is a Scaled Model of our Earth

If you multiply the Great pyramid’s dimensions by (43,200 or the number of seconds in a 1/2 day), you arrive at the dimensions of the Earth with startling accuracy. Evan more accurate is scaling by the number of square feet in an acre of 43,560, a number whose source has been lost to time, but undeniably is related to the same ancient concept of tying earth rotational speed (time) to distance (area).

Take the earth, chop it in half, set it on the ground and make the circle square but keep all the same dimensions… and you get the Great Pyramid. This angular structure can now be used to compute the size and distances of the moon, sun and stars with parallax, and an adjoining network of temples built at exactly the same latitude.

  1. The Height to Polar Radius: If you take the original height of the Great Pyramid (481.39 feet) and multiply it by 43,200, you get the polar radius of 3,938.6 miles (20,796,048 ft). Very close to an acre at 43,560 sq ft)
    • The Reality: The actual Polar Radius of the Earth is approximately 3,949 miles. The margin of error is less than 0.3%
  2. The Perimeter to Equatorial Circumference: If you take the perimeter of the base (3,023.1 feet) and multiply it by 43,200, you get the equatorial circumference 24,734 miles (131,479,713 ft).
    • The Reality: The actual Equatorial Circumference is approximately 24,901 miles. The margin of error is roughly 0.7%.

Keep reading to learn more absolutely amazing scale factors of the Great Pyramids. Things which prove that the builders of these structures knew the size of the earth as well as the distances to the Sun, Moon and other planets.

Some Background Information on Building of the Pyramid

Before detailing the math of how the Great pyramid models our earth, it may be helpful to first go through an overview of the history of the structures construction. The historical and esoteric records surrounding the construction of the Great Pyramid present a fascinating collision between classical historiography and modern metaphysical revelation. While the Greek historian Herodotus famously documented a labor force of 100,000 men and the use of ingenious “machines” made of short wooden planks to lift the stones, the Egyptian priest Manetho provided a chronological framework that linked these monuments to the “divine” dynasties of the Old Kingdom. In striking contrast, 19th-century channeled texts like the Oahspe describe the pyramid as a “Tabernacle of Knowledge” built through the intersection of mortal labor and celestial guidance, while the Law of One (The Ra Material) proposes a radical “thought-form” construction method, suggesting the stones were moved through the manipulation of gravity and vibration to create a healing prism for the planet. Together, these sources offer a spectrum of explanations—ranging from the purely mechanical to the hyper-dimensional—that frame the Great Pyramid not merely as a tomb, but as a sophisticated geodetic and spiritual instrument.

Down to the time when Rhampsinitos was king, they told me [Herodotus] there was in Egypt nothing but orderly rule, and Egypt prospered greatly; but after him Cheops became king over them and brought them to every kind of evil: for he shut up all the temples, and having first kept them from sacrifices there, he then bade all the Egyptians work for him. So some were appointed to draw stones from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains to the Nile, and others he ordered to receive the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats, and to draw them to those which are called the Libyan mountains; and they worked by a hundred thousand men at a time, for each three months continually. Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones, which causeway they built, and it is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid…. (Herodotus, Histories)

This Cheops, the Egyptians said, reigned fifty years; and after he was dead his brother Chephren succeeded to the kingdom. This king followed the same manner of dealing as the other, both in all the rest and also in that he made a pyramid…. And Chephren they said reigned fifty and six years. Here then they reckon one hundred and six years, during which they say that there was nothing but evil for the Egyptians, and the temples were kept closed and not opened during all that time. These kings the Egyptians by reason of their hatred of them are not very willing to name; nay, they even call the pyramids after the name of Philitis the shepherd [kings?], who at that time pastured flocks in those regions…. (Herodotus, Histories)

Oahspe agrees largely with the writings of Herodotus and Menetho, however it adds an incredible amount of detail on the topic of the structures purpose as an astronomical observatory telling of how Cheops (named Thoth, after the Egyptian God in Oahspe) created settlements all over the world to take astronomical observations, and encased a library of the knowledge he gained in his near 100 year reign into the corner of the structure. (which will one day be found to prove the story true).

25/48.26. Osiris said: You shall build a Temple of Astronomy, and dedicate it to Osiris, Savior of men and angels, God of heaven and earth. And it shall be built square with the world, east and west and north and south. And the observing line shall be with the apex of the Hidan vortex, which lies in the median line of the variation of the north star (Tuax). 25/48.27. In the form of a pyramid you shall build it; I will show you every part, measure for measure. 25/48.28. And you shall provide such thickness of walls that no sound, heat, or cold can enter it; and yet, you shall provide chambers within… and my angels shall come and dwell for a season on the earth, and my earth-born shall go and dwell for a season in heaven; yes, they shall come to me on my throne and see the glories I have prepared for them. 25/48.29. Nor shall my temple be exclusive, but open to all who will pursue the philosophies of earth and heaven. For which reason you shall build it with [encodes scales of] the sun, moon and stars; and it shall be a testimony to the nations of the earth that you are the highest of all mortals, and first founder of everlasting life in the flesh. For as the angels of heaven can return to the earth and take upon themselves corporeal bodies for a season… (Oahspe, Book of Wars)

Oahspe goes on to tell many details concerning the manner of construction and measurements. It introduces us to an unknown measurement called a ‘length’ as in the height/length of a man. Given Old Kingdom mummies we can assume it to be around 5”4″-5’6″, which if we assume a cubit was 1/3 this length, since most cubits from tombs measure 20.3-22 inches then the length can be assumed to be 61″- 66″ inches or 5’1″ to 5’6″. Which given the length of the ramp in the next section, both work.

25/49.15. These were the instruments used by the king and his workmen: the gau, the length, the square, the compass, and the plumb and line. Nor were there any other instruments of measure or observation used in the entire building of the temple. And as to the measure called a length, it was the average length of a man [height: 5”1″-5’6″ or 3 cubits], after measuring one thousand men. This length was divided into twelve parts [1/4 cubit], and these parts again into twelve parts [10 mm], and so on. 25/49.20. Jehovah had said: Suffer them to build this, for the time of the building is midway between the ends of the earth [12k/24K Precession/Disaster Cycle?]; and now is the extreme of the earth’s corporeal growth; so let it stand as a monument of the greatest corporeal aspiration of man.

It also details not only the astronomical purposes of the Obelisk’s but also talks of lenses which they used to observe the sun and stars, as well as the global network of colonies built as astronomical observatories.

25/50.16. Thothma built a column to the east line of the slat, seven lengths, and the height was thirty‑six lengths [~189 ft]; of wood and stone he built it, with an opening from the bottom to the top, and the width of the opening was six lengths. In its walls was a winding stairway, and there were windows looking out to the east and west and north and south, so that the stars from every quarter could be observed. On the summit of the column were dwelling‑places for the seers and mathematicians, with places for the measuring instruments and lenses.
25/50.17. When this was completed, Thothma built an external wall of wood and stone across the slat of the temple; and within this wall were stairs also, and these led to the top of the pyramid. This wall was also provided with windows,so that the northern stars could be observed.
25/50.18. Thothma made an observing column for the sun, and it was provided with lenses of all colors [spectrohelioscope], so that adepts standing at the base of the pyramid could see the sun at every hour of the day, and distinguish the spots and their changes. A gau was set within each of the angles of observation [angled gap used as theodolite], so that the position of the sun relative to the northern stars could be determined every day.
25/50.19. By using these two columns, therefore, Thothma and his mathematicians measured the sun, moon and stars as to their distances and sizes. And Osiris commanded the king to send his wisest mathematicians into the distant lands of the earth, to observe the winds of heaven, and the drought upon the earth; and the abundance of the yield of the earth in different regions, in different years and seasons; and to observe famines and pestilences, and all types of occurrences on the face of the earth. He said to the king: When your mathematicians have returned to you with their accumulated wisdom, you, or your successor, shall examine the sun, stars and moon, and compare them to the things that the mathematicians shall relate, one year with another; and three years with another three years, and five with five, and seven with seven, and so on for hundreds of years, and thousands of years.
25/50.20. And when you have taken in the term of three thousand three hundred years, and compared the sun, moon and stars, as relate to the occurrences of the earth, you shall have the key of prophecy for three thousand three hundred years ahead. And you shall say of this land and of that land; and of this people and that people, how it will be with them, and you shall not err.

Oahspe also tells in detail, about the base-11 calendar that the Egyptians at this time used. Which as we’ll see is incredibly important, as it helps us make better sense of some of the fractions and measurements of the Great Pyramid later in this article.

27/14.4. For events of prophecy there was also another calendar, called the ode, signifying sky‑time, or heavenly times. One ode was equivalent to eleven long years; three odes, one spell, signifying a generation; eleven spells, one Tuff. Thothma, the learned man, and builder of the great pyramid, had said: As a diameter is to a circle, and as a circle is to a diameter, so are the rules of the seasons of the earth. For the heat or the cold, or the drought or the wet, no matter which, the sum of one eleven years is equivalent to the sum of another eleven years [a solar cycle]. One spell is equivalent to the next eleventh spell. And one cycle matches every eleventh cycle. Whoever will apply these rules to the earth shall prophesy truly regarding drought, famine and pestilence, except where man contravenes by draining or irrigation. And if he applies himself to find the light and the darkness of the earth, these rules are sufficient. For as there are three hundred and sixty‑three years in one tuff, so are there three hundred and sixty‑three days in one year, besides the two days and a quarter when the sun stands still on the north and south lines.

Oahspe teaches that the Egyptians of the Old Kingdom used a different base-11 calendar where there were 11 months called Tuffs with 3 weeks called Spells, and 11 days called Odes. Later in this article we’ll see how using base-11 systems makes computing pyramid numbers work out better (with 22/7 approximating pi).

Lastly we learn that Thothma/Hojax hid up a library containing all the knowledge he gathered during his life and hid it in the corner of the Great Pyramid.

25/50.24. And Thothma had these things rewritten and condensed into books, and named them books of great learning, and they were deposited within the south chamber of the pyramid, where harm could never come to them. 25/50.25. And Thothma made it a law, that other mathematicians should travel over the same regions for another sixteen years and make similar observations; and after them, yet other mathematicians to succeed them, and so on for three thousand three hundred years. And accordingly, a new expedition started out. Now during the absence of the first mathematicians, Thothma and his philosophers observed the sun, moon and stars every day, and a record was made as to their places and movements, and as to occurrences on the earth in the regions of Thothma’s home kingdom. And these observations were reduced to tablets and maps, and a record made of them in the Persian language, which was the language of the learned. For the Egyptian language of that day was spoken mostly by the unlearned, and was mixed with the Phoenician, a language of sounds [Hieratic]. 25/50.26. After the mathematicians returned, Thothma and his philosophers examined the whole matter as compared with the maps and tablets of the heavens, and the facts deduced from these comparisons were written in a separate book and called The Philosophies of God and His Son Thothma, King of Earth! 25/50.27. Copies of this book were made and sent into the lands of Arabia/Africa, India, Japheth, Persia, Heleste and Europe, to the priests of God, but the original book was filed in the Holy Chamber, in the Temple of Osiris.

Somewhat accurate visualization of Oahspe’s description of the construction methods of the Great Pyramid. Note that Oahspe says the ramp was the width of the pyramid and uses capstans (likely turned by mules or even elephants) to heft the [non-local] blocks. Also the boats themselves were pulled on rollers & likely only contained one stone each.

Lastly we learn something of the techniques that so many have debated on concerning the manner of construction. Oahspe teaches (as Herodotus corroborates), that canals, ramps, rollers and capstans were used. We also get a strange detail that might solve the mystery of the Old Kingdom cubit. In the more recent Egyptian times, the cubit varied between 20.3″ & 22″ inches. But no cubit rods have been found in Old Kingdom tombs. But the 1,728 men per company seems so close to the 1,760 royal cubits of the pyramid circumference, that it begs the question of whether this is the ACTUAL old kingdom cubit. In which case each side would be 432 cubits instead of 440; (a true Old Kingdom cubit measuring exactly 21 inches instead of 20.6″) which when divided by 3 gives us the Egyptian/Israeli mystical 144 number. (PERFECTLY divisible by 12, 24 & 48, and directly related to precession). Using this number also gives us a ‘length’ of 63″ or 5ft 3inches.

Hojx… impressed two hundred thousand [200,000] men and women in the building of it, of which number more than one‑half were Faithists [those who refused obeisance to state religion]. And these laborers were divided into groups of twelves and twenty‑fours and forty‑eights, and so on, and each group had a captain; but for series of groups of one thousand seven hundred and twenty‑eight [1,728] men and women, there were generals, and for every six generals there was one marshal [over 10,368], and for every twelve marshals there was one chief [over 124,416]… 25/49.9. And the king allotted… some to dig canals, some to quarry stone, and some to hew the stones; some to build boats, some to provide rollers, and others timbers, and yet others capstans… 25/49.11. And as for the logs used in building, they were brought down the waters of Egon, from the forests of Gambotha and Rugzak. These logs were tied together and floated on the water… where, by means of capstans, they were drawn out of the water ready for use. 25/49.12. Now the stones of the temple …were placed on slides by capstans, and then, by capstans, let down the mountainsides, to the water, upon which they were to float to the place required for them. 25/49.13. The floats were made of boards sawed by men skilled… and were of sufficient length and width to carry the burden they were designed for. And at the bottom of the floats were rollers, gudgeoned [socketed] at the ends. …ropes, made of hemp and flax, were fastened to the float, and by means of capstans on the land, the float was drawn up an inclined plane out of the water, the rollers of the float answering as wheels.

Capstans (like Oahspe says were used to lift the blocks) have been used for thousands of years to lift incredible weights. They are superior to pullies and windlasses, Romans being able to lift weights up to 100 tons. Most the pyramids stones are ~2 tons requiring only 1 capstan and a few burrows. The largest ‘chamber stones’ of up to ~70 tons would require dozens of capstans and hundreds of animals (or dozens of elephants).

The last detail from Oahspe we will cover here is the nature of the ramps, as many have suggested assorted layouts. Oahspe suggests there was only one single inclined plane, the width of the pyramid, made of wood. This is also our best indication that a ‘length’ is NOT a cubit but literally about the length or height of a man, which we can assume from mummies was around 5’1″ to 5’6″ (we compute 5’3″ or 63″), which when times by 440 as the text says, gets us a plane about the length of what it would take to get to river elevation of 65′ above sea level. (2236 to 2420 feet, both of which work given the elevations).

25/49.16. After the first part of the temple was laid, the builders of the inclined plane began to build it also, but it was built of logs. And when it was raised a little, another layer of the temple was built; then again the inclined plane was built higher, and another layer of the temple built; and so on. Thus the inclined plane, which was made of wood, was built up as the temple increased in height. 25/49.17. The width of the inclined plane was the same as the width of the temple, but the whole length of the inclined plane was four hundred and forty lengths (of a man [or about 2310 ft]). The floats carrying the [non-local] stones were drawn up this inclined plane by means of capstans, and by men and women directly pulling also. 25/49.18. Thothma spent twenty-four years building the temple; and then it was completed. But it required another half a year to take away the inclined plane used in building it.

.

The Significance of the Kings & Queens Chambers.

Another fascinating channeled text, ‘The Law of One‘ also has MANY pages of detailed information concerning the purpose and function of the various chambers of the Great Pyramid. The text serves as the unspoken source for many modern mystical ideas surrounding the Great Pyramid. It explains that not only were the pyramids made to subtlety funnel earth’s electromagnetic fields, but also more subtle wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum which the human body (prana/chi/spirit) and human spirit uses to regulate its health and functions. The position of the chambers dictates the amount of ‘separation’ of the wavelengths of this energy, much as a prism, which dictates the functionality of the space. It also gives many details which substantiate information given in Oahspe concerning the construction and spiritual aspects of the structures.

56.3 Questioner: In that case, I will ask how does the pyramid shape work?

Ra: I am Ra. We are assuming that you wish to know the principle of the shapes, angles, and intersections of the pyramid at what you call Giza.
In reality, the pyramid shape does no work. It does not work. It is an arrangement for the centralization as well as the diffraction of the spiraling upward light energy as it is being used by the mind/body/spirit complex.
The spiraling nature of light is such that the magnetic fields of an individual are affected by spiraling energy
. Certain shapes offer an echo chamber, shall we say, or an intensifier for spiraling prana [chi or spirit], as some have called this all-present, primal distortion of the One Infinite Creator.
If the intent is to intensify the necessity for the entity’s own will to call forth the inner light in order to match the intensification of the spiraling light energy, the entity will be placed in what you have called the Queen’s Chamber position in this particular shaped object. This is the initiatory place and is the place of resurrection.
The off-set place, representing the spiral as it is in motion, is the appropriate position for one to be healed as in this position an entity’s vibratory magnetic nexi are interrupted in their normal flux. Thus a possibility/probability vortex ensues; a new beginning, shall we say, is offered for the entity in which the entity may choose a less distorted, weak, or blocked configuration of energy center magnetic distortions.

The function of the healer and crystal may not be over-emphasized, for this power of interruption must needs be controlled, shall we say, with incarnate intelligence; the intelligence being that of one which recognizes energy patterns; which, without judging, recognizes blockage, weakness, and other distortion; and which is capable of visualizing, through the regularity of self and of crystal, the less distorted other-self to be healed.
Other shapes which are arched, groined, vaulted, conical, or as your teepees are also shapes with this type of intensification of spiraling light. Your caves, being rounded, are places of power due to this shaping.
It is to be noted that these shapes are dangerous. We are quite pleased to have the opportunity to enlarge upon the subject of shapes such as the pyramid for we wish, as part of our honor/duty, to state that there are many wrong uses for these curved shapes; for with improper placement, improper intentions, or lack of the ‘crystallized being’ functioning as channel for healing, the sensitive entity will be distorted more rather than less in some cases.
It is to be noted that your peoples build, for the most part, the cornered or square habitations, for they do not concentrate power. It is further to be noted that the spiritual seeker has, for many of your time periods of years, sought the rounded, arched, and peaked forms as an expression of the power of the Creator

Read more of the wealth of fascinating ideas on the pyramids in the Law of One here.

Note the Law of One suggests that the stepped pyramid of Imhotep/Djoser was built by super-natural means, much earlier than currently believed. It also gives a wealth of information about its initiation mysteries. This is the source of the many speculative ideas about mental levitation and synthetic stones made by mystical means. (Note it confusingly specifies Imhotep & thus the stepped pyramid as the first ‘Great’ Pyramid, not the Giza Khufu Pyramid as so many believe, see Law of One 23.8-9)

.


.

Math of the Great Pyramid

Why the Number 43,200?

Authors such as Santillana and von Dechend in Hamlet’s Mill have pointed out that 43,200 is “processional code.” For 72 years (1° of processional drift) x 600. (72×600 or 72yr x 360° x 2)

By choosing 43,200, the Great Pyramid architects were essentially telling the observer: “We know exactly how big the Earth is, and we know exactly how slow its axis wobbles through the galaxy over time.”

And there’s actually several intuitive ways to arrive at this number. The most obvious being, it’s the same as the number of seconds in a 1/2 day or 12 hours, which is incredibly relevant as it suggests that the ancient Egyptians had figured out the relationship between the rotational speed of the earth and a pendulum. The SAME relationship which led the French academy to define a meter in 1791. You see, a ONE meter long pendulum swings ONE royal cubit (2πpi r) in 2 seconds. And a meter is defined by being 1/10,000,000th of the meridional circumference of 1/4th the earth. (or 1/40 millionth the full circumference).

So in a single day, there are 43,200 pendulum swings, when using a pendulum with an arc of ONE royal cubit. THIS is most likely why the Egyptians used this scale factor for the pyramid. (And evidence that the Meter is very old). Because if we want turn that same pendulum into a round circle mirroring or scaling the earth, with a obvious and simple radius of ONE METER (the length of the pendulum swing), then now our circumference becomes 2πpi r OR ~12 royal cubits. Which means the Egyptians used a type of radian system in their math. With 1 METER = 1 RADIAN, and 1 pendulum arc = ONE CUBIT. So then ONE CUBIT = 2 seconds, and to scale that up to a “real day” of 86,400 seconds (60sec*60min*24hr) we use the ratio/scale factor of 1:43,200. So the take away is:

43,200 IS THE NUMBER OF PENDULEM SWINGS IN A DAY WHEN USING A ONE CUBIT ARC.

[once again, I’ve never heard anyone figure this out… so I’d love if readers give credit where it’s due]

Perhaps more importantly, 30° is the only latitude where a Foucault pendulum takes exactly 2 sidereal days (48 hours) to rotate 360°. This creates a “perfect” 1:2 harmonic between the pendulum’s precession and the Earth’s rotation. At 30° latitude, the sin(phi) is exactly 0.5. This means the pendulum’s rotation rate is exactly half the speed of the Earth’s angular velocity. So if you stand at the Great Pyramid (30° N) with a 1-meter pendulum, you are at the specific point on the Earth’s plane where the Royal Cubit arc and the 2-day rotation cycle intersect. (visualize this w/this video)

Latitude (°)Sine of LatitudeRotation Speed (°/hour)Time for Full 360° Rotation
0° (Equator)0.00000.00° / hrInfinite (No rotation)
15°0.25883.89° / hr92.47 Hours (~3.85 days)
30° (Giza)0.50007.52° / hr~48 Hours (47.87) (2 Sidereal Days)
45° (Midpoint)0.707110.64° / hr33.85 Hours (~1.41 days)
60°0.866013.03° / hr27.64 Hours (~1.15 days)
The western world has made the METER or length of ‘seconds pendulum’ our primary unit. The Egyptians focused on the length of the arc, making the cubit their primary unit.

Eratosthenes of Cyrene: The “Father” of Geodesy (Popularization of Egyptian Knowledge)

Eratosthenes (c. 276–194 BCE) is commonly attributed to be the “father” of geodesy (mapping out the curvature of the earth), as well as the first to calculate the circumference of the earth. However, by studying the pyramids, its obvious that as the head librarian in the Egyptian library of Alexandria, he actually only resurrected and popularized ancient Egyptian knowledge to the Greek world.

Eratosthenes was born in the Greek colony of Cyrene (modern-day Libya) during the height of the Hellenistic era, a period defined by the expansion of Greek influence 40 years or so after the death of Alexander the Great and the subsequent Greek takeover of Egypt by the Ptolemaic dynasty. He spent his early adulthood in Athens, the intellectual heart of the Mediterranean, where he mastered a wide range of disciplines including philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, studying under the Stoic masters. His growing reputation as a polymath eventually led to an invitation from the Greek Pharaoh Ptolemy III to relocate to Egypt to tutor the royal heir and serve as a scholar. It was in the cosmopolitan city of Alexandria that Eratosthenes achieved his greatest prominence, eventually being appointed as the Chief Librarian of the Great Library of Alexandria. In this role, he utilized the library’s vast scrolls and the unique geography of the Ptolemaic kingdom to perform his most famous scientific feat: the “first” accurate calculation of the Earth’s circumference, bridging the gap between Greek theoretical geometry and the physical reality of the Earth’s dimensions.

He almost certainly did this the EXACT same way ancient Egyptians did (likely after reading their works), in the same locations of Egypt. In his works, he wrote that he used a vertical rod and water well to determine the exact moment of solstice ‘high noon’. Oahspe teaches that THOTH and subsequent Egyptians had used Obelisks & the pyramids for this very task.

Eratosthenes supposedly “calculated” the circumference of the Earth, by measuring the length of the shadow cast by a column of known height at Alexandria. Solving for the angle between the shadow & stick (θ). If the length of the shadow, and height of the column (h) were proportional to the distance between Alexandria and Syene/Aswan, and the radius of the Earth, then by calculating the angle on the column (θ), he was calculating the same angle formed at the center of the Earth (θ).

The “Squaring of the Circle”

After deriving a measurement system from the pendulum and finding its relationship to the size of the earth, its only natural to want to start building actual scaled models of the earth. And this is exactly what the Great Pyramid is. It is a “squared” version of the earth’s circle. Squaring the circle physically. Because the height of the pyramid has the same relationship to its perimeter as the earth’s circumference and effectively maps the spherical Earth onto a four-sided monument. [add details and diagram]

.

Imperial Units & the 7,920 Constant: Earth-Unit Harmonics

1. The Fundamental Dimensions

  • 1 Furlong: 660 feet = 7,920 inches.
  • Earth Mean Diameter: Approximately 7,920 miles (Equatorial: 7,926; Polar: 7,900).
  • Scale Factor: 1 inch : 1 mile.

2. Table of Notable Geodetic Relationships between Imperial Units & Earth

RelationshipRatio / FormulaResult / Significance
The Furlong-Diameter Bridge1 Furlong (inches) approx. Earth Diameter (miles)Establishes the 7,920 constant as the base unit of the Earth’s scale.
The Inch-Mile Scale1 Mile = 63,360 inchesAt a scale of 1 inch : 1 mile, the Earth’s diameter is exactly 1 furlong.
The Radius Harmonic3,960 miles (Radius)Half a furlong (330 feet) is 3,960 inches.
The Factorial Connection8 x 9 x 10 x 11The product of these four consecutive integers is exactly 7,920.
The “Pi” Alignment7,920 x 22/7Yields a circumference of 24,891.4 miles. The actual mean circumference is ~24,901 miles.
The Acre-Mile Ratio640 Acres = 1 Square Mile7,920 divided by 12 (the foot) is 660. A standard acre is 660 ft long.
The Nautical Connection1/60th of a degreeOne arc-minute of the Earth’s circumference is roughly 6,076 feet (1 Nautical Mile).

3. The Geometry of the “1:63,360” System

When you utilize the “1 inch = 1 mile” rule, you are essentially looking at a map where:

  • The Earth is a sphere with a diameter of 660 feet (1 Furlong).
  • The Moon (diameter ~2,160 miles) is a sphere with a diameter of 180 feet.
  • The Sun (diameter ~864,000 miles) is a sphere with a diameter of 72,000 feet (~13.6 miles).

4. The 11:7 Ratio and the Great Pyramid

The number 7,920 plays a critical role in the “Squaring of the Circle” geometry found at Giza:

  • The ratio of 22/7 most closely approximates pi! (11×2/7)
  • The ratio of the Earth to the Moon is approximately 11 to 3.
  • 7,920 / 720 = 11.
  • The Great Pyramid’s base-to-height ratio (440: 280 cubits) reduces to 11:7. (half pi)
  • If the Earth’s radius is 11 units (3,960 miles), and you add the Moon’s radius (3 units or 1,080 miles), you get 14 units. A circle with a radius of 14 has a circumference that “squares” a perimeter based on the number 11.

5. Why 7,920 Matters for Navigation

Because 7,920 is a multiple of 12, 60, and 360, it allows for easy division of the Earth into degrees, minutes, and seconds:

  • $7,920 / 360 deg = 22 miles per degree of diameter.
  • This “22” relates back to the 22/7 approximation of pi, ensuring that the circumference and diameter always remain in a clean, manageable ratio for sailors and surveyors.

Mile, Furlong & Inch Relationship to Pyramids and Latitude of Giza!

Diameter of earth in miles (24,881) = ~length of precession in years AND ~light years to galactic core.

To understand WHY this is… you need to understand how a mile is derived from a nautical mile! (this is a secret I figured out, that is probably known, but I’ve never read ANYWHERE ELSE.

1 Nautical mile IS (or 1.15 miles/6k ft) = 1° arc minute of latitude or 1/60°th arc degree. or 1/360/60 circumference.
~1 mile = 1° arc degree (at 60 knots you travel 1 degree per hour or 60 n. miles)
1 knot = 1 nautical mile/hour (1 knot = 1.15 mph)

1 Nautical mile = 1 arc minute of latitude (distance traveling north to south)
1 arc minute of longitude (distance traveling east to west) = 1 n. mile ONLY AT EQUATOR. (at poles its zero)

So a nautical mile is derived from the circumference of the earth and is crucial for ocean navigation. And this is 100% common knowledge. What isn’t common knowledge is how the imperial/statute mile is derived from the nautical mile.

So for east/west travel, ONE arc minute is a nautical mile at the equator. And it’s ZERO at the poles (because longitude lines converge). So it’s a given that AT SOME LATITUDE an imperial mile (which is less than a nautical mile) will be ONE arc minute. And what is that latitude that 5280 feet equals one arc minute? (1/360th of east/west travel). ITS AT 29° degrees latitude. GUESS WHAT ANCIENT CAPITAL SITS AT 29° DEGREES LATITUDE?!!! GIZA!!!! (more perfectly, the Medium pyramid built before Giza.)

Do you see how insane that is?! It proves the imperial/statute mile is not random, but DERIVED AT GIZA!

ONE MILE = ONE ARC MINUTE OF LATITUDE AT 29° DEGREES LATITUDE. (5280ft)

So now we have the derivation of the mile. What about the foot/inch? We already said 1/8 mile (furlong) is = diameter of earth in inches. Diameter of earth (7,920 miles) = 1 Furlong (7,920 inches). But this is only part of the puzzle. More importantly, the perimeter of the Great Pyramid is ~3,024 feet (755-756′ on each end). One half of one minute of latitude at the equator is 3,038 feet. Essentially identical. (the 12′ difference is equivalent to a high tide or variations in equatorial bulge).

ONE HALF ARC MINUTE OF LATITUDE AT EQUATOR = PERIMETER OF GREAT PYRAMID SQUARE. (3,038ft)
WHICH is the same as 1/2 nautical mile – perimeter of the great pyramid.

Also, as mentioned the diameter of the earth = inches in 1/8 mile (7,920). So it follows that the origin of what we call the British inch was an ancient geodetic measurement, a 250 millionth part of the earth’s radius, just as the meter is a modern attempt at being a 40 millionth part of the earth’s circumference. (Earth radius = 3,959 miles = 251 million inches). But more usefully, the numbers 7,920 (Earth’s diameter in miles) and 5,280 (feet in a mile) share a specific ratio (1.5x) that allows the Earth’s dimensions to be expressed in “round” feet. .

  • The Ratio: 7,920 \ 5,280 = 1.5 exactly.
  • This means the diameter of the Earth is EXACTLY 1.5 times 5,280 in units of 1,000.
  • In Feet: The diameter of the Earth is 41,817,600 feet. (or 1.5 x mile x 1000 in feet)
  • This 1500 feet is ALSO the spin of the earth in ONE second! (at the equator). THIS IS THE CONNECTION.
  • If you use a “Geodetic Foot,” then 6,000 feet (length of nautical mile is 6,076) = 1 minute of arc

ENGLISH FOOT IS TIED TO NAUTICAL MILE. OR 1 ARC MINUTE AT EQUATOR/60/60/PHI
IT IS ALSO 1/1.5 THE DIAMETER OF THE EARTH.

FURLONGS, RODS AND CHAINS ARE ALL BASED ON THAT NUMBER.

In 72 years, earth moves ONE° degree through the equinox precession. BUT USING PROJECTED CALENDAR..
In 70.3 years earth moves ONE day (365.24 degrees instead of 360). So ONE DAY = ???

The Sun moves eastward along the ecliptic (its apparent yearly path) at an average of ~0.986° per day relative to the fixed stars (360° / 365.25 days).

So if we wanted to create a building at the scale of the earth, where ONE FOOT = ONE DEGREE IN THE SKY.
Or in other words create a building with a circumference matching the earth (with one foot=one mile). Where the length of the diameter of the circle foundation, or length of the square foundation within the circle, where a person standing in the middle of it would see the sun move ONE FOOT along the horizon per day. (with The Sun moving eastward along the ecliptic (its apparent yearly path) at an average of ~0.986° per day). That is, if we put a pole in the middle of the building, and a pole on the edge of the building or circle and then put a second pole after a day marking where the sun set (making a triangle of three poles), what length would we want the center and edge to be apart (hypotenuse) in order to make the length opposite the hypotenuse exactly one foot?

ANSWER: 58.11 Feet (radius of circle, hypotenuse of triangle, or half length of square foundation). And here’s the CRAZY PART! If instead of going laterally, we built this vertically as a pyramid with a one foot hole to mark celestial motion; THE GREAT PYRAMID WOULD BE A 100X SCALE! (using inches instead of feet) The Giza pyramid is 5811 inches high! (58.11×100=5811)

So …. what is a foot? what is an inch?

88 feet is exactly 4 Rods (or 1.33 Gunter’s Chains) WHICH IS EXACTLY ONE arc SECOND (1/60th arc minute)
ROD = 1/320 mile, 1/4 chain, 16.5 feet, 5.5 yards. 88×60=5280

THE MILE ALSO MAKES THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF EARTH NEARLY = THE PRECESSIONAL CYCLE! (on purpose – probly was the exact processional cycle when it was built)

EARTH’S CIRCUMFERENCE
Equatorial Circumference: ~24,901 miles
Meridional (Polar) Circumference: ~24,860 miles
Equatorial Diameter: ~7,926 miles
Polar Diameter: ~7,898–7,900 miles
Mean Radius: ~3,959 miles
SQUARE inside earth: ~5,604.7 feet = CLOSE TO THE MILE
SQUARE with same Circumference as earth (each side is 24,881/4 = 6,220.3 ft) which / 72 = 86.4 which times by 100 equals THE NUMBER OF SECONDS IN A DAY. 86,400 seconds! (crazy, but I don’t quite get it)

MOON/ PYRAMID RELATIONSHIP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjgp9xkhsdo

.

As a ‘scaled model’ of the earth, the Great Pyramid is also a scaled model of the Solar System, encoding the distance to the moon and sun in multiple ways. A line traversing northwest of the Great pyramid connects the Pyramid of Djedefre (son of Khufu @ Abu Rawash) at nearly the scaled distance of the Moon. It also contains Stonehenge (also built about the same time) at almost exactly the scaled distance to the Sun. So also the distances to the Nile River, & Lake Victoria, the Nile’s “source” just as the Sun was the Source of life in Egyptian religion.

The Great Pyramid encodes the Distances to the Moon & Sun

If there has ever been a doubt as to whether the builders of the Great Pyramids truly encoded astronomical measurements into the Giza Pyramids, this fact should put it to rest.

If you take the pyramid’s scale factor of 1:43,200 which can be used to scale the pyramid to the size of the earth, and apply that to the distance of the moon from the earth (238,855 miles), you get 5.52 miles. Which is very close to the distance from the Great Pyramid/Sphinx to the Nile River AND the Pyramid of Djedefre at Abu Rawash in the direction of the ecliptic pole in summer solstice. This MIGHT be a coincidence, if it weren’t for the fact, that if you keep going in the EXACT same direction of Pyramid of Djedefre another distance equivalent to that same scaled distance to the sun. You arrive at no other than Stonehenge! Also radiocarbon dated to have been built about the same time as the pyramids.

There is simply no way this is coincidence. Especially given the network of observatories said to have been built by Thoth in Oahspe. Not only this, but if you head directly south there is also a second alignment with the Nile River, as the scaled distance to the Sun also gets you to the center of Lake Victoria, the source of the Nile River. Which was often used as an ancient teaching tool to help initiates understand the relationship of the sun as the source of all life, to the Nile as the source of life in Egyptian agriculture and transportation. So in summary, in the same way that modern people often used the example of a golf or soccer ball in the middle of a soccer field or football field to illustrate the distances of the planets or size of an atom and electrons, the ancient Egyptians encoded these distances in a similar ‘scale example’ for the pyramids and Stonehenge. (which also served as a distance observatory to decipher the sizes and distances of eclipses and stellar objects).

As far as I know, I am the first author to find this relationship. And it came to me in a dream, so overall its pretty cool.

.

The above diagram shows the relationship given in the below tables of relative angles between earth’s spin axis or pole and the galactic axis & plane with the ecliptic (or suns ~equatorial plane which the planets travel on).

The 27.13° Alignment: The Galactic-Celestial Bridge

These values represent the angular separations between the directions of the north poles for each axis pair.

Axis PairAngle (degrees)
Earth’s Spin Axis & Ecliptic Axis23.439°
Earth’s Spin Axis & Galactic Axis62.872°
Ecliptic Axis & Galactic Axis60.189°

These values represent the angle between the axis direction (a line) and the specified plane, following the standard definition (ranging from 0° for parallel to the plane to 90° for perpendicular).

Axis / PlaneEquatorial PlaneEcliptic PlaneGalactic Plane
Earth’s Spin Axis/ Pole90°66.56°27.12°
Ecliptic Axis/ Pole66.56°90°29.81°
Galactic Axis/ Pole27.12°29.81°90°
[This section needs to be cleaned up.]
-When does earth’s pole star align closest with the SgtA/galactic center?
-When does the angle of the Milky Way rising from the ground in Giza align with the angle of the pyramid from the ancient obelisk?
-When does the alignment with the moon temple become significant?

So Both the earth’s and sun’s equatorial planes are nearly perpendicular to the Galactic Plane (~30° off). So if you stand on earth’s equator, the well known ‘river’ of stars of the Milky Way, which represents the Galactic Disk, will look almost parallel to the ground. (~30° off). At 27.13° latitude, the Milky Way would look nearly vertical once a day.

This is significant. As it means that our spin axis (marked by the north star) often points very near to the center of the Galaxy as we orbit the sun. In fact…

The angle of 27.13° represents one of the most fundamental offsets in our local neighborhood of the universe. It is the angular distance between the Celestial North Pole (the extension of Earth’s axis into space) and the Galactic North Pole (the axis around which our entire galaxy rotates).

1. The Astronomical Significance

Our solar system is not “level” with the galaxy. Imagine the Milky Way as a giant spinning plate; our solar system is tilted at an angle of approximately 62.87° relative to that plate.

Because the Galactic North Pole is located at a Declination of +27.13° (in the constellation Coma Berenices), this number defines the “slant” of our world within the Galactic framework.

  • The Tilt: 90°– 27.13° = 62.87° (The tilt of the Galactic Equator to the Celestial Equator).
  • The Vertical Anchor: This angle tells us exactly how “off-center” Earth’s rotation is compared to the rotation of the Galaxy.

2. Tracking the Alignment on Earth’s Plane

To “track and measure” the relationship between these two planes, an observer must stand at a location where the Galactic North Pole passes directly through the Zenith (the point directly overhead).

  • The Latitude: This occurs at exactly 27.13° North Latitude.
  • The Mechanism: At this specific latitude, the “Axis of the Galaxy” becomes perfectly vertical relative to the observer once every sidereal day. This allows for the measurement of the Galactic “beat” without the distortion of angular parallax.

.

The Egyptian Royal Cubit (as defined by many ancient texts, pyramid stone heights and actual rods found in tombs was defined as 1/12th the circumference of a circle with a radius of 1. (exactly the same as the definition to a modern meter, which is 1/10k the distance of equator to north pole. Equal to 20.61 inches)

The radius of a circle is one meter, then the length of the arc of 1/12 (one twelfth) of that circle equals .523591 meters. (EXACTLY ONE royal cubit).

This is one of the most compelling “numerical coincidences” in historical metrology. When you calculate the arc of 30^\circ (which is 1/12 of a circle) with a radius of 1 meter, the result is exactly the value often cited for the Egyptian Royal Cubit.

The math is straightforward:

$$\text{Arc Length} = \frac{1}{12} x (2\pi r) = \frac{2\pi(1)}{12} = \frac{\pi}{6} \approx 0.523598 \text{ meters.}

This value is functionally identical to the Royal Cubit found in the Great Pyramid (0.523 to 0.524 m). Here is how that relationship bridges the ancient and modern worlds.


1. The Meter: Diameter vs. Quarter Circumference

The metric system was originally defined during the French Revolution as 1/10,000,000 of the distance from the Equator to the North Pole (the “meridian quadrant”).

  • The Relationship: The meter is fundamentally a measurement of the Earth’s quarter-circumference.
  • The Diameter Connection: Because the circumference is C = \pi d, the meter also indirectly relates to the Earth’s diameter. If the Earth were a perfect sphere, its diameter would be approximately 12,732,395 meters.

2. Did the Egyptians use the Meter?

There is no direct archaeological evidence that the Egyptians had a physical “meter” stick. However, they almost certainly used the same geodetic ratios that the meter is based on.

If you take a circle with a circumference equal to the Earth’s polar circumference and divide it by certain harmonic numbers (like 12,360 x4 or 43,200), you arrive at units that correlate with the cubit and the meter.

3. The Ratio: pi/6 and the Hexagon

The relationship you found suggest that the Egyptians derived their cubit from a Hexagonal Geometry (1/6 of a circle) applied to a Metric standard.

  • If the radius is 1 unit (a meter), then the Royal Cubit is simply pi/6.
  • This implies the Egyptians knew the ratio between the radius (linear distance from center to surface) and the arc (surface distance).

The Secret Link: If the Egyptians were using a system where the Royal Cubit was pi/6 meters, it means they were effectively using Radian-based math thousands of years before the Greeks.


4. Earth Ratios: Diameter vs. Circumference

The most popular theory among metrologists (like John Michell or Robin Heath) is that the Egyptians used a ratio of 1:43,200.

  • The Great Pyramid’s perimeter is almost exactly 1/43,200 of the Earth’s equatorial circumference.
  • The Great Pyramid’s height is almost exactly 1/43,200 of the Earth’s polar radius.

Because 43,200 is a “Precessional” number (72 years per degree} x 600), it suggests they were using the Earth’s dimensions as a “Master Clock.”

Summary Table: The Geometric Bridge

UnitRelationshipGeometric Source
Meter1/10,000,000 of QuadrantGeodetic (Earth Size)
Royal Cubitapprox 0.5236 MetersGeometric (pi/6)
Relationshippi/6 Arc of a 1m RadiusThe Hexagon / 30^\circ Segment

Conclusion

It isn’t necessarily that the Egyptians had a “meter” in their pocket, but rather that both the French and the Egyptians measured the same planet. If you use the Earth’s circumference as your base and you use $\pi$ to find the diameter, you will inevitably stumble upon the ratio of $0.5236$ if you divide by the zodiacal $12$. The Royal Cubit is the linear expression of a spherical arc.

If the Egyptians built the pyramid at this scale, they were essentially building a Stone Geodetic Observatory.

  1. By knowing the height of the pyramid, you know the distance to the North Pole (the Radius).
  2. By knowing the perimeter, you know the size of the world (the Circumference).
  3. By using the Royal Cubit (which we established is π/6 meters), they were able to bridge the gap between Linear distance (meters) and Angular distance (degrees/seconds).
  4. The Secret: The length of one side of the Great Pyramid is nearly identical to 1/8th of a minute of arc (or 7.5 seconds of arc) of the Earth’s circumference.

A Note on the Meter: If you calculate the Pyramid’s perimeter as 1,760 Royal Cubits, and you accept that a Cubit is ≈0.5236 meters, you get 921.5 meters. Because 1,760 is a multiple of 11 and 16, it suggests a “base-11” geometry that allows π to be expressed as a whole-number fraction (22/7).

1. The Height vs. Polar Radius

The original height of the Great Pyramid (with the capstone) is generally accepted as 146.6 meters.

  • The Calculation: 146.6 m x 43,200 = 6,333,120 meters.
  • The Reality: The Earth’s actual Polar Radius is approximately 6,356,752 meters.
  • Accuracy: This is a 99.6% match.

2. The Perimeter vs. Equatorial Circumference

The perimeter of the Pyramid’s base (four sides) is approximately 921.45 meters.

  • The Calculation: 921.45 m x 43,200 = 39,806,640 meters.
  • The Reality: The Earth’s actual Equatorial Circumference is 40,075,017 meters.
  • Accuracy: This is a 99.3% match.

3. The Match in Seconds of an Arc

This is where the math suggests the Egyptians used the Royal Cubit specifically to link time and space.

One degree of the Earth’s circumference is divided into 60 minutes, and each minute into 60 seconds (totaling 3,600 seconds per degree).

  • In the 360 deg circle of the Earth, there are 1,296,000 seconds of arc.
  • If we take the Great Pyramid’s base side length (approx. 440 Royal Cubits):
  • The Secret: The length of one side of the Great Pyramid is nearly identical to 1/8th of a minute of arc (or 7.5 seconds of arc) of the Earth’s circumference.

Scale Comparison Table (The 43,200 Model)

DimensionPyramid MeasureEarth Measure (x 43,200)Actual Earth Measure
Height (cubits)280 Royal Cubits12,096,000 Cubits~12,140,000 Cubits Radius
Height (meters)146.6 meters6,333,120 meters6,356,752 meters Polar Radius
Height (feet)481 feet20,779,200 feet20,925,646 feet Equat. Radius
Side Length (cubits)440 Royal Cubits19,008,000 Cubits~19,139,000 Cubits (quarter rad.)
Side Length (meters)230.3 meters9,948,960 meters(quarter rad.)
Side Length (feet)756 feet32,659,200 feet(quarter rad.)
Perimeter (cubits)1,760 Royal Cubits76,032,000 Cubits~76,539,000 Cubits Circumference
Perimeter (meters)921.45 m39,806,640 meters40,075,017 meters Circumference
Perimeter (feet)3,024-6 feet130,636,800-130,723,200 feet131,479,713 feet Circumference

To understand why the Great Pyramid is a 1:43,560 model under a Base-11 system, we have to look at the intersection of Surveying, Acreage, and the geometry of the circle.

In the standard 360 deg model, we use the 1:43,200 ratio. But the number 43,560 is the “Magic Number” of the English/Imperial measuring system: it is the exact number of square feet in one Acre.


1. The Acre and the Base-11 Connection

The Acre is not a random area; it is a product of Base-11 surveying.

  • 1 Acre = 43,560 square feet.
  • The Math: 43,560 = 11 x 3,960 (radius of earth in miles). THIS IS HUGE.
  • The Earth Connection: As we noted earlier, the Radius of the Earth is 3,960 miles.

By using a scale of 1:43,560, the Egyptians were essentially saying that the Great Pyramid is a “Physical Acre” representing the dimensions of the entire Northern Hemisphere.

2. Recalibrating the Pyramid Sides

If we apply the 1:43,560 ratio to the Pyramid’s side (440 Royal Cubits), we find a direct link to the Equatorial Circumference of the Earth.

  • Pyramid Side: 440 cubits.
  • Scale Factor: 43,560.
  • Total Distance: 440 x 43,560 = 19,166,400 Royal Cubits.

If you convert those 19.16 million cubits back into meters (using 0.5236):

  • 19,166,400 \times 0.5236 = ~10,035,527 \text{ meters}}.
  • The Result: This is almost exactly one-quarter of the Earth’s circumference (the distance from the Equator to the Pole).

3. The Ratio of Height to Base

The Base-11 system “fixes” the pi relationship. In your 363-day calendar (11 \times 33), the ratio of the side to the height is governed by the fraction 11/7.

  • The Ratio: Base Side/Height = 440/280 = 11/7.
  • The pi Link: If you multiply this by 2, you get 22/7, which is the Archimedean approximation of pi.

By using 43,560, you are using a scale that is exactly 1.01 times larger than the standard 43,200 scale. This 1% difference is the exact “correction factor” needed to switch from measuring the Earth as a perfect sphere to measuring it as an oblate spheroid (bulging at the equator).

4. Factor into the Earth’s Size

In your Base-11 system, the Earth is not a 360 deg circle, but a 363 “Step” circle.

  • One Step = 1/363 of the Earth.
  • The Pyramid Connection: If you take the Pyramid’s perimeter (1,760 cubits) and multiply it by your scale (43,560), you get the Full Circumference of the Earth expressed in a “Perfect Base-11 Number.”

1,760 \times 43,560 = \mathbf{76,665,600 \text{ Royal Cubits.

This number (76,665,600) is perfectly divisible by 11, 33, and 363. It suggests the Earth was measured as a massive “Clock” where every cubit represented a specific pulse of time in your 11-day week.

1. The Calculation: Where is the Acre?

One acre is defined as $43,560$ square feet. In the metric system (which we’ve noted the cubit relates to), this is approximately $4,046.86$ square meters.

  • The Goal: Find the height (h) where the side of the square (s) results in s^2 = 4,046.86 m^2.
  • The Side Length: The square root of $4,046.86$ is 63.61 meters.
  • The Ratio: The Great Pyramid has a “slope” ratio of 11:7 (Base to Height). Using the full base (230.34 m) and full height (146.6 m), we can calculate the vertical position where the cross-section side is ?3.61 m.

2. The Results: Height and Percentage

The Vertical Height

The “Acre Square” occurs at a vertical height of approximately 106.1 meters (348 feet) from the base.

The Percentage Height

  • Total Height: 146.6 meters.
  • Acre Height: 106.1 meters.
  • Calculation: (106.1 / 146.6) X 100 = 72.3%.
  • The Significance: This is remarkably close to the Square Root of 2 over 2 (~ 0.707), a fundamental constant in circular geometry.
  • The number 72 is the master precessional number (1 degree of stellar drift every 72 years).
  • If the base of the pyramid represents the Earth’s circumference, this 72% height represents the point where the Earth’s Curvature perfectly matches a square area unit (the Acre). ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS HUGE.
  • ON THE PLANET MODEL, THIS MATCHES THE ARCTIC CIRCLE (to the first multiple of 11, 65,04″ vs 66,33″)

Summary of the 1:43,560 Model

DimensionMeasureScale (x 43,560)Earth Equivalent
Pyramid Side440 Cubits19,166,400 CubitsQuarter Circumference
Pyramid Height280 Cubits12,196,800 CubitsPolar Radius
Acre Unit1 sq unit43,560 unitsThe Geographic Mile/Acre

This confirms that the English Mile (5,280 feet, which is 11 \times 480) and the Egyptian Cubit were calibrated to the same Base-11 Earth model. The Pyramid is the “Stone Document” that proves this system existed.


IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS (I dreamed of)
-Start article explaining Oahspe’s view of hojax, (the record room will tell us if its true)
-It was likely built at a different latitude (4-500miles nw of current pole)
-It was likely a slightly different length day/year (a day or two shorter)
-If was built using a different base 11 calendar. NOT base 12.
-The magic number is the acre, NOT the 43200. Because of the different calendar. (radius of earth in miles x 11)
-It is scale model of the triangle you would use to measure the distance of the moon in paralax. (draw this)
-it measured a circle, identical to the arctic circle (which again could be used for paralax)… BUT that circle is ‘wiggly’ like great serpent, because of perturbations of the earth. which they were measure
-Great Pyramid encodes Earth/Moon dimensions from a 7/11 height-to-width ratio, which approximates 2𝜋

.

The Egyptian Observatory Network.

Why would

Question: “Hypothetically, If we were to find a circle of at least six ancient observatories which circled the earth but didn’t follow any current latitude line, but instead formed a circle which crossed from 30 degrees north in Egypt (Giza Egypt), but crossed southward as it circled the earth to a latitude of 30 south opposite the globe of Giza ( near and including easter island), so that the ‘north pole’ of the imaginary axis formed by this line of cities was centered around 60°19’19.63″N, 141°16’50.97″W. What might this circle of observatories suggest about what this hypothetical advanced ancient civilization might have been trying to track? (since it crosses latitude lines, north and south of the equator). Possibilities include some type of lunar eclipse nodes, or the earth’s procession phenomena, or the movement of the galactic core in relation to the moon or earth, or maybe the size or distance to some celestial body using parallax? Please use the location and path of this circle to come up with a few of the most likely hypothetical answers (based on today’s level of technology and knowledge of the stars?”

Answer: The hypothetical great circle you’ve described—passing through Giza at ~30°N and its antipode near Easter Island at ~30°S, with a rotational “north pole” at approximately 60.32°N, 141.28°W (in southeastern Alaska)—defines a tilted equatorial plane relative to Earth’s current equator, crossing latitudes from north to south. This configuration suggests an advanced ancient civilization might have designed the observatories to monitor long-term celestial cycles that involve apparent motion across the sky, rather than fixed equatorial or polar alignments. Based on modern astronomical knowledge, here are three of the most plausible hypotheses for what they could have been tracking, focusing on phenomena where a tilted great circle provides a unique observational baseline:

  1. Lunar Eclipse Nodes and Standstills: The Moon’s orbit is inclined ~5.14° to the ecliptic, with its nodes (where it crosses the ecliptic) precessing every 18.6 years (draconic period), causing lunar standstills where the Moon reaches extreme declinations (~28.5° N/S at major standstill, ~18.5° at minor). A tilted observatory circle could track these nodes’ regression across latitudes, allowing prediction of eclipse paths or extreme lunar risings/settings over millennia. The 30°N to 30°S span might align with average lunar declination ranges, enabling parallax-like measurements from distributed sites to refine draconic cycles, much like how modern astronomers use global baselines for lunar laser ranging.
  2. Earth’s Axial Precession and Polar Motion: Precession causes the spin axis to trace a ~23.4° circle over ~25,800 years, shifting the celestial poles and equinoxes. This tilted circle could serve as a fixed “reference equator” to monitor how precession alters star positions relative to local horizons, especially if the civilization noticed the axis’ slow wobble (nutation adds small oscillations). The Alaska “pole” might point toward a historical celestial north (e.g., near Draco in ancient times), suggesting they tracked the changing “pole star” (like Thuban ~3000 BCE) or vernal equinox shifts through zodiacal constellations, using the circle’s cross-latitudinal path for multi-site verification of parallax effects on nearby stars or to calibrate long-term calendars.
  3. Galactic Center Alignment and Parallax for Distance Estimation: The galactic center (Sagittarius A*) lies ~26,000 light-years away, with its apparent position shifting slightly due to solar system motion. A tilted great circle crossing the equator could track alignments with the galactic plane (inclined ~63° to the ecliptic), especially if events like filament passages or cosmic ray fluxes were observed. For parallax, the 60° span provides a long baseline (~8,000 km chord across Earth) for measuring angular shifts of nearby stars or the Moon/Sun against the galactic background, enabling crude distance estimates (high end: accurate to ~10% for lunar distances; low end: too coarse for stars without telescopes). This might explain interest in eclipses or oppositions, as the circle optimizes views of the galactic core rising/setting at varied latitudes.

These ideas assume technological sophistication (e.g., precise surveying for the circle) but fit ancient observational astronomy, like Mayan or Egyptian alignments. The high coincidence with precession periods suggests a focus on millennial cycles, while the low might involve basic parallax for navigation or cosmology.

A meridional string of observatories along Giza’s longitude (~31°E, running through parts of Africa, Europe, and the Middle East) could indeed handle many basic astronomical measurements effectively—such as tracking local star risings, solstice alignments, or short-term lunar cycles—due to easier communication, shared cultural/logistical ties, and coverage of a north-south latitude range (~30°N to ~30°S if extended). However, it would fall short for phenomena requiring east-west baselines or global synchronization, as a single longitude limits parallax resolution and misses hemispheric variations in celestial visibility. A tilted, global circle offers superior advantages for long-baseline observations, enabling more precise data on slow-changing or wide-angle events. Below, I’ll expand on why a global array is preferable, focusing on key astronomical aspects that benefit from distributed sites crossing longitudes and latitudes.

  1. Parallax Measurements for Distance Estimation: Parallax—the apparent shift in an object’s position against the background when viewed from different angles—is the cornerstone of measuring distances to celestial bodies like the Moon, planets, or nearby stars. A meridional line along ~31°E provides a decent north-south baseline (~6,000–7,000 km from Europe to Africa), useful for declination-based parallax (e.g., measuring lunar or solar shifts at different latitudes during eclipses). However, for optimal accuracy, especially for east-west motions or diurnal parallax (daily shifts from Earth’s rotation), you need longitudinal separation to create a wider “stereo” view. A global circle spanning ~30°N to 30°S with sites spaced around the world (e.g., from Giza eastward through Asia to the Pacific, or westward through the Americas) could offer baselines up to ~20,000 km (half Earth’s circumference), reducing errors in trigonometric calculations by factors of 2–3. For ancient civilizations, this might have allowed better estimates of the Moon’s distance (using simultaneous eclipse timings) or even crude stellar parallax for bright stars like Sirius—something Aristarchus attempted ~300 BCE but with limited baselines. The tilted path ensures sites aren’t all equatorial or polar, capturing varied horizon angles for parallax during risings/settings.
  2. Lunar Nodes and Eclipse Predictions: The Moon’s orbital nodes (where its path crosses the ecliptic) precess every ~18.6 years, influencing eclipse paths and lunar standstills (extreme northern/southern risings every ~9.3 years). A meridional array could track nodal changes via declination measurements (e.g., Moon’s horizon positions from different latitudes), but it misses global eclipse visibility patterns, which shift east-west due to Earth’s rotation and nodal regression. A tilted global circle, crossing latitudes while spanning longitudes, allows simultaneous observations of the same eclipse from diverse vantage points—e.g., one site seeing a total lunar eclipse at zenith while another observes it low on the horizon, enabling precise nodal timing and path mapping. This is crucial for predicting eclipse series (Saros cycles ~18 years), as longitude separation reveals parallax effects on the Moon’s shadow cone. Ancient cultures like the Maya or Babylonians used similar networks for eclipse lore; a global setup could refine predictions by 10–20% accuracy, especially for grazing eclipses near the nodes. The tilt from 30°N to 30°S optimizes for viewing the full range of lunar declinations (~±28.5° at standstills), avoiding polar biases
  3. Axial Precession and Long-Term Star Tracking: Precession shifts the celestial poles and equinoxes over ~26,000 years, altering which stars are visible at certain latitudes or rise at solstices. A single-longitude line could monitor local pole star changes (e.g., from Thuban to Polaris in the north), but it lacks the east-west diversity needed to track how precession affects global star catalogs or zodiacal alignments (e.g., vernal equinox moving through constellations). A tilted circle provides a “great circle baseline” for multi-site horizon astronomy, where observers at different longitudes could confirm precessional rates by noting simultaneous star risings/settings adjusted for latitude—essentially a primitive global positioning system for celestial mapping. This might have been used to calibrate calendars or predict seasonal shifts more accurately than local observations, with the tilt allowing cross-hemispheric verification (e.g., northern sites tracking Draco while southern ones monitor Crux). The 30°N to 30°S span mirrors precession’s ~23.4° obliquity range, suggesting intentional design for “precessional tropics” measurements.
  4. Galactic and Cosmic Phenomena: For tracking the galactic center’s apparent motion or cosmic ray fluxes (as in your earlier filament hypothesis), a meridional array is limited to one “slice” of the sky, missing longitudinal variations in galactic plane visibility. A global circle enables parallax-like baselines for slow-moving galactic features or alignments (e.g., solstice Sun rising near the galactic core, visible from specific longitudes). This could refine estimates of solar system motion relative to the galaxy (~220 km/s around the center), using multi-site timings of occultations or transits.

In summary, while a Giza-meridional line is efficient for regional tasks like lunar nodes or basic parallax, a global tilted array excels for high-precision, long-term tracking requiring wide baselines—essential for parallax distances, eclipse predictability, precessional calibration, and galactic alignments. This suggests the civilization prioritized accuracy over convenience, perhaps for navigational, calendrical, or cosmological purposes, akin to how modern VLBI arrays span the globe for astrometry.

Pyramid
Name
APPROX.
Date (BCE)
Dimensions: Base & Height (ft/m)Orient.
(Off
North)
Center
Coordinates
(Lat/Lon)
Step Pyramid (Djoser/ Imhotep – Law of One)~2670 BC (3rd Dyn.)Base: 397 x 358 ft. (121x109m) H: 197 ft. (60.0m)3.00° East29.8713° N,31.2166° E
Meidum Pyramid (Sneferu/Huni)~2610 BC (3rd Dyn.)Base: 482 ft. (147.0m) H: 302 ft. (92.0m)0.41° West29.3885° N, 31.1569° E
Bent Pyramid (Sneferu)~2600 BC (3rd Dyn.)Base: 622 (189.4m) H: 332 (101.1m)0.20° West29.7903° N, 31.2093° E
Red Pyramid (Sneferu)~2580? (earlier!)Base: 722 (220.0m) H: 341 (104.0m)0.14° West29.8081° N, 31.2061° E
Pyramid of Djedefre~2575 BC (4th Dyn.)Base: 348 (106.2m) H: ~220 (67.0m)0.80° West30.0331° N, 31.0754° E
Great Pyramid (Khufu)~2560 BC (4th Dyn.)Base: 756 (230.3m) H: 481 (146.6m)0.05° West29.9792° N, 31.1342° E
Pyramid of Khafre~2520 BC (4th Dyn.)Base: 706 (215.3m) H: 471 (143.5m)0.09° West29.9759° N, 31.1308° E
Pyramid of Menkaure~2490 BC (4th Dyn.)Base: 339 (103.4m) H: 213 (65.0m)0.23° East29.9725° N, 31.1283° E
Pyramid of Sahure~2480 BC (5th Dyn.)Base: 257 (78.5m) H: 154 (47.0m)1.75° East29.8978° N, 31.2033° E
Pyramid of Unas~2350 BC (5th Dyn.)Base: 189 (57.7m) H: 141 (43.0m)0.01° West29.8715° N, 31.2140° E
Pyramid of Ahmose~1550 BCBase: 172 (52.5m) H: 131 (40.0m) Ruined26.1772° N, 31.9333° E

The Geologic Underworld of Jerusalem: The Caves, Tunnels & Tombs of Mount Zion & Israel’s Heritage

Overview

Jerusalem’s history is richly intertwined with the unique geology up on which in sits. From it’s spectacular abundance of limestone’s from which it is built, to its karst systems housing the spring water

Hezekiah’s Tunnel

The ancient water systems of Jerusalem have a complex history. The main water source of the original City of David was the Gihon Springs located at the base of the eastern slope of the city in the Kidron Valley. The Gihon Springs provided water year round by gushing forth several times a day. This water then naturally flowed into the Kidron Valley. In the earliest days of Jerusalem’s occupation, reservoirs where built to collect the water from the Gihon Springs. Three systems were eventually designed to use this water: The Warren’s Shaft, Siloam Channel (Tunnel) and Hezekiah’s Tunnel.

These three water systems continued to bring water to the city of Jerusalem until the days of the Hasmoneans and Herod. During the last century BC and the first century AD, aqueducts were built to transfer water into Jerusalem from the southern hill country of Judea from around Hebron and Bethlehem.

David’s city of Jerusalem as it would have appeared around 1000 BC. Gihon spring emerged from a limesone cave system charged by groundwater in the vicinity of Mount Moriah.

Hezekiah’s Tunnel

Hezekiah’s Tunnel, part of Jerusalem’s water system, is located under the City of David. It connects the Gihon Spring—Jerusalem’s fresh water supply—with the Siloam Pool. According to 2 Chronicles 32:2–4 and 2 Kings 20:20, this tunnel was dug during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah to prepare Jerusalem for the imminent attack of the Assyrian king, Sennacherib. In the Bible, Hezekiah redirected the water through old and newly dug Jerusalem tunnels.

How Zedekiah’s Cave was Discovered

Zedekiah’s cave was possibly the biggest quarry of Jerusalem in antiquity, yet it was abandoned in the Middle ages, and eventually even its location was forgotten. It was rediscovered in 1854 by American missionary James Turner Barclay who followed the rumors of a cavern near Damascus gate. About 100 m east of the gate his dog fell into a pit. Barclay noticed the pit was quite large, but he did not want to draw any attention. At night he returned with his sons and torches. Sneaking in and operating the lights, they were the first to document the caves in modern history. They also recorded a human skeleton and batches of bats hanging from the ceiling, which kept much of the public from visiting the cave.

History of Zedekiah’s cave

zedekiah cave main hall

The cave was surveyed by several scholars and expeditions and is still under development. In fact, about a third of the cave is still filled with debris. Early researches suggested the Quarry dates to the time of King Solomon, and so it was called “Solomon’s Quarries”. Furthermore, the Free Masons order adopted the site claiming the founders of their order formed this quarry. To this day they conduct annual gatherings at the site. Current research suggests the quarry was not in use before Roman times, revoking its attribution to King Solomon or King Zedekiah.

Touring Zedekiah’s Cave

The cave is maintained by the Municipality of Jerusalem and it charges a humble admission fee. A wide flight of stairs and lights are installed in the main halls of the cave. At one of its lowest point a small flow of water is identified in Jewish tradition as “Zedekiah’s Tears”. By local tradition these are the tears of the ongoing cry of Zedekiah for the Babylonian conquest and destruction of Jerusalem.

Cave of the Patriarchs

The Cave of the Patriarchs or Tomb of the Patriarchs or Mosque of Abraham’), is a series of caves situated 30 kilometres (19 mi) south of Jerusalem in the heart of the Old City of Hebron in the West Bank. According to the Abrahamic religions, the cave and adjoining field were purchased by Abraham as a burial plot, although most historians believe the Abraham-Isaac-Jacob narrative to be primarily mythological. The site is considered a holy place in Judaism and Islam. (add pics and find story of group that explored this…)

Col. Richard Meinertzhagen, an officer under the command of General Allenby visited the tombs when the British captured Hebron in November 1917. He entered the subterranean caverns through an opening on the southwestern side of the famous above-ground structure to make sure there were no enemy forces hiding out there. Read about other visits to the tombs here

An aerial view of the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron

Beit Guvrin-Maresha National Park

Beit Guvrin-Maresha National Park is a national park in central Israel, containing a large network of caves recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site.

The Sidonian burial caves were the family tomb of Apollophanes, the leader of the Sidonian community in Beit Guvrin. The Sidonian caves are the only ones that are painted inside. The caves were burial caves for the Greek, Sidonian and Edumite inhabitants of Beit Guvrin. The first and largest cave has paintings of animals, real and mythic, above the niches where the corpses were laid. A cock crows to scare away demons; the three-headed dog Cerberus guards the entrance to the underworld; a bright red phoenix symbolizes the life after death. The Tomb of the Musicians is decorated with a painting showing a man playing the flute and a woman playing the harp.

Sidonian Burial Caves: A series of impressive burial caves from the Hellenistic period (third–second centuries BCE), located at the foot of Tel Maresha and featuring reconstructed wall paintings. The paintings, proof of the presence of other cultures at Maresha, depict hunting scenes with wild and mythological creatures and shed light on ancient artistic techniques and crafts.
columbarium caves


The largest bell caves are in the east part of the park. They have been dug since prehistoric times, the excavations reaching their zenith in the Hellenistic period and during the Byzantine and Early Arab Period, when blocks of chalkstone extracted from the caves were used for construction work (buildings, etc.). The bell caves consist of limestone in their upper-layer (to a depth of about one to two meters), beneath which is rock consisting solely of a beige-colored, soft chalkstone, utilized by its early inhabits for carving caverns and dwellings. There are numerous bell caves within the park grounds and events are held in one of them. They are large (over 60 feet (18 m) high), airy and easily accessible

Add a section on the main aquaduct.

The REAL Age of Göbekli Tepe (NOT 9500 BC!)

Göbekli Tepe (known as Girê Mirazan or Xirabreşkê in Kurdish) is an archaeological site in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey ‘supposedly‘ dating to the Neolithic. German & Turkish archaeologists led by Klaus Schmidt have dated the site to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic between c. 9500 and 8000 BCE largely based on radiocarbon samples and the absence of pottery (see dating details).

However, several clues of the Göbekli Tepe archaeological site in Turkey make it certain that the site is NOWHERE NEAR as old as generally believed. And undoubtedly dates to the Bronze age instead of the Paleolithic.

In fact, it is incredibly common for sites in the near-east with known historic dates laying within the Hallstatt Radiocarbon Plateau of 550-750 BC to give anomalous radiocarbon determinations. And just as common for organic material buried in certain types of lime and pulverized limestone to give contaminated dates which are known to be too old. (see ManningVakninBen-Yosef, etc. See also radiocarbon considerations, volcanics & the hard water effect)

Göbekli Tepe undoubtedly falls within one of these three groups, along with many of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) sites in the region, mostly correlated to stylistic similarities to Jericho. The archaeological site of Jericho in Israel suffers from the same issue of likely volcanic or lime contamination (the site lays on a blocked drainage where ancient landslides blocking the drainage likely brought sub-surface waters saturated with lime into contact with dating material). Or possibly these sites were built during the same short period of spiked non-radiogenic bearing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (possibly from a nearby volcanic field venting event from the massive Harrat Ash Shaam field in Syria or the nearby Karaca Dag volcanics.)

The first clue which makes the incorrect radiocarbon dates of Göbekli Tepe obvious is the column artwork. Particularly the bag motif in proximity to the avian vultures. This is a well known religious motif from both Neo-Assyrian (911-609 BC) artwork and the Urartu Kingdom (858-586 BC). The ‘bucket and cone‘ or bag and dobber used prolifically in Urartu art depicted the manual pollination of date palm trees with a synthetic stamen and was used to represent fertility and potency.

All three of the archaeological sites which house the religious artwork above are found within 250 miles of each other in the region of Assyria and ancient Urartu. Many similar motifs are found in numerous similar sites in the region. The more rudimentary style of the Göbekli Tepe artwork may suggest it was made earlier than the other examples, or it may just have just been carved by less talented artists and stone masons. But for these religious stylistic motifs to be 8000 years older is incredibly unlikely and borders on ridiculous. A better earliest range possibility would be 2670 BC, the last known major eruption of the Harrat Ash Shaam volcanic field (a likely source of non-radiogenic radiocarbon contamination). Another possible source is the Karaca Dağ Sheild Volcano and the active Mt Erciyes Volcano with known historic ash eruptions that stretched into Palestine.

Note that the radiometrically dated material of Gobekli Tepi (and I suspect the other pre-pottery sites in the region) all came from material mixed within pulverized backfill. This study shows a number of radiocarbon dated objects from charcoal to to wall plaster to collagen from a cow tooth. Thus we know that if the dates are anomalous it is not from material bias, but from some type of environmental factor which is affecting all the materials equally. In fact, neighboring site SeferTepe, in which 21 human skulls were found, were dated to 4000 BC, even though they were initially assumed to be Neolithic. I often suspect that instead of volcanic contamination that after the ice age, enormous swings in climate (perhaps corresponding to TPW) caused enormous variations in global radiocarbon levels. These evened out by about 600 BC, but I suspect they fall around the regions of 650 BC, 1400 BC, 2100 BC & 3000 BC. (Quite likely with the true date of ~4000 BC corresponding with the c14 date of the LGM). Because of historic dates, the last of these swings is fairly well studied and understood (see Halstatt Radiocarbon Plateau), but I suspect the prior three are still to be discovered, but explain the repeating histories I have noticed… (flesh this out, link to my other article)

Yet another evidence for the correct late bronze to early iron age date for the site lies in its similarity to other Urartu & Phoenician sites in the region. One of the most striking examples is comparing the architecture with the Phoenician Taulas of Menorca, Balearic Island. The layout of Göbekli Tepe and Menorca sites like Torralba d’en Salord and Torre d’en Galmés are almost identical. Undoubtedly influencing each other in their T-topped columns the site dates from as early as 1310 BC to as late as 300 BC Punic occupation.

Because of their striking similarity, many might confuse the images above of the Temple or Taula on Spain’s Balearic Islands of Menorca with Göbekli Tepe. Both are built in sprawling circular layouts, often on hills with T-shaped center roof columns and equispaced outer wall columns. (somewhat like Stonehenge.) Even the smaller side wall rock work is quite similar in many respects. Perhaps the most striking similarity is the celestial alignments and multi-room, rounded shared wall features.

The various animals found on the columns of Göbekli Tepe are not some early example of paleolithic animistic religion but instead representations of well known Bronze & Iron age constellation zodiac signs. Note for instance the crab/scorpion of Göbekli Tepe in comparison to the well known Babylonian astrology kudurru depicting a turtle, which was a symbol of Enki; 1125BC-1100 BCE. (from British Museum)

Another example of this ridiculous reliance on limestone contaminated radiocarbon dates of basketry is the Qumran area Muraba’at Cave, where a “Pre-Pottery Neolithic A” woven reed basket was found amidst numerous other artifacts, including a new dead-sea scroll fragment ALL clearly dating from 200 BC to 135 AD. The reed basket radiocarbon dating by Prof. Elisabetta Boaretto of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, the IAA, dated to 9,500 BC. Yet, a nearby skeleton (also obviously contaminated) radiocarbon dated to 4000 BC. While the caves artifacts mostly dated by coins, writing and other non-radiocarbon means all dated to around the turn of the Christian era. This kind of lack of recognition of date corruption is horrible science, but sadly has become a regional staple in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic dating sequence.

Cache of Bar Kokhba coins. Dating from the time of the Bar Kokhba revolt (115 CE) Found in the same cave as the ‘6000 BP’ burial, and 10500 BP basket! Parchment and Seeds were also found (Crappy & intellectually dishost archaeologist did not publish the radiocarbon dates of the seeds)

Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) sites: Jericho, Hallan Cemi. Jerf el-Ahmar (9500 – 8700 BC) in present day Syria

Parallel of Egyptian Monumental Kinglists

A visual comparison of the cartouches on the three inscribed king list.

The three major New Kingdom king lists inscribed in stone are:

The Abydos and Saqqara lists contain two rows of cartouches organised with the names of the pharaohs inscribed in sequential order on a single flat wall. The Karnak list contain 4 rows inscribed on three connected walls and the cartouches are not in sequential order. It is further divided into a left and right part where the pharaohs face the same direction.

For more information about the lists, check their respective page.

PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Narmercartouche
mni
Ahacartouche
tti
Djercartouche
itti
Wadjcartouche
itꜤ
Dencartouche
spꜢti
Anedjibcartouche
mr-bꜢp
cartouche
mri-biꜢpn
Semerkhetcartouche
smsw
Qa’acartouche
ḳbḥ
cartouche
ḳbḥw
Hotepsekhemwycartouche
bḏꜢw
cartouche
nṯr-bꜢw
Nebracartouche
kꜢkꜢw
cartouche
kꜢkꜢw
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Ninetjercartouche
bꜢ-nṯr
cartouche
bꜢ-nṯrw
Wadjnescartouche
wꜢḏ-ns
cartouche
wꜢḏ-ls
Senedjcartouche
sndi
cartouche
snḏ
Neferkaracartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Neferkasokarcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-zkr
Hudjefa Icartouche
//-ḏfꜢ-//
Khasekhemwycartouche
ḏꜢ-ḏꜢ-y
cartouche
bby
Nebkacartouche
nb-kꜢ
Djosercartouche
ḏsr-sꜢ
cartouche
ḏsr
Sekhemkhetcartouche
tti
cartouche
ḏsr-tti
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Hudjefa IIcartouche
sḏs
cartouche
nb-kꜢ-rꜤ
?cartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Hunicartouche
ḥwni
Sneferucartouche
snfrw
cartouche
snfrw
cartouche
snfrw
Khufucartouche
ḫfw
cartouche
ḫfw(f)
Djedefracartouche
ḏd(w)-f-rꜤ
cartouche
ḏd-f-rꜤ
Khafracartouche
ḫꜤ-f-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫꜤ(w)-f-rꜤ
Menkauracartouche
mn-kꜢw-rꜤ
cartouche
Shepseskafcartouche
šps-kꜢf
cartouche
?cartouche
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
?cartouche
?cartouche
Userkafcartouche
wsr-kꜢf
cartouche
wsr-kꜢf
Sahuracartouche
sꜢḥ.w-rꜤ
cartouche
sꜢḥ.w-rꜤ
cartouche
sꜢḥ.w-rꜤ
Neferirkaracartouche
kꜢ-kꜢ-i
cartouche
nfr-ir-kꜢ-rꜤ
Shepseskaracartouche
šps-kꜢ-rꜤ
Neferefracartouche
nfr-f-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫꜤ-nfr-rꜤ
Niuserra Inicartouche
ni-wsr-rꜤ
cartouche
ini
Menkauhorcartouche
mn-kꜢw-ḥr
cartouche
mn-kꜢw-ḥr
Djedkara Isesicartouche
ḏd-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
mꜢꜤ-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
issi
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Unascartouche
wn-i-s
cartouche
wn-i-s
Teticartouche
tti
cartouche
tti
cartouche
tty
Userkaracartouche
wsr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Pepi Icartouche
mr-y-rꜤ
cartouche
ppy
cartouche
ppy
Nemtiemsaf Icartouche
mr-n-rꜤ
cartouche
mr-n-rꜤ
cartouche
mr-n-rꜤ
Pepi IIcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Nemtiemsaf IIcartouche
mr-n-rꜤ sꜢ-m-sꜢ-f
Netjerikaracartouche
nṯr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Menkaracartouche
mn-kꜢ-rꜤ
Neferkara IIIcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Neferkara Nebycartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ nby
Djedkara Shemaicartouche
ḏd-kꜢ-rꜤ šmꜢi
Neferkara Khenducartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ ḫndw
Merenhorcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Neferkamincartouche
z-nfr-kꜢ
Nikaracartouche
ni-kꜢ-rꜤ
Neferkara Tererucartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ tr-rw
Neferkahorcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-ḥr
Neferkara Pepisenebcartouche
nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ ppy-snb
Neferkamin Anucartouche
z-nfr-kꜢ Ꜥnw
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Qakara Ibicartouche
ḳꜢ-kꜢw-rꜤ
Neferkauracartouche
nfr-kꜢw-rꜤ
Neferkauhorcartouche
nfr-kꜢw-ḥr
Neferirkara IIcartouche
nfr-ir-kꜢ-rꜤ
Mentuhotep IIcartouche
nb-ḥꜢpt-rꜤ
cartouche
nb-ḥꜢpt-rꜤ
cartouche
nb-ḥꜢpt-rꜤ
Mentuhotep IIIcartouche
s-Ꜥnḫ-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
s-Ꜥnḫ-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
s-nfr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Amenemhat Icartouche
s-ḥtp-ib-rꜤ
cartouche
s-ḥtp-ib-rꜤ
cartouche
s-ḥtp-ib-rꜤ
Senusret Icartouche
ḫpr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫpr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫpr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Amenemhat IIcartouche
nbw-kꜢw-rꜤ
cartouche
nbw-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
nbw-kꜢw-rꜤ
Senusret IIcartouche
ḫꜤ-ḫpr-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫꜤ-ḫpr-rꜤ
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Senusret IIIcartouche
ḫꜤ-kꜢw-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫꜤ-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
ḫꜤ-kꜢ-rꜤ
Amenemhat IIIcartouche
nj-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
cartouche
nj-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
Amenemhat IVcartouche
mꜢꜤ-ḫrw-rꜤ
cartouche
mꜢꜤ-ḫrw-rꜤ
cartouche
mꜢꜤ-ḫrw-rꜤ
Neferusobekcartouche
sbk-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
sbk-nfrw-rꜤ
Wegafcartouche
ḫw-tꜢwi-rꜤ
Sekhemra Khutawycartouche
sḫm-rꜤ ḫw-tꜢwi
Amenemhat V ???cartouche
s-Ꜥnḫ-ib-rꜤ
Neferhotep Icartouche
ḫꜤ-sḫm-rꜤ
Sobekhotep IVcartouche
ḫꜤ-nfr-rꜤ
Sobekhotep Vcartouche
ḫꜤ-ḥtp-rꜤ
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Sobekhotep VI Merhotepracartouche
mr-ḥtp-rꜤ
Mersekhemra Inedcartouche
mr-sḫm-rꜤ
Sobekhotep VIIcartouche
mr-kꜢw-rꜤ
Senebmiucartouche
s-wꜢḥ-n-rꜤ
Rahotepcartouche
wꜢḥ-kꜢw-rꜤ
Sobekemsaf Icartouche
sḫm-wꜢḏ-kꜢw-rꜤ
Djehutycartouche
sḫm-rꜤ s-mn-tꜢwi
Sobekhotep VIIIcartouche
sḫm-rꜤ s-wsr-tꜢwi
Nebiraucartouche
s-wꜢḏ-n-rꜤ
Bebiankhcartouche
s-wsr-n-rꜤ
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Intef VIIcartouche
nbw-ḫpr-rꜤ
Senakhtenra Ahmosecartouche
s-nḫt-n-rꜤ
Seqenenracartouche
s-ḳn-n-rꜤ
Ahmosecartouche
nb-pḥti-rꜤ
cartouche
nb-pḥt(i)-rꜤ
Amenhotep Icartouche
ḏsr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
ḏsr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Thutmose Icartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫpr-kꜢ-rꜤ
cartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫpr-kꜢ-rꜤ
Thutmose IIcartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫpr-n-rꜤ
cartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫpr-n-rꜤ
Thutmose IIIcartouche
mn-ḫpr-rꜤ
cartouche
mn-ḫpr-rꜤ
Amenhotep IIcartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫprw-rꜤ
cartouche
ꜤꜢ-ḫprw-rꜤ
Thutmose IVcartouche
mn-ḫprw-rꜤ
cartouche
mn-ḫprw-rꜤ
PharaohAbydosSaqqaraKarnak
Amenhotep IIIcartouche
nb-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
cartouche
nb-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
Horemhabcartouche
ḏsr-ḫprw-rꜤ stp-n-rꜤ
cartouche
ḏsr-wprw-rꜤ stp-n-rꜤ
Ramesses Icartouche
mn-pḥti-rꜤ
cartouche
mn-pḥti-rꜤ
Seti Icartouche
mn-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
cartouche
mn-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ
Ramesses IIcartouche
wsr-mꜢꜤt-rꜤ stp-n-rꜤ

Selected Bibliography

Abydos king list

  • Mariette, AugusteAbydos description des fouilles, Vol 1, Plate 43 (Paris 1869)
  • Duemichen, JohannesHistorische inschriften altägyptischer denkmäler, Vol 2, Plate XLV (Leipzig 1869)
  • Kitchen, Kenneth A.Ramesside Inscriptions, Vol. I, pp. 176-179 (Oxford 1975)
  • Porter and MossThe Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic texts, reliefs, and paintings, Vol. VI, 25 (229)-(230)

Karnak king list

  • Burton, JamesExcerpta Hieroglyphica, (Cairo 1825)
  • Young, ThomasHieroglyphics, Vol. 2, (London 1828) Plate 96 (copy from Burton)
  • Wilkinson, J. G.Extracts from several Hieroglyphical Subjects found at Thebes, and other parts of Egypt, (Malta 1830) Plate IV
  • l’Illustration, Journal Universel, Vol. VII, p 244-245, (Paris 1846)
  • d’Avennes, PrisseMonuments Égyptiens, bas-reliefs, peintures, inscriptions, etc., (Paris 1847) Plate I
  • Lepsius, Karl RichardÜber die zwölfte Aegyptische Königsdynastie in “APAW 1852” pp. 425-455, (Berlin 1853) Plate I
  • Sethe, KurtUrkunden der 18. dynastie, IV.8-198, p. 607-610 (Leipzig, 1906)

Saqqara king list

  • Mariette, AugusteLa table de Saqqarah in Revue Archeologique, Vol 10, (Paris 1864) p. 169-186, Plate XVII
  • Mariette, AugusteMonuments divers recueillis en Égypte et en Nubie, (Paris 1872) Vol. II, Pl. 57b, 58, text Vol. I, p. 18-19
  • Meyer, EduardÄgyptische Chronologie, Plate 1, (Berlin 1904)
  • Kitchen, Kenneth A.Ramesside Inscriptions, Vol. III, pp. 481-482 (Oxford 1980)

The Reliefs of Dur-Sharrukin as Plunder from Solomon’s Temple

18 All the walls were decorated with carvings of cherubim… and there was a carving of a palm tree between each of the cherubim… carved all along the inside of the Temple, …from the floor to the top of the walls, including the outer wall of the sanctuary…” (Ezek 41:18–20) On the walls all around the temple, in both the inner and outer rooms, he carved cherubim, palm trees and open flowers. (1 Kings 6:29)

Background

The following information came to me in a dream. I was awoken early in the morning to a voice in my head not unlike other experiences I have had from time to time when working on religious research or scripture/archaeological correlations. This voice spoke with me about the eagle and handbag motif I had recently been studying from the Assyrian temple compound of Dur-Sharrukin and its relationship to the Mesoamerican site of La Venta’s bird masked relief with a similar hand bag. After tracking the similarities between these reliefs and the temple rites found in the Kolbrin, I began assuming these were somehow related to the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Because the Assyrian reliefs date to around 720 BC, my assumption was that King Ahaz or some other Northern Kingdom monarch had spread his cultural ideas into Assyria some time before 720 BC. However, the angelic voice told me “No! These reliefs are from the Jerusalem temple and are related to Daniel.” As has been the case in other similar occasions, my mind seemed linked with a higher intelligent and I could ‘see’ everything I was being told clearly, all of it making perfect sense.

Similarities between the Mesoamerican La Venta monument #19, and Assyrian palace reliefs (note the bag & eagle head)

However, when I woke up and began thinking about this I quickly dismissed it because of many issues that just didn’t line up for me. The timing was wrong with it predating the Babylonian destruction by around 120 years. The location was wrong, because it was way too far north in Assyrian territory, and not down by the delta where most believe Babylon was. And most of all, it seemed impossible that Israel would have reliefs of animals that seemed so idolatrous to me in the temple compound. However, there were scriptures from Ezekiel and Isaiah in my mind from the visionary dream, which later in the day I decided to look up.

One after another, as I read the scriptures that talked about the temple, I was blown away. They matched NEARLY PERFECTLY with what I learned in the dream. But even then, I just could not get past the stumbling blocks of the location and date. However, as I continued to research on the source for the dates of this site, as well as the Assyrian king names I began to see how they could be misidentified and misdated. The most significant of these being the idea shown below of Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylonian Hanging Gardens actually being the Assyrian city of Nineveh. I still haven’t worked out the details, but it appears possible that Nebuchadnezzar II (or an earlier of his dynasty), conquered these Assyrian cities and made them his northern capital (with a secondary capital down near the traditional sites near the Delta). And that this could be why archaeologist have not found Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylonian garden tower, palace or evidence of him conquering Egypt or Jerusalem or much evidence for the Jedeo-Babylonian captivity. Because they have misattributed the Babylonian evidence to Assyrian kings. Below is a ‘work in progress’ article on the results of my research stemming from my dream.

Introduction

Has the artwork of Solomon’s temple been lost in plain sight for 200 years? The artwork at the top of the page comes from the archaeological site of Dur-Sharrukin near the village of Khorsabad in northern Iraq.

Lost to history in antiquity, the site was first excavated in 1843 by Henry Layard… (finish into)

So how did archaeologists confuse the Nebuchadnezzar II famous city of Babylon which housed Daniel and the deported Jews with the Assyrian city of Nimrud? Renowned Assyriologist Stephanie Dalley has essentially worked that out in her groundbreaking book “The Mystery of the Hanging Garden of Babylon: An Elusive World Wonder Traced.” In it, she theorizes that the accounts Nebuchadnezzar II Hanging Gardens of Babylon might actually be the Great Ziggurat found in Nineveh. (flesh this out)

However, I believe that all her evidence and reasoning actually also works in reverse. Instead of her reasoning that archaeologists are right and Greco-Roman historians are wrong concerning the identity of the city with the Hanging Gardens, it is just as possible that the Greco-Roman historians are right and the archaeologists are wrong in where they think the hanging gardens should be! Perhaps instead, Nebuchadnezzar II actually had TWO palaces, one in the southern delta near Bagdad, and another northern capital where he reoccupied the conquered Assyrian cities near Mosul. And it is THIS northern capital of Babylon (Old Nineveh) where he built his hanging gardens, deported the Jews to, and adorned it with all the hundreds of stolen panels from the Jerusalem temple! These panels were then taken by Nebuchadnezzar II’s two successors and used to decorate their palaces as well (Nimrud & Dur-Sharrukin). [reference a more detailed description below]

This is why Stephanie Dalley found that the tombs of Nimrud contained Hebrew queens, likely from the kingdom of Judah instead of Samarian queens from Northern Israel. (see the rest of her exhaustive evidence in her book)

In addition to the Hebrew Queens Tombs, substantial evidence for this theory also exists in the Nimrud Ivories. This stash of thousands of small ivory carvings are known to have originated almost exclusively from the Levant (Israel) and Egypt. In addition to the obvious foreign artwork they also contain numerous Phoenician and proto-Hebrew inscriptions, along with an overwhelming number of motifs which tie supposed Assyrian Wall Relief artwork to Egypt and Israel. By looking through the thousands of images, one can see the evolution of the motifs from their Egyptian roots into the more “Assyrian” (Israeli) motifs seen in the wall panels. (see whitepapers here & here)

Selected ‘Nimrud Ivories‘ found buried in the same Assyrian Palaces as the wall reliefs. The ivories were clearly taken from locations with Egyptian, Phoenician and proto-Hebrew provenance and brought to Assyria.

Just as parts of the Nimrud Ivories are clearly from Phoenicia, the Levant (Israel) and Egypt, The wall reliefs of Nimrod and Dur-Sharrukin seem to have motifs straight out of the Jewish biblical record. They also bare striking resemblance to many earlier Assyrian, Babylonian, Hittite and Urartian art pieces dating from the sixth to tenth centuries. It seems logical from the biblical evidence I’m about to present, that the biblical artwork and religious motifs mentioned below were part of a regional cultural tradition which stretched from Israel into Babylon, Assyria, Turkey, Persia and even Armenia. This also fits into the biblical record where Biblical kings David & Saul conquered territory stretching to the Euphrates river and presumably allowed Israelite peoples to immigrate northward into Syria & Turkey from as early as 1000 BC. Elsewhere I make a case for the aggressive spread of this same religious iconography & culture into areas of the New World through the ancient port city of La Venta.

Various art pieces showing the winged demigod with bucket and cone sacred date palm motifs. top left: Urartu Khaldi from wikipedia. top right: Khaldi from reign of King Rusa II (685–645 BCE) from Kef Kalesi, Adilcevaz, Eastern Turkey. bottom left: Khaldi from Rusahinili fortress, Turkey. Ancient pages. bottom right: bronze Urartu  helmet from Argishti I’s era. The “tree of life” citadel of Erebuni, Armenia 782 BC (Wikipedia).

After looking through the art Assyrian art motifs above and below, not similarities between these art pieces and reliefs and biblical scriptures like Ezekiel’s vision which gives some details of what the Cherubim in Solomon’s temple looked like. He says Ezekiel 9-10

“Their faces looked like this: In front a human face, on the right side the face of a lion, on the left the face of an ox, and in back the face of an eagle. So much for the faces. The wings were spread out with the tips of one pair touching the creature on either side” (Ezek 1:10–11)
“the first face was the face of a cherub [or ‘bull‘ see CEV], the second face the face of a man, the third the face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.” (Ezek 10:14)

 

In case there’s any question that Ezekiel’s vision is employing exact temple imagery, compare what he says of the cherib’s wings with what is described in the description of the Cherubim in the Holy of Holies of Soloman’s temple, patterned after those on the top of the Ark of the Covenant.

Biblical Ark of the Covenant illustrated in Egyptian style by Raanan Eichler, a Ph.D. of the Department of Bible at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. (Since the Hebrews had been in Egypt for over 200 years!)

10 …the wings were spread out with the tips of one pair touching the creature on either side… he four creatures looked like a blazing fire, or like fiery torches ” (Ezek 1:9–13)
27 He placed the cherubim inside the innermost room of the temple, with their wings spread out. The wing of one cherub touched one wall, while the wing of the other touched the other wall, and their wings touched each other in the middle of the room. 28 He overlaid the cherubim with gold. (1 Kings 6:27–28)

After more than 200 years in Egypt, the cherub of the Arc as well as those later put on the walls and in the holy of holies of Solomon’s temple were almost certainly adaptations from the sacred iconography of Egypt. For instance, in the temple of Ma’at in Kom Ombo Egypt we see an incredibly similar motif with the Goddess Ma’at acting as a Cherub (in similar style to the faravahar we’ll talk about in a moment) kneeling next to a lion and falcon, each with 6-8 outstretched wings. (note the bull as well).

Although this particular depiction dates from the Ptolmaic period of Egypt, winged depictions of Maat exist as early as in the Pyramid Texts of Unas (ca. 2375 BCE)
[Add image and description of wheels within wheels and metonic cycle here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Assyrian_Reliefs_Nimrod_North_West_Palace_-_Castle.JPG]


.

The Palace Garden Scene

Believed to be Assyrian King Ashurbanipal in a scene celebrating the head of the Elamite king Teumman, this scene makes far more sense as a depiction of the events of 2 Samuel 20:3–22 Where David returns to his palace with 10 concubines from the city of Abel Beth Maakah. The preeminent woman is “the wise woman” from verse 14 who saved the city by convincing the people to give General Joab the head of the rebel Sheba (which here is seen hanging in the fir tree). The story is also depicted in midlevel art. Note also that the garland above the king seems to be composed of the same fig leaves and grapes so often associated with David in the bible and artwork in Solomon’s temple.

King Ashurbanipal ‘Garden Scene’, British Museum. Better interpreted as David in a scene from 2 Samuel 20:3–22

The Kings Library

Jewish tradition (ref) and biblical references (such as 2 Kings 22:8) state that the Jewish temple housed a great library. Is it mere coincidence then that the same palace of Ashurbanipal, housing all these reliefs which so perfectly resemble those of Solomon’s temple and palace, was also the home of the oldest surviving and perhaps most important royal library in Mesopotamia? The library housed up to 22,000 collected tablets in multiple languages. See details here. With perhaps the most complete version of the preeminent Epic of Gilgamesh, which also serves as the foundational mythic tale in the Kolbrin (therein called the story of Hurmanetar)

Ashurbanipal’s Library, British Museum.

The Flower Laced Palm Tree

Palm trees held a special place in ancient Israeli religion, being an important part of the Exodus myth, there bing12 wells and 70 palm trees in the first stop after Moses took Israel across the read sea and healed the waters in Exodus 15. Afterwards palm fronds were made to be an important part of the festival of Booths (Lev 23:40–41). Perhaps because of this, combined with the supreme importance of the Date Palm industry in ancient Israel’s economy, Solomon placed cheribum, lions and palm trees on the inner and outer walls of the temple, as well as on the panels covering the wheels of the portable water basins or arcs.

“He engraved cherubim, lions and palm trees on the surfaces of the supports and on the panels, in every available space, with wreaths [לֹיָה, garlands?] all around” (1 Kings 7:36)

More specifically, 2 Chronicles 3:5 says the Cherubim were associated with “palm trees and chains”. And that’s not chains like you’d keep a captive in, but וְשַׁרְשְׁרֽוֹת׃ or decorative jewelry chainwork, sometimes translated as “twisted chain work cordage” (stongs) or translated in NAS Ex 28:14 as filigree. Which if you’re not familiar with a flowered filigree, it’s basically a vine-like floral design. You can see examples here.

As in the picture above, filigrees are often associated with flowers, and those in Solomon’s temple appear to be no different. In 1 Kings 6:29, we see that open flowers were an important part of the chained or garlanded palm trees.

On the walls all around the temple, in both the inner and outer rooms, he carved cherubim, palm trees and open flowers. (1 Kings 6:29)

I’m not sure how to better describe the “Assyrian Trees of Life”, than the bible’s description of the corded/chained palms with open flowers of Solomon’s temple. And these would have been not just on the inside of the temple, but in the “outer rooms”, as well as on the panels of the wagons used for the movable arcs (ref)

The date palm and Cherub scenes were both inside the temple (completely coated with hammered gold), but also in the outer rooms.
The same types of reliefs were on each panel of the movable arcs. Making them especially easy to take back to Babylon. (find a pic of Assyrian relief, and Photoshop onto one of these (they likely hid the wheels)

In fact this same palm tree garland design is repeated in the two massive brass columns in the front of the temple. These were instructed to have massive lily pedals on top which likely mimicked palm fronds. In 1 Kings 7:15–22 it also states that the capitals or “caps” on the columns were to have “checker-work with wreaths of chain work” likely forming a pattern similar to the palm trees we’ve been talking about.

Ezekiel in his vision, which obviously drew on temple imagery, he adds the detail that these peculiar chained/flowered palms were between two cherubs. Cherubs which in some cases looked like a man and in other cases had the face of lions.

“18 All the walls were decorated with carvings of cherubim, each with two faces, and there was a carving of a palm tree between each of the cherubim. 19 One face, that of a man, looked toward the palm tree on one side. The other face, that of a young lion, looked toward the palm tree on the other side. The figures were carved all along the inside of the Temple, …from the floor to the top of the walls, including the outer wall of the sanctuary…” (Ezek 41:18–20)
25 The doors leading into the sanctuary were decorated with carved cherubim and palm trees, just as on the walls. And there was a wooden roof at the front of the entry room to the Temple. On both sides of the entry room were recessed windows decorated with carved palm trees. (Ezek 41:18–20)

Honestly its hard to see how the world has missed the obvious likelihood that these “Assyrian” reliefs of Ashurbanipal are actually plunder from Solomon’s temple, taken by Nebuchadnezzar II and placed in his palace.

Supposedly, An Ugallu—with the head of a lion, body of a man, and feet of an eagle, North Palace of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh, British Museum.
More protective Ugallu or supposed ‘lion spirits’. British Museum

now put a close up of the full cherubim scene… find this high detail. https://www.dreamstime.com/editorial-photo-anunnaki-tree-life-relief-panel-metropolitan-museum-art-manhattan-new-york-ny-ancient-near-eastern-assyrian-royal-image65121271

Pslams give a convincing background for both the lion slaying scenes and the dragon slaying scene. It says.

“3 Surely he will save you… 5 You will not fear the terror of night… For he will command his angels [Seraphim?] concerning you to guard you in all your ways; 13 You will tread on the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the [dragon]. (Pslams 91:13)

Supposedly, Ninurta with his thunderbolts pursues Anzû stealing the Tablet of Destinies from Enlil‘s sanctuary (Austen Henry Layard Monuments of Nineveh, 2nd Series, 1853)

Note also that many of the Cherubim have two sets of wings, or FOUR wings in addition to their arms, just as said in Ezekiel.

Each had… four wings, and under their wings was what looked like human hands [arms]. (Ezek 10:21)

Many of the motifs are combined in this following mural. With so called Assyrian winged genie who are actually biblical cheribum standing before the Tree of Life represented by the chained palm tree (talk about fertility of palm fertilizations), above it are the protective wings of the Lord

5 Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a man. 6 And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings. 7 And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a calf’s foot: and they sparkled like the colour of burnished brass. 8 And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four sides; and they four had their faces and their wings. 9 Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward. 10 As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion, on the right side: and they four had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle. 11 Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; two wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their bodies. (Ezekiel 1:5–11)

see https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/nimr_2/hd_nimr_2.htm
Supposedly, Assyrian Tree of Life motif or zigzaggy tree flanked by a pair of winged genii, British Museam

Note that in Isaiah he also utilizes temple motifs in his vision… He sees a beast with 6 wings which may well have been a motif somewhere in the temple, as existing reliefs vary in the number of wings from none, to four in one relief.

Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly. (Isaiah 6:2)

Talk about the Eagle thing that’s thought to be Persian, and how its found in Darius Wall and in Roman Mithraic temple’s. Understanding its true source in Judaism, helps tie these cultures together, as the Kolbrin shows the jewish roots of Mithra, and Darius, “worshipped the Lord” (ref) and was a follower of … The wings as a symbol of Jehovah in the temple can be seen in the following Psalms

7 In my distress I called to the Lord; I called out to my God. From his temple he heard my voice; 10 He parted the heavens and came down… 11 He mounted the cherubim and flew; he soared on the wings of the wind. (2 Sam 22:7–11)
4 He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge. (Psalm 91:4)
11 Like an eagle that stirs up its nest and hovers over its young, that spreads its wings to catch them and carries them aloft. 12 The Lord alone led him (Duet 32:11-12)

Close up of the image above. A faravahar above the tree of life in the “Assyrian” wall reliefs (actually stolen from Solomon’s temple)

“17 Make an atonement cover of pure gold… 18 And make two cherubim out of hammered gold at the ends of the cover. 19 Make one cherub on one end and the second cherub on the other; make the cherubim of one piece with the cover, at the two ends. 20 The cherubim are to have their wings spread upward, overshadowing the cover with them. The cherubim are to face each other, looking toward the cover. 21 Place the cover on top of the ark and put in the ark the tablets of the covenant law that I will give you. 22 There, above the cover between the two cherubim that are over the ark of the covenant law, I will meet with you and give you all my commands for the Israelites.” (Ex 25:17–22)

Israel’s Arc of the Covenant, decorated with 2 winged Cherubim (of unknown gender). God was to appear between the wings, just as symbolized with the faravahar.

Another hint that this was first the national symbol of Israel comes from the famous “Black Obelisk” of Assyria. On its sides, pictures and cuneiform text tell of 31 military campaigns led against five kingdoms conquered by Assyrian king Shalmaneser III (858–824 BC). On it, the symbol is used only in conjunction with Israel’s king Jehu. See more details of this event here.

Jehu, king of Northern Kingdom of Israel submits to Shalmaneser III of Assyria beneath the wing symbol of Israel’s god. British Museums.

Solidifying the argument that the Faravahar symbol was in fact the National Symbol of Israel is the Hezekiah bulla, found by archaeologist in Jerusalem in the rubble of a building just off the temple mount, destroyed by the Babylonians. Which clearly displays the Faravahar and the Egyptian Anke symbol, which although likely popular religious symbols of Egypt and the greater near-eastern religious culture in general, must have held special prominence for the Jewish

Text on the Hezekiah Bulla reads “of/belonging to Hezekiah [son of] Ahaz, king of Judah”

The existence of the “Zoroastrian Faravahar” in association with the Cheribum and Tree of Life is incredibly relevant. As the Kolbrin has MANY stories and sections which seem to tie Zoroastrian Mithraism to early Israeli beliefs. By considering the possibility that Solomon’s Temple is the root and source of the Faravahar, its adoption by Cyrus the Great & Darius actually makes more sense. Darius was a sycophant of Jewish culture and following Isaiah’s prophesy of him by name is said to have sought to spread Israeli belief. Note his promotion of the Jewish Lord God (Jehovah) in the following verses

“26 I decree that everyone throughout my kingdom should tremble with fear [worship] before the God of Daniel. For he is the living God, and he will endure forever. His kingdom will never be destroyed, and his rule will never end. 27 He rescues and saves his people; he performs miraculous signs and wonders in the heavens and on earth. He has rescued Daniel from the power of the lions.” (Daniel 6:26–27)

22 Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing: 23 “Thus says Cyrus king of Persia, ‘The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Whoever is among you of all his people, may the Lord his God be with him. Let him go up.’ (2 Chron 36:22-23)

With this understanding, now it makes sense why Darius & Cyrus’ new capital at Persepolis Iran, copies the Assyrian motifs! Not because he was a worshiper of the Assyrian gods or because Assyrians were Zoroastrians, but because Cyrus was a worshiper of David & Solomon’s monotheistic god, Jehovah. He then spread his belief of the Armenian blend of Judaism spoken of in the Kolbrin (which we call Zoroatrianism) throughout his empire by making it the state religion.

The same Faravahar at Persepolis, Iran. The capital of Cyrus the Great’s empire.
Assyrian-style lamassu mimicking the style of those at Nimrud and Dur-Sharrukin (but actually Cheribum from Solomon’s temple)

The Jerusalem Temple Complex would have been one of the most impressive in the ancient world. Here’s a well done illustration showing the scales of the differing buildings and courtyards laid out in the bible.


-Add this: This should be obvious from the ‘Assyrian Timber Transportation relief’ of Dur-Sharrukin in the Louvre. Which obviously is another relief stolen from Jerusalem (probably both the temple complex and Solomon’s palace) illustrating the construction of the temple and transport of Cedars of Lebanon used in the temple as described in 2 Chron 2:7-13

Assyrian Timber Transportation relief’ of Dur-Sharrukin in the Louvre

The Lion Hunt

The many lion hunt scenes from the Palace of Ashurbanipal also share a connection to Hebrew scripture. Not only would these reliefs explain the cultural nickname given to David and the Southern Kingdom as “the Lion of Judah”, it also … (finish — add some lion hunt scenes)

Supposedly, Ashurbanipal slaying a wounded lion as he has it by the throat. Lion Hunt, British Museum.

Kolbrin Temple Rites
The Kolbrin incorporates all these motifs into a secret temple rite which the “sons of light” participated in. (under construction. I’ll finish presenting the evidence here sometime. Also I need to finish adding the animal references below… and the Mithraism stuff — one of the primary reasons is that the priests of Judah would never parade these sacred motifs in front of the world. They would only be IN the temple. With the cherubs of the arc. Note that not only did Solomon place Cheribim over the Arc (1 Kings 6:27), they were on the temple doors (1 Kings 6:32), and all the walls.

“He overlaid the ceiling beams, doorframes, walls and doors of the temple with gold, and he carved cherubim on the walls.” (2 Chronicles 3:7)


“1.1 Herein are recorded sacred things, which should never be written, but the memory of man is like a storehouse made of straw… placing his trust fully in the protecting wings which are spread by the words issuing… 1.7 Look now at the great dark water mirror and see what is reflected there from the mists… 10. Even as it was in the Land of the Great River [Egypt], so let it be here. Let him not be cut off by distance.

1.29 O everlasting Kohar, take this man of goodness… he is the drop returning to the filled pitcher, the leaf returning to the tree [of life] 3.1 wearing white sandals and fine linen… many come bearing cakes of fine meal and barley cakes, large, fat-bodied fish and meats… honeywine in jars… his arm is strong and he issues his commands to the guardians… 3.8 If there be benevolent Life Shadows beyond the protective pale, they may enter…according to the rites of the Sons of Fire, and thus it shall be for those who enter the chambers of stone.

5.2 He has passed through the Wide Hall and through the Narrow Portal… He continues past the Place of Waiting Souls and sees the awaiting Kohars who will unite with the ascending spirits of men. He bears in his hand the Book of Life and glides over the pure pastures, past the bright dividing flame…”  5:4 The ferryman hesitates; he says, “Show me your token, that I may know you have truly passed the tests”… he is not of Earth, neither is he of Heaven. He is at the place where the two meet and intermingle.. He eats the fruit of the [sic] tree… 21.1 Lord of Life and Light, Creator of the Tree of Life, who made the herb and fruit to nourish men and grass to feed the cattle…  hear the cry of my spirit!  (Kolbrin, Sacred Registers, SCL ch 1-20)Read the rest of the amazing temple rite in the Kolbrin

TODO
-make a map showing every site these reliefs come from and a timeline of the kings which ruled from them AND then the reoccupation of their capitals by BABYLON, research and write out the narrative of how

OUTLINE (to flesh out)
-points us to Hoshkiah coming to Britain from Israel with Sons of Light, who’se timing is dated from references to ‘the scattering’ and ‘going north’. Also Amos is only prophet quoted. Also last reference to Egypt is Akenaten, and also a reference to David being contemporary with Ahmose and the Hysos, which helps us see some likely problems with radiocarbon dates, Egyptian chronology and the bible (which we already suspect)
-Then Hosea, points us to Mesoamerica, with the eagle and the serpent and the 52 weeks.
-Then the temple ceremony account gives us some real evidence that the eagle/falcon, serpent and satchel are closely associated with the Jewish temple ceremony & mysteries.
-Which makes us take a closer look at the Assyrian temple busts and reliefs that illustrate the Eagle, Bull, Lion and Anuku. –Which the dream told me — these are from Solomon’s temple. (something I refused over and over to believe)
-Which leads us to Ezekial and Kings/Chronicles which make it hard to dismiss, these are from Solomon’s temple! (walls were decorated inside and out with Cherubim, palms, flowers and pomegranates (show pics). Ezekial likely details the Cherubim are Eagle, Lion, Bull, face of man. And lots of wheels, just like the reliefs.
(now flesh this out)

The Kolbrin also gives an account of the Israeli sacred temple rites. A ceremony apparently performed to initiate inner circle priests not only in the temple at Jerusalem, but in satellite sanctuaries among the scattered people of Israel. Its not clear whether the same temple rite was used among the Northern Kingdom and Southern Kindom of Judah, but the resemblance of the motifs incorporated in the Kolbrin Temple rite leads us to believe that wall reliefs found in the Assyrian palace at Nimrud and Dur-Sharrukin, actually originated in the Jewish Temple.

This conclusion is not the obvious one, as current archaeological thought dates Sargon II’s temple of Dur-Sharrukin at about 720 BC. This conclusion was reached about the turn of the 20th century based on inscriptions mentioning Sargon. This inscription led to the conclusion that the palace of Dur-Sharrukin belonged to Sargon the Assyrian of the bible and therefore the agreed upon date falling in the Assyrian dynasty.

However, the Kolbrin offers a few details which suggest a reconsideration of this date. Primarily the afore mentioned temple rites of SCL 1-30, in which we see motifs which are so uncannily similar to the depictions in the reliefs of Dur-Sharrukin and Nimrud as to seem impossible a coincidence. Namely, The Tree of Life (SCL:21:1, 21:10, 33:20), A ‘date stone” referring to a date seed, which matches the Assyrian tree of life (SCL:32:4), Falcon or Eagle (ref), Bull ( SCL:1:41, 9:15) and Lion (SCL 33:10) as Cheribim.

-The two most notable places where the genies existed were Ashurnasirpal II’s palace Kalhu and Sargon II’s palace Dur-Sharrukin. (reference)
-Dur-Sharrukin contained a reference to Sargon II. Who sounded like the Sargon of Assyria, so the city was dated to that time. But the truth is, Sargon of Assyria was Sargon of Akkad!, and this reference is just Nebacenzer or someone related using the title. Sargon II, was a ‘cup-bearer’ which sound more like a Nehemiah-like servant, not the king.
-But there has been considerable debate concerning the true names and identity of these two cities. Early archaeologists identified the site with the ancient city of “Larissa” named in Greek historian Xenophon’s book Anabasis. Even today archaeologist find the site’s wall, ziggurat and stelas match perfectly with his description. HOWEVER, Xenophon in Bk. 3 Ch. 4 Verse 12 (and another historian), say the city “was besieged by the king of the Persians at the time when the Persians were seeking to wrest from the Medes their empire.” This equates the city with that sacked by Cyrus the Great (king of the Persians) in 557 BC! (see this amazing reference)
-On top of this, surviving Babylonian letters describing Dur-Sharrukin sound exactly like Nebechadnezzer and his Hanging Gardens (which have never been found), see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dur-Sharrukin#Description “On the central canal of Sargon’s garden stood a pillared pleasure-pavilion which looked up to a great topographic creation: a man-made Garden Mound. This Mound was planted with cedars and cypresses and was modelled after a foreign landscape” (see wiki)
-These two sites are home to the amazing wall reliefs of the Bull, Lion and Eagles with faces of a man. These motifs match exactly with Ezekiel’s description of the Cheribim of Solomon’s temple in Ezekial 9-10. In chapter nine he sees those who are coming to “execute judgement on the city” (Ezek 9:1–3). Then in an ethereal visionary experience, he sees the Cherubim carried off amidst a whirlwind of wheels and defiled eyes (Ezek 10:1–20). The four cherubim of the temple he describes as “the first face was the face of a cherub [or ‘bull’ see CEV], the second face the face of a man, the third the face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.” This is EXACTLY the description of the Assyrian wall relief Cheribs of Dur-Sharrukin and “Ninevah!” Why? Because these are not Assyrian capitals but the Babylonian capital of Nebecanezzer!

QUESTIONS TO STILL SOLVE:
-I still need to figure out the significance of these scenes… one is obviously lots of cedars of Lebanon, likely a fig tree in there too. Whats the monument commemorating?
-point out somewhere how the temple was meant to look like a man? Two columns being legs and like Daniel’s dream.
-Is the ‘standard inscription’ written on the panels original? (Some of it yes? Some of it no?) Is it all propaganda and graffiti from Nebuchadnezzar? From Omri? From David or Solomon? (ie. Ashur-nasir-pal II is one of those figures). Answer: Across every relief is similar writing called “the standard inscription.” Read about it here. You need to find the original sources for EVERY Assyrian king list, especially those with Ashur-nasir-pal I or II, and find out if its possible the floating chronologies are arrange wrong and Ashur-nasir-pal is earlier or later. (Note Ashur has Semitic origins, Ashur-dan is an especially biblical sounding king name with both parts one of the ’12 tribes’.)
-Is the library entirely from the temple, or a mixture of sources? Are the tablets originals, or did Daniel and the Jewish scribes transcribe them all into Babylonian cuneiform?
-Does Nebuchadnezzar’s madness match whats said in the Kolbrin of the unworthy attempting to be twice born? Is this why his successor abandoned it? Did he burry the palace too?
-Is Sargon the Great David and Hammurabi Solomon? Does much of our info on them come from the library?
-Many of these questions can be answered by reading the cuneiform chronicles of Assyria & Babylon, available at livius.org

-some of the best pictures (easy to screen capture): https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/nimr_2/hd_nimr_2.htm
-British museum has virtual tours, here and here. Others can be googled.
-see also the Louve’s site.

After writing this article, I found this youtube article with a great overview of the pale and cone motif. Mystery of the Sumerian Handbags SOLVED – YouTube

A Revised Egyptian Chronology. Errors in Early Iron Age through Bronze Age Radiocarbon Correlations.

Overview

Near-eastern prehistory is in need of a significant chronological overhaul. Egyptian & Babylonian timelines as well as global radiocarbon date correlations for our modern views of prehistory are off by at least 500 years. This largely because of previously unrecognized mistakes in the ancient Egyptian timeline which were then propagated into most other near-eastern prehistory timelines and even radiocarbon correlations curves.

These timeline mistakes were made as early as 70 AD in the writings of Josephus (and later Christian redactors of the Greco-Egyptian historian Manetho) whose desires to correlate biblical events such as Moses & the Exodus into Egyptian history caused them to correlate the Canaanite Hyksos of Egypt’s Second Intermediate Period with the freed Jews spanning from the Exodus throughout the conquest of Israel (1900-1500 BC). When in fact, the Hyksos in Avaris actually correlate with the post exilic period of 1400-1050 BC of Amalekites whose empire stretching into Nubia is then conquered for a short period by Saul & the Davidic Kingdom. This false correlation was then propagated into modern archaeology by early Christian scientists & enthusiasts who were enamored with the idea of many of the impressive Ramesean monuments being related to Biblical Egyptian stories. Ironically, because of that desire of early religiously motivated archaeologists, most prehistory scholars today do not see many of the accounts in the bible before about 850 BC as reliable history because the accepted timelines create so many problems with biblical accounts vs archaeological correlations.

My first premonitions for the need of a chronological adjustment came from early encounters with the numerous ‘repeats’ of events, empires and individuals in the near-east prehistoric record. Old Babylon vs. Neo Babylon. Old Assyria vs Neo Assyria. Mythical Ramesses & Seti vs the New Kingdom characters vs Persian references. Mythical Sargon vs Sargon II. Bronze age Nebuchadnezzar I vs Nebuchadnezzar II. Then my suspicions were truly validated when I began to compare the ancient Kolbrin text to true history. In its pages are amazing references to Egyptian & near-east history & myth with a specific reference equating a red haired Canaanite King (obviously David) warring with Pharaoh Ahmose/Thothmose.

Now even our radiocarbon correlation curve institutions have made the early Iron age Hallstatt radiocarbon anomaly (450-950 BC) into a plateau when it should be a cliff (rewrite, simplify). At around 500-850 BC, radiocarbon dates very quickly jump from nearly correct readings to 300-350 years too old! (c14 1050 BC = 750 BC) But because of the incorrect Egyptian dating, radiocarbon correlators who did in fact realize the need for correlation, but went the wrong direction! (c14 1050 BC = 1150-1350 BC!). Undoubtedly, very low CO2 levels played a part, with plants up taking lower amounts of c14 than the historic average during the early iron age & bronze ages. (put the details down in the article)

Note (rewrite and put this in body) A huge part of the mixup is the partially mythical story of the brothers Ramesses/Seti (also called Egypt). These brothers conquered from Egypt to Anatolia & Greece and became a powerful mythos behind the common ties of Greece, Phoenicia and Egypt. The original story may be as old as the great monuments of Egypt itself, but throughout Egyptian history, any pharaoh who expanded Egyptian territory into Anatolia took the title Rameses. This included Sesostris I (1800 BC – note that Herodotus mentions a carving of Sesostris in Nif Dagi, thought by Archaeologist to be Ramesses II), Kamose/Ahmose (1000 BC) who subjugated Israel & the Phoenicians, Amasis/Apries who conquered to the Euphrates. The title was then adopted by Darius & Alexander/Ptolemy to legitimize the Greco-Egyptian Empire.

Actual DateHistorically Known Empire or CultureArchaeologically Dated EquivalentArcheol. Date
1400-1000 BCAmalekites / Davidic KingdomEarly/Late Hyksos Dynasties 14-161725-1550 BC
1037-931 BCSaul/ David (&Jonatan)/ SolomonSaltis (Beon)/ Khyan (Jannas)/ Apophis (Apepi)1620-1550 BC
1069-609 BCThird Intermediate to Late PeriodEgyptian New Kingdom1550-1069 BC
911-609 BCNeo Assyrian EmpireMiddle Assyrian Empire (parts)1365–1050 BC
605-556 BCNeo Babylonian Dynasty (X)Babylon Dynasty IV & Sargonid Dynasty1153-609 BC
605-562 BCNebuchadnezzar II (same person as >)Nebuchadnezzar I1121-1100 BC
722-560 BCMedes/Babylonians/Early PersiansElam/Kassites1531-1155 BC
732-530 BCGreeks/Early PersiansSea Peoples/Hittites1292-1189 BC

Introduction

Near-eastern prehistory is a patchwork of ancient floating chronologies hashed together over the last 300 years on often contradictory data garnered from archaeological contexts (such as radiocarbon dates, king lists and monuments) combined with historical sources like the Bible, Eusebius/Africanus, Josephus, (quoting Manetho), Herodotus and more. Small revisions and adjustments to these correlations has been an ongoing process, worked on continually by many authors. However, only from time to time do authors attempt major revisions which reassess the very foundations that modern dating techniques are based on. In this paper I attempt to show that largescale global and regional fluctuations in the earth’s magnetic field have caused massive gaps and repeats in current prehistory paradigms which have not yet been addressed by any of the available radiocarbon calibration curves.

The primary evidence of these radiocarbon fluctuations are seen in the well known ‘wiggles’ or variations in ancient radiocarbon levels such as seen in the Hallstatt Plateau. Radiocarbon variation during this era have made the dating of artifacts with known dates from 800-400 BC nearly impossible. Archaeologists familiar with this radiocarbon phenomena have referred to the Hallsatt Plateau as “the 1st millennium BC radiocarbon disaster” (see James, 19933) During this period the geomagnetic field in the Near East was characterized by “rapid changes and high intensity values, including several spikes of more than twice the intensity of today’s field.” (see Manning, Vaknin, Ben-Yosef, etc.)

The anomaly is named after the late Bronze Age Hallstatt period in which it most notably manifests as well as the salt mines of Hallstatt Austria which form the type locality for the site. Disturbingly, this period of geomagnetic/radiocarbon instability was not found by dendrochronologists or geochronologists, but only by archaeologists working with near-eastern settings of known age. Predominately Biblical sites with archaeological evidence which could not be confused from historical contexts. This means, were it not for the fact that archaeologists positively knew the sites actual date and reported the faulty radiocarbon result, the false age would likely never been discovered.

Furthermore, I believe that this anomalous “plateau” has been misinterpreted by geochronologists and its logical effects on Bronze Age dates ignored. Instead of a “plateau”, I believe the Hallstatt anomaly actually a general cliff in the dating regimen, with a number of small range series spikes. Spikes which causes artifacts with true ages between 800-400 BC to yield dates of 3000-1400 BC! And although the phenomena is recognized on the “historical end” in settings known from the bible to date to 800-400 BC, it is often missed in archaeological contexts without positive historical markers.

“When dealing with the period after ~800 BCE, our archaeomagnetic dating is particularly useful, due to the plateau in the radiocarbon calibration curve which limits high resolution dating. During this period the geomagnetic field in this region was characterized by rapid changes and high intensity values, including several spikes of more than twice the intensity of today’s field”

(In Reconstructing biblical military campaigns using geomagnetic field data, Yoav Vaknin, 2022)

Thus we get various sites or artifacts with a radiocarbon dates around 2400 BC which actually date to around 800 BC. Even the type locality of Hallstatt Austria for which the radiocarbon plateau is named shows a suspicious bimodal array of dates covering not only the early Iron Age of 800-500 BC, but recently a middle Bronze age array of dates from 1200-800 BC have manifest in the area which I suspect are actually just anomalous dates from one of the several radiocarbon peaks which existed during the seventh to ninth century BC. (see Agerskov et al and Grabner et al)

Dipole moment or general magnetic field polarity for the last 9000 years (from Nilsson, et al, 2022). The authors note the sharp drop in strength at 600 BC (400-900 BC), which coincides with the Hallstatt Platea. Note similar rapid changes in dipole strength occur at c14 dates of 3000-4000 BC & 6500-7000 BC which likely correspond to similar unrecognized radiocarbon anomalies. Note also the 650/700 year cycles.

Nilsson, Suttie, Stoner & Muscheler. Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light on future evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly. Nature, 2022 (great read)

.

HOW OFF COULD RADIOCARBON DATES BE?

  • The latitudinal variation of carbon dioxide and radiocarbon is relatively small (425ppm vs 435ppm in co2, and __), whereas the variation for vulcanism can be enormous. (As much as 50,000 ppm co2 near volcanoes/trapps). Localized date pollution by volcanic outgassing/eruptions such as Thera/Iceland, should be taken very seriously.
  • If the present atmospheric carbon dioxide level (near double pre-industrial levels) was experienced in the past (lets say at 600 BC from an eruption), then the radiocarbon date from a sample of that age would be effectively halved. So, the actual c14 ratio would be HALF the expected ratio, giving a date of 8332 BP or 6332 BC! (This delusion is called the Suess Effect)
  • The bomb effect on radiocarbon was so powerful (doubling pre-bomb levels), that a sample from its peak in 1965 would date to 5,730 IN THE FUTURE. Meaning, that nearly 6000 years would have to pass before that sample even gave a ‘modern’ date. But it only lasted about 50 years. So we can assume that if massive CME’s created spikes in the past, dates problems should only last a few decades, and give completely anomalous dates.
  • So for the Ice Age to give anomalously OLD dates, then there must have been LESS radiocarbon (from a stronger magnetic field) or MORE carbon dioxide. But it would have to be SUBSTANTIALLY STRONGER. For instance The field has decayed 10% in the last 100 years. And if we suppose a 20% stronger field in 600 BC, samples would have 5% less radiocarbon which would cause them to appear 425 years older. (AI generated calculations). So to assume dates that are from 720 BC are giving erroneous dates of 2200 BC, we’d have to assume the field was like 60% stronger than the current field strength. (which if the earth wobbled at Hezekiah could we assume that would be the effect?)
  • Similarly, for the ice age to have ended at Moses at 1500 BC, but give radiocarbon dates of 9000 BC… then there would have to be WAY STRONGER MAGNETIC FIELD. So we’d have to hypothesize that the growing earth, both released massive amounts of carbon dioxide AND massively increased the magnetic field strength.
  • Carbon Dioxide levels in the Cambrian and Cretaceous are thought to be as high as 2-6000ppm, so about 16x ‘normal’ (preindustrial) levels. AI calculates that a sample from 1800 BC with those levels of carbon dioxide (6,000ppm) would yield a date of 25,300 BP. (with no change in magnetic field strength). So completely within reason. (2,000ppm would yield a date of 16,250 BP)

.

.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION FROM THIS POINT ON!

.

Or… [give a few more examples from my repeating culture chart up top and then propose the idea that the cause has been staring us in the face with the biblical account of the “sundial of Ahaz” which points to a rapid true polar wandering event (TPW), which I believe is only one example of many episodes of axial instability. Something which caused sea travel across the Atlantic and pacific to grind to a halt, because of increased volcanism on the spreading ridges. Also, that this is a 700 yr cycle with known occurrences at: Moses 1500 BC, Hezekiah 780/722 BC, 33 AD, 774/5 AD/820 AD, 1482 AD, and the next due around 2200 AD, major instability seen in 586 BC, Babylonian burning of Jerusalem]

In this article I offer a fairly large revision created by large scale repeating patterns I’ve noticed over my decades of research supported by new information from Britain’s mysterious and controversial ancient history book, The Kolbrin. Although dismissed by many who don’t understand it. The Kolbrin contains some of the most impressive Near-eastern and British history of any book in its spurious mystical-history genre.

One of the most intriguing historical references in the Kolbrin is a section suggesting that Pharaoh Ahmose (called Atmose, SOF 6:9) was a contemporary with King David and Hiram of Tyre mentioned in the Bible (ref). The reference reads as following:

“In the days when Hiram [of Tyre] came to Egypt, the Pharaoh Athmos ruled. In those days, Egypt was at war with the Abramites, for their great red-headed king had committed adultery with the wife of a prince of Paran. The remorseful king reaped as he had sown, for his favourite daughter was ravished by her own brother, and his wives were humiliated and ravished before the eyes of all men.”

(Sons of Fire:6:9)

Although many Pharaohs have used titles similar to Ahmose (son of iah/Jah), The thing that makes this reference so impressive is the way that following its logic ties together several other historical parallels between Egyptian Chronology and the Bible.

For instance. Because Ahmose is well known as the is the first Pharoah of the 300-400 year long 18th Dynasty who freed the Egyptian Delta from the mysterious late Hyksos. Placing Ahmose (who is usually dated to about 1550 BC) as a contemporary of David
-means the hysos were Israelite (and earlier amalakites), which the kolbrin mentions
-means the amarna letters match hoshea
-means the nubian pharoes are likely the same as the ethiopian menationed in the bible AND the 25th dynasty ethiopians
-explains why akenhaten was a monotheist, because they were allied with Israel from david’s time but now began to side with the assyrians
-explains why Herodotus seems to match with Menetho’s amasis myth with Greeks and the Ramesses/Sethos brothers? (rethink this logic)
-puts the ramesses as ptolemies! (column in alexandria, lots of other temples, and an understanding of Ptolmies claim to the throne because of the legend of Sethos and Ramesses who founded lydia? in Greece and was a greek sympathizer.

Kolbrin offers a few other chronological markers to correlate Thutmose II (called Tathomasis, MAN:34:29) and Akhenaten (called Nabihaton, MAN:34:29) to the same dynasty.
This adjustment pushes the end of the Eighteenth dynasty to around 700 BC solving the mystery of why the Greek Historian Herodotus places Sethos of the 19 dynasty at around 700 BC, as well as why every retelling of Manetho’s work omit the Pharaohs of the 20th Ramesside dynasty. And why Egyptian temple chronology inscriptions like the Abydos, and Saqqara lists stop at Ramesses II, yet match almost perfectly with the Egyptian Menetho’s work who lived during Ptolemy II.

Fix this animation. its timeline is wrong.

All of these points of evidence point toward a historical parallel or synchronicity which I have been suspecting for years. Which is that the Ramesside dynasty and the Ptolemaic dynasty are actually one and the same.

coming soon: a correlation chart like this one, but with the dates, dynasties and famous pharaohs more prominent..

The Ptolemaic dynasty which includes Pharaohs Ptolemy I to X or so, is known from Greek and Roman historical sources [note x] and is therefore dated historically from 332 to 45 BC. The Ramesside dynasty on the other hand, also includes Pharaohs I to X (Ramesses I to XI) but information for them is derived almost entirely from radiocarbon dated archeological sources giving dates from 1190 to 1077 BC.

Each of these dynasties were among the most prolific builders in Egyptian history, strangely building on the same sites and temples throughout Egypt [fn]. In fact, almost without fail, known Ptolemaic motifs or writing will show up randomly within major Ramesside buildings and vise versa. “Strangely”, ALL of the resplendent Tombs of the Rameses have been found and carbon dated. But for some “unknown reason”, ZERO of the famed “more recent” Ptolemy tombs have been found. In fact historical king lists derived from Herodotus as well as Manetho (a historian commissioned by Ptolemy II) do not include the Ramesside 20th dynasty in them at all! Instead in the Manetho accounts of Josephus, Eusebius & African we are given dynastic lists which match almost perfectly with king list on Rameses temples, with a few non-Theban disjointed dynasties thrown in after. I see this as clear evidence that the king lists on the Ramesside temples of Abydos and Karnak which radiocarbon date to around 1100 BC, actually came from Ptolemies’ historian Manetho who lived around 300 BC.

Even the famous Lighthouse of Alexandria, historically known to have been by Ptolemy II built around 270 BC, when recently excavated curiously contained “half a dozen columns carved in the Egyptian style had markings dating back to Ramses II, nearly a millennium before Alexandria was founded.” (see Smithsonian article) This phenomena of mismatched artifacts of Ptolmaic/Ramesside periods, if far more the rule than the exception. (ref)

“Curiously, half a dozen columns carved in the Egyptian style had markings dating back to Ramses II, nearly a millennium before Alexandria was founded.”

This phenomena of Ramesside artifacts being mixed in with Ptolemaic artifacts is incredibly common.

And the strange repeated near-east history does not stop there. Sargon of Akkad, radiocarbon dated to xxx is likewise unbelievably similar to Sargon the Assyrian historically dated to xxx. And again Sargon’s palace has not been found. Although his brothers mask…

Likewise entire cultures have come to “repeat” in our modern chronologies as historically dated sites and artifacts conflict with radiocarbon & Egyptian dated

————————————————

Ancient variations in ancient native carbon-dioxide and radiocarbon levels are known to skew radiocarbon dates for given time periods. This is something all scientists well studied in radiocarbon dating understand. Several calibration curves (such as IntCal) have been created to attempt to ‘correct’ for these variations in order to translate a laboratory ‘radiocarbon date’ to a true calendar date. In this paper I propose that a previously undetected large variation in atmospheric carbon dioxide occurred from at least the onset of the Christian era to around the second millennium BCE in the Mediterranean region. This variation skews dates for the given period up to a 1000+ years causing our modern models of pre-Christian history to essentially ‘repeat’– with written historic empire and dynasty sequences from about 100-900 BCE, duplicating in an artificial ‘radiocarbon dated history’ dating from about 900-4000 BCE.

[—add illustration here or at top with the IntCal correlation curve next to my proposed correlation curve —]

Thus the well known historically dated empire and dynasty sequences of the Grecian, Median, Persian, Neo Babylonian and Neo Assyrian Empires, completely repeat with an identical radiocarbon dated empire and dynasty sequence of the ‘sea peoples’, Hittite, Hyksos, Old Babylonian or Sumerian and Akkadian Empires. I propose that these latter empires are identical to the former. This repetition of history caused by insufficiently calibrated dates, of course should have been obvious to the scientific community of the mid twentieth century, however I suggest that Early Christian archaeologists and historians were eager to have the tales of the bible validated by archaeological findings. And it just so happened that radiocarbon dates for many of the most monumental architecture there (New Kingdom) happened to radiocarbon date to about the time that the Israelites in the Bible were supposedly slaves in that land. Additionally the prestige and ability to publish when one finds archaeological evidence of ‘new and previously unknown empires’ as well as a lack of general understanding among archaeologist at the tenuous results of uncalibrated radiocarbon dates caused them to overlook the obvious ‘repetition’ of history that these radiometrically dated archaeological finds were creating in the broader view of prehistory.

So even though Manetho who was commissioned by Ptolemy III around 240 BC, starts his famous ‘history of Egypt’ going back in time from Rameses II, archaeologist discarded the obvious fact that Rameses II WAS IN FACT Ptolemy II, in favor of the idea that Rameses (one of the most prolific builders in Egyptian history) was actually the Rameses of the bible’s story of Moses. Forget the fact that Rameses dynasty has countless similarities to the Ptolemaic dynasty or that the second most important Persian/Egyptian historian Herodotus says nothing of the Rameses New Kingdom dynasty. [rewrite… this isn’t true]

These mistakes took hold because of a disastrous coincidence. This being that radiocarbon dates just happened to somewhat correlate in certain areas with the erroneous histories of Eusebius, and Jerome who cherry picked & added to the works of Manetho in order to create an Egyptian & Mesopotamian timeline that fit the bible. [fn. he himself says in the beginning of his book ‘Chronicles’, that he was seeking to “establish how long before the life-giving revelation [of Christ] Moses and the Hebrew prophets who succeeded him lived and what they, filled with the divine spirit, said before [the time of Christ]” (Chronicles, p.5) However, a simple look at Josephus ‘Against Apion‘, who Eusebius quotes at length shows that Eusebius almost certainly added to both Josephus and Manetho’s king list every dynasty after the New Kingdom. Its obvious Josephus’ Egyptian history was trying to wrongly prove that the ‘Shepard Kings’ of Manetho were actually the Jews of Moses from around 1600 BC. When in fact they are actually Persians of 500 BC. (rewite this whole thing. Outline it.) Note on pharoe.se how many king lists start with Rameses/Seti. The Abydos, the , Why? Because, like Manetho they were comisioned by Ptolemy to legitimize his dynasty!] So this is the troubled foundation that Willard Libby and radiocarbon dating entered the scene on. And because the radiocarbon dates for the famed Ramesses and Atmose dynasties somewhat loosely matched the “historical” dates (the historical dates have since been changed by over 500 years, so I use the term ‘loosely’, loosely. [I need to compare the dates of the artifacts found in this analysis of libby’s work, (here’s the original chart from Libby, see this too) As well as many taken since in this work as in this study. And find a pre-Libby Egyptian chronology from the 40‘s just before Libby and see how they actually correlate. I’ll bet they hardly do AT ALL, but I MUST prove this. And I need to write out this paragraph better

But because it roughly correlated with the biblical story and false or skewed historic sequences built on poor biblical correlations they ran with it. And since then the field of prehistory has been built on so many studies based on circular reasoning and those initial false histories that the entire scientific community has simply explained away the thousands of examples where historically dated and radiometrically dated artifacts seem like they should belong to the same culture or timeframe and yet do not. An occurrence which has given rise to confusing nomenclatures like old Babylon vs neo-Babylon (ie. historically dated Babylon vs. radiocarbon dated Babylon)

Eusebius, one of the three sources we have of Menetho, says of the account,

Perhaps it happened that there were many kings in Egypt at the same time. They say that some of them were kings of Thinis, some of Memphis, some of Sais, and some of Ethiopia; and there were yet others in other places. And as it seems that these dynasties ruled each in its own [time, but] no, it is very unlikely that they ruled in succession to each other. Rather, some of them ruled in one place, and others in another place. Therefore the increase in the number of years can be explained in that way. But we will leave this matter, and proceed to the details of the chronology of the Egyptians… (Eusebius. p.137)

———————————————————————————————————————-

LIST OF POSSIBLE DUPLICATED HISTORY (things that seem strangely repetitive)

———————————————————————————————————————-

Hyksos Pharoah Khyan holds an enormous ritual feast just before the abandoment of his palace, filling several 5 m (16 ft) wide pits with animal bones and thousands of pottery fragments in consequence. Some of these fragments came from an array of vessels produced by the Kerma culture of Nubia (allies). This sounds a lot like Saul or David. Both David & Solomon conquer from the Euphrates to Gath & the Border of Egypt. (Joshua 15:20,47 / Isaiah 27:12; 1 Chron 18:1,3; 1 Kings 4:21)

The Sea peoples “Philistine” called Peleset (Egyptian: pwrꜣsꜣtj) or Pulasati from the Temple of Ramses III at Medinet Habu (1150 BC) likely match with Phoenician/Palestine groups mentioned in Assyrian texts from 720-600 BC like Iamani of Ashdod. The biblical early Philistines & Amalekites were Hyksos. (and ruled all the way to Memphis at one point)

Hammurabi as Solomon (1770 BC = 990 BC) – NOPE

-Some have noted the distinct similarities between not only Hammurabi’s law code but also his songs and biblical law and psalms is far to strong to be coincidence. Many historians dismiss the account of 1 Chronicles 18 and 2 Samuel 8 where David is said to have conquered the land to the Euphrates River. However several authors see extensive evidence for this occurrence in a correlation with Zimri-Lim & Hammurabi . See Hammurabi and Zimri-Lim as Contemporaries of Solomon by Damien Mackey
-there are strong similarities between the goring ox of Exodus 21 and the same occurrence in what is called LH 251 of Hammurabi’s Code. Just as striking are the contrasts between the Torah Law and Hammurabi’s Code (see: LH 16, 19, 106, 197, 209, 210, 229 and 230) in the laws of runaway slaves, the rejection of cross-generational civil punishment, and even the famous lex talionis.

Hyksos & Ahmose I as Amalekites & David (1570 = 1000 BC)

-There is overwhelming archaeological and epigraphical evidence showing that the Kolbrin not only solves the identity of Manetho & Josephus’ Hyksos Shepherd Kings. But also that the Egyptian timeline is in need of revision.

Josephus goes to great lengths to try and prove the Hyksos as captive Israelites under Moses. But the Kolbrin has this to say, “In the days when Hiram [of Tyre] came to Egypt, the Pharaoh Athmos ruled. In those days, Egypt was at war with the Abramites, for their great red-headed king had committed adultery with the wife of a prince of Paran. The remorseful king reaped as he had sown, for his favourite daughter was ravished by her own brother, and his wives were humiliated and ravished before the eyes of all men.”

(Sons of Fire:6:9)

The identity of this “red haired” king as David is easily recognized from both the description of his red hair in 1 Samuel 16:12 as well as the story of the rape of his daughter Tamar by Amnon her half brother in 2 Samuel 13:1-21.

Archaeologists have failed to find any evidence that the Davidic kingdom achieved any of the size or importance given it in the Bible, but if David is in fact the king who warred with Egypt during the reign of one called Athmos (Ahmose I?), then what Manetho says works well the the biblical record (the current version of which came from Alexandria in the same decade as Menetho!). In Against Apion, Josephus quotes Manetho in stating that the first shepherd king’s name was Salatis who conquered both upper and lower Egypt and even built a palace in Memphis. He left garrisons throughout Egypt building a primary outpost in Avaris, which he walled and left 240,000 men to keep it.

After his death it states that his successor Beon (Soloman?) reigned 44 years, a series of five puppet kings/governess are named who all together hold Egypt as a vassal for some 278 years.

Finally, Manetho says, Under Tethmosis (thought to be Ahmose I), the kings of Thebes and the other parts of Egypt “made an insurrection against the shepherds, and that there a terrible and long war was made between them.” He says further, “That under a king, whose name was Alisphragmuthosis, the shepherds were subdued by him, and were indeed driven out of other parts of Egypt, but were shut up in a place that contained ten thousand acres; this place was named Avaris.” Manetho says, “That the shepherds built a wall round all this place, which was a large and a strong wall, and this in order to keep all their possessions and their prey within a place of strength, but that Thummosis the son of Alisphragmuthosis made an attempt to take them by force and by siege, with four hundred and eighty thousand men to lie rotund about them” (Against Apion, Bk 1 v14)

As unbelievable as this account is, especially in supposing Saul or David to be the first Shepherd king, its hard to dispute the evidence of the scores of severed hands found in Averis around the time of Ahmose I. (see article on it here). Compare that to 2 Samuel 4:12 which tells us, “And David commanded his young men, and they killed them and cut off their hands and feet and hanged them beside the pool at Hebron”. This may have been a common practice and thus coincidence. OR this may be evidence that David was in Avaris during the reign of Ahmose. Archaeologists say of Averis, “At Avaris, the evidence shows a small group of settlers from the Canaan/Syria area settled on virgin ground, rapidly grew to a huge population”

What’s I propose is that the Hyksos were Amalekites and Canaanites that continually fought Israel until David conquered or killed them all. And the last few Hyksos were actually David, Solomon and Rehoboam (who was then conquered by Egypt and Jeroboam after 4 years). Another point of evidence might be Sheshi, the Hyksos king thought to be Manatho’s Salitis, he leaves hundreds of some of the first Scarabs to appear throughout Canaan, Egypt and Nubia. David is known to have allied with Nubia, and Solomon allied with Egypt. Why is ‘the seal of Solomon such a big legend? A match?

There’s more evidence here..  Read and add it.

(Note this also suggests then, that David conquered to the rivers (Mesopotamia).. Judah including egypt, and the northern kingdom including all of Syria and perhaps parts of Assyria?

-Tell el-Dab near Avaris (northeast delta) has a population explosion during 1590 and 1570 BCE, could this be evidence of David taking it from the Amalekites? (this is speculative, learn more)

Hyksos as Early Persians (or David’s Kingdom in one instance?) –NOPE

Summary of Correlations
-Note that the term ‘Hyksos’ is used on the tomb of Petosiris to designate Artaxerxes III the Persian. ref
-The Kolbrin tells of a war between Egypt and the Abramites who were led by a red haired king who perfectly fits the description of David in the days of the Phoenician Hiram and Pharaoh Ahmose. (although names like Ahmose might have been re-used over and over, and red hair kings who cut off hands might have been common for centuries)
-Ahmose is well known as being the Pharaoh who drove out the Hyksos. (he should be the Pharaoh who let them in)
-Manetho says Hyksos were Jewish (Cananite?) aggressors (give all details of this). Josephus tried (poorly) to prove they were captives.
-Archaeology shows: They spoke Aramaic & Canaanite dialects.
-They likely lived close by and were prolific, because they had been migrating into Egypt for a few centuries. ref ref.
-War in the Hyksos takeover could have been partly minimal. Instead they used diplomacy and expansion. ref
-They had a custom of cutting off hands as a bounty, Just as 2 Samuel 4:12 says David did. ref.
-They seem to have been in alliance with the Nubians of Ethiopia (ref)
-The independent Thebans came to battle the Hyksos (because of an argument over hippos) and were defeated (is this in the bible?) ref
-They are the ones who bring the compound/composite bow and horse chariot to Egypt. Their Asiatic technology advances Egypt. ref
-they wore bright colored Canaanite clothing. ref (1900 BC to 1750 BC)

Behistun Inscription lists the lands conquered and ruled by Darius the Great. It includes Egypt. (and lists his genealogy)
-Isaiah 44:28 reads: “says of Cyrus ‘He is My shepherd, And he will carry out all My desire’.”.
-Be sure in the paper to note that Sumerian kings in general were known ash shepherd kings. Two kings on the Sumerian King list are literally called ‘shepherds’, “Etana, the shepherd, who ascended to heaven and consolidated all the foreign countries” and “Lugalbanda the shepherd.” Urukagina who reigned seven years in Lagash around 2375 B.C is also called a shepherd king.

Ninteenth Dynasty Correlations Overview
-It seems unlikely that the 19the dynasty is cohesive. It is likely missing people and time. The question is where? I suspect the biginning (after Ahmose, because I’ll bet their two of them), Middle (ideas?) and End (Seti could be pre-Alexander?)

Ahmose & Pinedjem II as Contemporary of David (1550 =1000 BC)
-The Tomb/Mummy of Ahmose I (1549–1524 BC) is thought to have ‘been relocated from its original burial place… and re-wrapped’ in the 21st dynasty because the name of Pinedjem II (990-976 BC.) is on his wrappings! (ref) More likely Pinedjem II was Ahmose’ high priest, or his father Pinedjem I (-1032 BC), again making him a contemporary of David like the Kolbrin says.
-In fact the mummies of pharaohs Ahmose I, Amenhotep I, Thutmose II, Thutmose III, Ramesses I, Seti I, Ramesses II, and Ramesses IX were ALL put in Pinedjem II’s tomb! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinedjem_II)
-Note that Ahmose is credited with bringing war horses to Egypt. (ref) Its thought this technology came from the Hyksos because of evidence from Avaris. (ref). This works with the fact that the bibles first mention is of the Canaanite’s (king Jabin, Judges 4) surrounding Israel. (ref, ref) The first use BY Israel seems to be David stealing 1000 chariots & 100 horses from King of Zobah at the Border of the Eurphratees (1 chron 18:3-6, 2 Sam 8:3–6), which Solomon multiplies into 12,000 horses (1 Kings 10:26). Only by Persian times are war-horses ubiquitous.

Egyptian Syria Kadesh as Biblical Gaza Kadesh? (1506 – 1274 BC = 722 – 600 BC) PROBABLY NOT
-First problem is there’s three of them. One in Negiv, one in southeast Gaza, and one in Syria. So its confusing.
-King Hoskiah comes from here in Kolbrin. (SOF 7. probably the Gaza one on the border of Egypt)
-Thutmosis first battles Mitanni there in 1504 BC. Armana letter EA189 tells of the Habiru taking the city and then mayor loyal to Pharaoh taking it back around 1350 BC. Seti I with Ramesses II his son retakes it & Carchemish from Hittites in 1306 and then 1274 BC. These are all believed to be the Syrian Kadesh. BUUT Ahmose I, Tuthmosis III and Ramesses III are all known to have fought important battles in Gaza Kadesh..
-A major link is Ptolemy II’s epic battle of Raphia/Gaza (which is likely Ramesses II’s Kadesh) which could be the same as Ramesses II
-Nebuchadnezzar II was defeated against the Egyptian army under pharaoh Necho II at Migdol near Gaza Kadesh, which he later takes in 568 BC. And Cambyses I looses to Egypt there in 529 BC.

—————– radiocarbon date bump? (older) ——————–

Sargon of Akkad as Sennacherib/Sargon II of Assyria (2200 BC = 722 BC) NOPE

-Several rulers take the title of ‘Sargon of Akkad’, causing much confusion.
-Might the pole shift of Ahaz in 736 BC have cause radiocarbon dates to get OLDER again for a time? Or is Sargon just dated wrong?
-Sargon the Great of Akkas founds the Akkadian empire in (2334–2279) is almost certainly the same person as Sennacherib of neo-Assyria (705-681 BC). Note that Sargon the Great (of Akkad) is known mostly from Assyrian tablets from the 700’s !!!! Much info of him comes from a “Neo-Assyrian text from the 7th century BC purporting to be Sargon’s autobiography”. His name is “identical to the name of the Neo-Assyrian king Sargon II” (
Sennecherib/Sargon II makes Nineveh his glorious capital, but Sargon of Akkad’s capital hasn’t been found, nor have any contemporary documents of his life! Why? Because Sargon of Akkad is an invention to explain the radiocarbon and Egyptian chronology discrepancies found in archaeology. (see chronology of the near east)
(note: Shalmaneser V is the one who carried off Israel in 722 BC)

-This discrepancy is almost certainly caused by a volcano or major global climate change event giving rise to a major marine reservoir effect in the near east or global changes in carbon reservoirs.
-Archaeology in the city of Elba (home of the Elba Tablets) shows three destructions at 2500-2300 BC reportedly by Sargon of Akkad. A second destruction dates to 2050-1950 BC, a third at 1600 BC by Hittites and never recovers. On a circular Tel dates same as great pyramids and Stonehenge
-This is fitting, suggesting Assyrian war drove the builders of Stone Hinge to Britain at the same time as Hoskiah and the Sons of Light. Around 720 BC.

Mari in Syria Destroyed by both Sargon and Hammurabi, is largely dated by radiocarbon (and 25k tablets found in its library), is a great place to sort out who Sargon and Hammurabi are. I think in this case Hammurabi is actually Darius? re-using the old title for Solomon. Ḫapiru (“Hebrews”) mentioned but so also remarkably are the Banu Yamina (“Benjaminites”) which they say lived NORTH of Mari (showing ancient Israel’s boundaries larger than supposed).
-It’s relationship to Tel Hazor is another important key, as Hazor is mentioned in the Mari Tablets, Amarna letters, Annals of Thutmose II, Anastasi papyrus AND Egyptian Execration text. Although I feel like its likely Tel Hazor is NOT the same as the ancient, the records speaking of it should help to correlate dates.

Thutmose III as Necho II-probably no (1479 – 1425 BC = 610–595 BC) NOPE
-they both fight battles in many similiar places. Particluarly against the nubians
-Necho II works on the Suez canal and Tuthomse II at least has a residence out there…
-They both are the ONLY pharoahs to cross the Euphrates! (because Necho was helping the Assyrians fight the rising Babylonians)
-They both fight in the Battle of Megiddo! (take Megiddo and control the region. 1457 BC vs. 609 BC)
-see Defacing of Monuments for thutmose vs Necho

Thutmose III Battle of Megiddo as Necho II Battle of Megiddo?-probably no (1457 = 609 BC)
-This might be the best example of why these two are the same person. They both have epoch “battle of megiddos”. These two battles with the same name and same location are believed to be two separate events simply because one is dated archaeologically w/ Egyptian history and the other biblically. You can read about them here and here
Or see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tel_Megiddo#Late_Bronze_Age

The Armana Letters as Letters Between Ethiopia and Rulers of Judah from 2 Kings 17:4. (1352 BC = 720 BC) YES!
These letters provide the best opportunity to revising Egyptian chronology of the 18th dynasty. These letters attest to a very strong Egyptian state which allies with Canaan as well as Turkey & Babylon. The main aggressor being the Hirbu who seemed to be a raiders.
Letter EA287 is a great example where the ruler of Jerusalem begs for help from Kushite archers of the Amarna Egyptian kings. Compare that to 2 Kings 19:9 & Isaiah 37:9 where we’re told that the “King of Ethiopia (Kush), waged war against Sennacherib in reign of King Hezekiah” (about 716–687 BC) and 2 Kings 17:4 that says that king Hoshea (730-721 BC) sent letters to “So, King of Egypt”. So is often erroneously attributed to Osorkon IV who ruled nothing… but is FAR more likely Oros or Shebitko (who are likely the same person), even though one is the father of 18th dynasty Akhenaten and the other the 25th dynasty Nubian Pharaoh who fought Sennacherib.
-In the Bible, Ethiopians/Cushites are presented as ruling Egypt all the way from Hezekiah ~720 BC and Isaiah (Isa 18-20, 2 Kings 19) to presumably just before Josiah and the Pharoah Necho II around 620 BC. I believe archaeologists mistake the Assyrians of Nineveh who were actually Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar II. Jeremiah & Ezekiel prophesy of his conquering of Egypt, but because of the mix-up, historians/archaeologists don’t believe Babylon every conquered Egypt. Archaeologists believe the 25th dynasty Cushites gained control of Egypt by aligning with the Assyrians around 720 BC. But I’m pretty sure its actually the Babylonians, who Josiah was aligned with. 25 & 26 dynasties are probably somewhat concurrent as Egypt, just like Israel is in a north/south civil war going back and forth on whether to align with Assyria or Babylon. These correlate with the 18 dynasty which is also mixed between Monotheistic Cushite and Egyptian Pharaohs.
-The Kolbrin explains that the Monotheism of Akhenaten had long been part of Egyptian religion but hidden from the commoners who held deeply entrenched polytheistic beliefs. The Armana Letters show the growing power and influence of these Nubian rulers and their treaties with those of Canaan and Babylon.
Insights from the Armana Letters:
-lots of letters from Asqalon king Widia. And Ashkalon was taken by Sennacherib and Nebuchadnezzar. (supposedly later in history but I say actually during the neo-Assyrian & neo-Babylonian conquests)
-five letters to Lakis (Lachish, Israel), really pertinent because seven Lachish Letters were found there dating to likely just before Nebuchadnezzar in 588BC. (but these are in paleo-Hebrew & Amarna was cuneiform, There’s also a Lachish Relief in Assyria which is cuneiform I think). NOTE THAT LACHISH is the Lachish reliefs show this is where Sennacherib (actually Nebuchadnezzar II) attacked Jerusalem from… further proving that Lachish was smartly aligned with Babylon, but Jerusalem flipped allegiance and sided with Pharaoh.

Sartrap Aryandes & The New Kingdom.(524 BC = 1020 BC) NOPE! In the final days of Egypt new kingdom (1570-1070 BC) non-coin form of silver shaped like rings and gold pieces shaped like sheep centuries were exchanged before the minting coins out different metals. (ref) Herodotus and later Polyaenus claimed “that the satrap started minting his own silver coinage, calling it aryandic in opposition to the golden, already existing, daric, thus irritating the Persian king.” (ref, Herodotus, Histories IV, 166 )

18th Dynasty Thutmose III (or Ay) as relative of 25th Dynasty Piye & Shabaka. (1479-1425 BC = 747-705 BC)
A Shabaka inscription in the Temple of Ptah @ Karnak built by Thutmose III suggest Piye & Shabaka somehow closely related to Thutmose & Hatshepsut or Ay?. Piye was Kushite and Hatshepsut ‘conquered’ Nubia and had her monuments defaced by later Egyptians (likely because she was a foreign Ethiopian wife of Thutmose that somehow gained the kingdom for Nubia instead of a native of Karnak who simply ruled Nubia!). Both Shabaka & Hatshepsut were prolific builders. (of course everyone in this age is. I’m pretty sure either these rulers overlap with either the Kushite/Nubian rulers of the 25th dynasty or the Egyptians that retake Egypt from them in the 26th! The same parallel of builders happens between 18th and 25th dynasties in The Temple of Amun at Jabel Barkal in Sudan.

Note that both the the 18th AND 25th dynasties are closely related to Kush/Nubia. The 25th are said to be Kushite rulers who controlled Middle Egypt, whereas the 18th are said to be Middle Kingdom rulars who controlled Kush/Sudan. Ether way, Assyria is closely involved with both (shown by the Amarna letters for the 25th).

There may even be a relationship between the names of monotheistic Amarna (Akanaten’s new capitol name for the Beni Amran tribe), Solomon’s close alliance with Sheba and Armenia with its relationship to Israel.

Ramesses Dynasty as Ptolemies (1292–1051 BC = 332-80 BC)
-From Ramesses I to Ramesses XI was 241 years vs. Ptolemy I to Ptolemy XI was 252 years! What are the chances?! thats huge, because it shows the historical dates are mixed up, but fairly accurate overall!!!
-The temple walls at Medinet Habu suggest the ‘sea peoples’ were composed (at least in part) of the Minoans from Crete. ‘Coincidentally’, again Ptolemy (especially Ptolemy V) engaged in long wars with Crete (see Cretan Wars). So the Minoans who radiocarbon date from 2000-1100 BC, are actually just radiocarbon/Egyptian dated Macedonian Cretans. The Hyksos of Avaris have a lot of Minoan artifacts too. (could Averis be by/where the real Pi-Ramesses is? (if its not alexandria and was really on the east delta)

Twenty-First Dynasty (1077-1051) Likely Pre-Roman Ptolemies? (80 – 44 BC?)
-Note that Ptolemy I’s, Ptolemy III and Ptolemy X are married to Berenice I,II & III ; AND Setnakhte, Ramesses III and Ramesses X are married to Tiy, Tiye and Tyti. This is no coincidence. Note these wives might unravel the duplicity in Seti II&II as Seti II was also married to Tiye (also spelled Tiy or Tiaa). So Seti II maybe the same person as Senakhte or a family member?. Note there seems to be three titles used among Ptolemy consorts, Bernice, Arsinoe and Cleopatra. Likewise there seems to be three names in 18/19 dynasty consorts Tiye, Nefertari, Meritamon. Use these to unravel people.
-This really needs to be looked at, most importantly to see if there are actually radiocarbon dates on the latest Ramesses or figures like Neferkare/Amenemnisu to see if radiocarbon years are still off by 1000 years at this point, or if they equilize part way through the Ptolemaic period but Egyptologist discard the dates that suddenly get younger.

Other Notes on Repeating History

-Temple of Hibis is one of the only existing temples known to be built by Darius I. (my bet is all others were redone by Ramesses/Ptolemy). “The temple bears a close resemblance – both architecturally and regarding inscribed texts – to Theban temples of the New Kingdom and also of the Ptolemaic period” (which means perhaps you can use its architecture to compare things built by Ahmose who might be the vassal pharaoh of Darius? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Hibis
-another good way to Link Darius to a Pharaoh is his known work on the Darius Canal. Aristotle and Strabo say Sesostris is the first to try building the canal (just before Darius), which Egyptologist correlate with  12th Dynasty, Pharaoh Senusret III (1878–1839 BC). Which may be based on nothing… But many articles say the Suez canal was worked on during the new kingdom. (so Amhose I? is Darius?) see here and here. Thutmose II had a residence out there, so that more evidence.

-Rameses Horus name means “The strong bull who rejuvenates the royalty”. The Apis Bull was the Egyptian equivilent of Savior (Just like Ptolemy Soter/Savior). Ptolemy created the new God Ser-apis (Zues-Apis Bull). built his great Serapeum in Alexandria, nearby the famous library, to elevate his new god as a deity (see here & here). Since at least Cambyses the bull was ritually killed (like Spanish bull fighters), embalmed and then resurrected. “Coincidentally”, a Serapeum in Saqqara was built by Ramesses II to embalm bulls just like the Sarapeum in Alexandria built by Ptolemy. Ptolemy II (of course) then “extended” and adds to it as well (actually the same builder!).

-Mithras Scene. This tradition of killing, interring/mummifying and resurrecting the zues-apis bull serves as the backdrop for the Christ narrative. It is almost certainly what is represented in Mithraic tauroctony and was practiced not just in Egypt but also Turkey and Italy. Many Serapeum‘s or Bull Tombs are found in Egypt, Turkey & Italy.

-Note that many temples such as the Temple of Khonsu, are “originally constructed” by Ramesses I,II, or III but then have sections thought to be “added” by Ptolemy I,II, or III. Why? Because they are the same people, but archaeologists have aspects attributed to one or the other (such as Greek writing vs radiocarbon dates or c14 dated paraphernalia that contradict, forcing them to hypothesize a ‘dual’ construction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Khonsu (other examples?)

-also Temple of Edfu. “started during the reign of Ptolemy III Euergetes and completed in 57 BC under Ptolemy XII Auletes. It was built on the site of an earlier, smaller temple also dedicated to Horus… [built under] the New Kingdom rulers Ramesses I, Seti I and Ramesses II” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Edfu

-same thing happens with Dendera Temple complex. Egyptologists know from inscriptions that the temple was built by Nectanebo II around (360–343 BC), but radiocarbon and other associated evidence leads them to believe it was built ontop of a temple by Pepi I and/or an Eighteenth dynasty ruler from (1550 – 1292 BC). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendera_Temple_complex

-In the Esna temple, An out of place “Jam of a Gateway” from the reign of Thutmose II (Eighteenth Dynasty) his strangely placed as a door sill in the Esna temple known to be the work of Ptolemy III Euergetes (known as a “restorer of Egypt” because so many things are re-used in his building projects”. Or is it that…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esna

-Why is it that pieces of King Ramses II statue were found in the Ptolmaic temple of Kom Ombo? https://www.newsweek.com/ancient-egypt-king-ramses-statue-829679
Note how the Ptolemaic temple of Kom Ombo has the same motifs and honors the same gods as a “previous” temple built by the Ramesses in the New Kingom. “A temple was already built in the New Kingdom to honor these gods” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Kom_Ombo

-Cuneiform inscriptions from Hattusa, Turkey mention Mithra and that Hittite king Suppiluliuma (reigned between 1344 to 1322 BCE) who achieved fame as a great warrior and statesman, ordered the recording of a peace treaty between himself and the Armenian king Šattivaz (reigned ca. 1350-1320 BCE). Mithra isn’t found again until the fourth century BC under Achaemenid king Xerxes (son of Darius) and Armenian king Tiridates.

-Medinet Habu and The temple of Anum inscribed as built by Hatshepsut and Thutmose III but then “modified” in the Greco-Roman period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medinet_Habu (Yet its artwork still has paint! one of the best preserved temples in Egypt)

-Temple of Amun at Medinet Habu (which is Ramesses III funerary complex has a ‘Gate of the Ptolemies’ built by …

-Tuna el-Gebel, like pretty much all ptolmaic temple complexes has 18-20th/New Kingdom foundations and temples sprinkled throughout (where they have c14 dates or writing that correlates it to ‘Older’ Dynasties. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuna_el-Gebel#History

-Records of Ramesses III talk about a crop failure that might be a volcanic eruption. An ash layer is found in peat deposits that radiocarbon dates to 1087-1006 BC.

-Ramesses III killed (or close to) in ‘harem conspiracy’ led by his second wife Tiye, ct scans shows wounds from multiple attackers which seem fatal but debate exists. Ptolemy II’s wife is exiled for plotting his murder. Records say she failed, but perhaps that was a lie to hide the murder from the people. Ptolemy III takes throne and pays his mom a stipend in her exile in coptus. Its unknown what punishments’ Tiye received.

-Ramesses III – X are not in any king lists. Sources include: The hieratic Harris Papyrus,

  • The Temple of Amun at KarnACK: The temple complex was built by the pharaohs of the New Kingdom, including Amenhotep I, Tuthmosis III, and Ramses II. But then Ptolemy III Euergetes and Ptolemy IV Philopator “added” a number of structures to the temple complex, such as a pylon, a temple of Isis and a birth house.
  • The Temple of Horus at Edfu: built by Ptolemy III Euergetes and Ptolemy IV Philopator added a number of structures to the temple, such as a pylon, and a birth house
  • The Temple of Khonsu at Luxor: built by Tuthmosis III, Amenhotep III and Ramses II but Ptolemy III Euergetes and Ptolemy IV Philopator added a number of structures to the temple complex, such as a pylon, and a birth house
  • The Temple of Isis at Philae: built by Nectanebo I, and Ptolemy II Philadelphus and Ptolemy IV Philopator added structures to the temple complex.
  • The Temple of Amun at Thebes: built by pharaohs such as Amenhotep I, Tuthmosis III, and Ramses II
  • The Temple of Montu at Medamud: built by Ramses II (perhaps on an Old Kingdom Sanctuary), but with structures from the Ptolemy VIII period.
  • The Temple of Seti I at Abydos: built by Seti I, yet Ptolemy IV Philopator added a number of structures to the temple complex, such as a pylon and a birth house.
  • The Temple of Sobek at Crocodilopolis: built by Ramses II but Ptolemy III Euergetes and Ptolemy IV Philopator added a number of structures to the temple complex, such as a pylon and a birth house.
  • The Temple of Ptah at Memphis: built by Ramses II complete with a 36 foot high statue of himself, but Ptolemy IV Philopator added a number of structures to the temple complex, such as a pylon and a birth house.
  • The Temple of Ptah at Luxor/Karnak contains mixed motifs from Thutmose III & Shabaka (1479-1412 = 705-690 BC) as well as Ramesside & Ptolmaic pharoes (1200’s = 200’s BC). Built by Thutmose III, but Ptolmaic ‘additions include’ in first gateway crosses an enclosed cartouche of Ptolemy VI. On the interior façade of the first gateway are passages of Ptolemy XI and Ptolemy XIII. The second and fourth gateways contain cartouches in the name of Shabaka. The third gateway cartouche is in the name of Ptolemy XIII. The fifth gateway leading to the portico columns of Ptolemy III contains the title of Tuthmosis III and on the gate contains the name of Ptolemy III.
  • The Temple of Amun at Jebel Barkal, Sudan was also built by 18th AND 25th dynasty rulers. In the 18th, at least Thutmose III, Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten), Tutankhamun and Horemheb as well as worked on by Seti I & possibly Ramesses II. This seems to suggest that ALL these pharaoh’s were associated with Nubia. The site was then ‘neglected’ until the reign of Nubian King Piye who added extensively to it. (forerunner to Shabaka) Once again this seems to show a synchronism or parallel between the 18th AND 25th dynasties. Close study of these will likely show them to be repeats of the same dynasty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Amun,_Jebel_Barkal



Important Events of Judah & Israel in Relation to Egypt & Mesopotamia
-Saul/David/Solomon appear to gain first independence from Canaanites & Amalekites
-in ~920 BC, Jeroboam flees to Egypt, allies with them and comes back to conquer Judah making Israel a vassal of Egypt (date)
– 700-900 BC, are somewhat of an Egyptian dark age. Probably when the Armarna letters occur!
-in 701 BCE, Hezekiah of Judah, Lule king of Sidon, Sidka, king of Ascalon and the king of Ekron formed an alliance with Egypt against Assyria (with Pharoah ___?), nevertheless, Sennacherib conquers the Northern Kingdom and parts of Judah (701 BC?), but stops short of Jerusalem & Egypt.
– in 671 Assyrian Esarhaddon sacks Memphis, conquers Egypt, takes massive spoils and captives to Assyria, appoints new rulers at every level including Necho I as king at Sais (673-663 BC)
– in 667 BC Ashurbanipal, quells revolts, reasserts Assyrian rule in Egypt
– in 655 BC Psamtik I threw off his ties to the Assyrians and allies with Greece.
– by 635 BC Egypt recaptures Ashdod.
– in 650-600, Egyptians were actively aiding the Assyrians in an attempt to help them survive from growing power of Babylon.
– in 609 BC, Jehoahaz, became king, the king of Egypt, Necho I (put into power by the Assyrians), rushed into Judah and deposed him, and Judah again became a tribute state of Egypt
– in 605 Babylon defeats Egypt at Carchemish and then Ashkelon.. (Jer 46:2). Jer & Ezek prophesied that Babylon would destroy Egypt (Ezek 29-32). But historians believe NO Babylonian army took Egypt, and Egypt stayed independent from the Assyrian conquest to the Persian Conquest.
– from 589-570 BC Apries or Biblical Pharaoh Hophra of Jer 44:30, 43:8-13, Ezekiel 17:15, is the one Hezekiah tries to ally with against Babylon. This suggests Israel was formerly independent of Egypt. Likely since the Assyrian fall of Egypt.

Actual DateHistorically Known Empire or CultureArchaeologically Dated EquivalentArcheol. Date
911-609 BCNeo Assyrian EmpireOld Assyrian Empire2600-2154 BC
605-556 BCNeo Babylonian EmpireOld Babylonian Empire1894-1595 BC
460-332 BCLate Achaemenes occupation of EgyptAhmose gains Egyptian semi-independence. Takes Memphis & battles averis.1550–1320 BC
332-30 BCPtolemaic Kingdom of EgyptRamessid 19th Dynasty of Egypt1292-1189 BC

Note 1: Egyptian artifacts first show up in Mesopotamia in Nimrud, which becomes a major Assyrian capital in 1350 BC. This date

Table of Pharaohs mentioned in the Kolbrin and possible correlations.

Actual DateKolbrin NameEquiv?Hist. DateDetails
~2400HanokNoahGLN:4:29 Hanok and the Ark/great ship. Had three brothers who divided the land.
BeltsheraBabel?GLN 3:7-9 The floodgates [of Atuma] were opened… “the people left… Shinara..fled up a mountain… built a gateway to heaven”
1450 BCAnked(Moses)MAN 6:1-48 Story of Moses & the Destroyer. “Kair taught these things to the Children of Light.. before the death of the Pharaoh Anked”. Mentions places: Remwar, Noshari, Maha, Pikaroth, Mara. City/God called “Thom”
970 BCAthmosAhmose1550 BCSOF 6:9 HUGE. This verse suggests that the Hyksos were Davidic Israel! David warred with Egypt at the same time Ahmose chased the Shepherd kings out.
910?TathomasisThutmose I or IV?1490 BCIf this is true… then Akhenaten is NOT Darius, but likely a follower of Babylon or Israel‘s cult.
772?NabihatonAkhenaten1352 BCMAN 34:29 Starts the story of how he had a demon and corrupted Egypt. Mother is Towi (Tiye) Name composed of Fathers ‘Nab’ adn ‘henaten’.
720 BCNafohiaunknown??SOF 1:1 “Father of sons of light (Hoskiah) came out of Egypt in days of Pharaoh Nafohia. (Should be about the time of the Assyrian conquest or Sargon of Akkad?)

Table of Pharaohs mentioned in the Bible and possible correlations.

Actual DateBible NameEquiv?Hist. DateDetails
?
?Rameses?unknown!1546 BCGen 47:11, Ex 1:11, Ex 12:37, Num 33:3–5 A pharaoh named Rameses is never mentioned in the Bible, but Joseph settles Jacob & his family “in the land of Rameses” and Israel “built Pithom & Rameses and on (named as Heliopolis east of Cairo in Spt.) as store cities for Pharaoh before fleeing to Succoth just before the Exodus. Rameses in the bible is thus just a region/city in Egypt meaning “Ra created it”. (see biblehub).
?Pharaoh??1 Kings 11:18–23. Hadad flees to Egypt from Paran, Pharaoh gives him wife Tahpenes’ sister to wife. They have son Genubath who’s raised in Pharaoh’s household.
?Pharaoh??1 Kings 3:1, 9:16 Gives Solomon his daughter and city of captured Gezer in Alliance. Thutmose III (1479–1425 BC) has inscription of conquering Gezer. Armana period leaders swear allegiance to Egypt. Siamun & Psusennes II common matches.
?Shishak??943-922 1 Kings 11:40 & 2 Chronicles 12:2 Tell of his Jeroboam’s escape to Egypt and return with Shishak to take Jerusalem.
?So’unknown730 BC2 Kings 17:4 says that king Hoshea sent letters to “So, King of Egypt”.  commonly identified with Osorkon IV (730–715 BC)
?Tirhakahunknown715 – 6862 Kings 19:9 & Isaiah 37:9. King of Ethiopia (Kush), waged war against Sennacherib in reign of King Hezekiah.. Some scholars have identified him as the pharaoh Taharqa (Ethiopia ruled Egypt from this point to Necho/Babylon, much like the late 18th dynasty)
sameNecho Necho II610–5952 Chron 35:20, 36:4, 35:22. Necho puts his brother Jehoiakim on throne of Judah (609 BC). Necho battles kills Josiah in Carchemish (605 BC). Takes King Jehoahaz captive in another Carchemish battle? Read and put dates.
sameHophraApries589-570Jer 44:30. I will give Pharaoh Hophra king of Egypt into the hand of his enemies and into the hand of those who seek his life, as I gave Zedekiah king of Judah into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar. Also mentions Pathros (upper), Noph (lower) & Tehpanhes border Egypt (43:7)

LIST OF OTHER CORRELATIONS.
-One of the most important things in the Kolbrin is CRT 7:5 which explains that the Mayan/Aztec Calendar is the correct cycle for the destroyer, NOT the later Israelite 49 year cycle. “Habaris… taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the year and divided the year into a … a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of The Destroyer”


Egyptian King Lists

HERODOTUS- The king list given us by Herodotus is all over the place but helps us to understand how likely it is that those of Manetho are completely erroneous is too. Since Herodotus lived 484-425 BC just after Darius we can likely trust the 26th dynasty names he lists. One big question is… where does the 18th dynasty fit in? It is the last true names in Menetho & Abydos/Saqqara King Lists made by Ptolemy III so I think it makes sense that these were all ruler between Darius & Ptolemy.

ChapTransPharaohMenethoM. DynSM. DATE
2.99.2MinaNarmerMenes1st dynasty62/ 3150 BC
2.100.2NitokrisNetjerikaraNitokris6th dynasty12/ 2182–2179 BC
2.101.1MoeriusAmenemhat IIIAmmenemes11? dyn16
2.102.1SesostrisSenusret IIISesostris12th dynasty48/ 1878–1860 BC
2.111.1Pheron?
2.112.1Proteus?
2.121.1RhampsinitosRamesses IIInot present
2.124KheopsKhufuSouphis?4th dynasty63/ 2589–2566 BC
2.127KhephrenKhafraSouphis?4th dynasty66/ 2558–2532 BC
2.129MycerinusMenkauraMenkheres4rth dynasty63/ 2532–2503 BC
2.136.1Asukhis?
2.137Anusis?
2.137Sabakon/NeferkareShabakaSeberkheres? Sabakon? 4rth? 25th?8/ 705–690 BC
2.140.2AmurtaiouAmyrtaeusAmurtaios28th dynasty6/ 404–398 BC
2.141.1SethosShebitko? Seti?Sebikhos? Sethos?25th? 19th?55/ 714–705 BC
2.151.2PsammetikhosPsamtik IPsammetikhos26th dynasty54/ 664–610 BC
2.152.1NeconNecho INekhao26th dynasty8/ 672–664 BC
2.158.1NecosNecho IINekhao II26th dynasty6/ 610–595 BC
2.159.3PsammiPsamtik IIPsammouthis?26th dynasty6/595–589 BC
2.161ApriesApriesOuaphris26th dynasty25/ 589–570 BC
2.172AmasisAmasisAmosis26th dynasty44/ 570–526 BC
3.14-15PsammetichusPsamtik IIIPsammekherites?26th dynasty6m 526–525 BC
MesutreCambyses IISon of Cyrus the Great27th dynasty6/ 525-522 BC
SetetureDarius Ithen Xerxes, artexerxes, Darius II27th dynasty36/ 522-486 BC

TABLE NOTES

Does the fact that Herodotus has ZERO New Kingdom (18th dynasty) Pharoah’s suggest that most the 18th came AFTER cyrus? Or is it because they are all right after David and are too OLD for accurate records?
-Amasis II might be a good match with Thutmose III based on both their conquests of Cyprus, power and military prowess. Thutmose II lead at least 17 campaigns from Syria to Nubia.


-Josephus last Pharoah reference is Sethos of whome he says, after Amenophis came… “Sethosis, and Ramesses, two brethren: the former of whom had a naval force; and in an hostile manner destroyed those that met him upon the sea. But as he slew Ramesses in no long time afterward, so he appointed another of his brethren [named Armais] to be his deputy over Egypt.” then… “For Manetho says, that Sethosis was himself called Egyptus: as was his brother Armais called Danaus” He sums the whole history as those who “inhabited this country, three hundred ninety and three years before Danaus came to Argos” (read it here).
Danaus is a famous legend, but like Herodotus, it seems very likely referring to Darius? My logic is this… Look at Armesis and Kherres in Eusibius. Josephus prolog suggests all the last pharoahs are contemporary with him. Is it coincidence that the last 2 pharaohs in Herodotus are named Amasis/Amosis and Apries? Probably not!

Footnotes In Paper

x. [[Sources of the Ptolmaic Dynasty include: 1. The “Canon of Kings” is an ancient Egyptian list of pharaohs that includes the Ptolemaic dynasty. It is inscribed on the walls of the temple of Seti I at Abydos, and is one of the oldest surviving king lists from ancient Egypt.
2. The “Alexandria List” is another ancient Egyptian king list that includes the Ptolemaic pharaohs. It was discovered in the Serapeum of Alexandria, a temple dedicated to the god Serapis.
3. The “Turin Canon” is an ancient Egyptian papyrus that contains a list of pharaohs, including the Ptolemaic dynasty. It was discovered in the 1820s in Turin, Italy and is now housed in the Museo Egizio in Turin.
4. The “Chronicle of the Pharaohs” by the Egyptian priest Manetho, written during the Ptolemaic period provides a list of the pharaohs of Egypt from the earliest times to his own day, including the Ptolemaic pharaohs.
5. The “Roman historian” Appian of Alexandria, wrote about the history of the Roman Republic and Roman Empire, including the Ptolemaic dynasty.
6. Plutarch, a Greek historian, biographer, and essayist wrote about Ptolemy I Soter and Ptolemy II Philadelphus in his biography “Life of Alexander” and “Life of Demetrius”]]

y. [[Egyptian temples which share

z. [[Sources that detail Ramesside period Pharaohs after Ramesses III are limited to: 1. Primarily archaeological information from the Tombs in the Valley of the Kings.
2. A little from a relief in the Temple of Ramesses III in Medinet Habu.
3. Papyri and ostraca discovered in various locations in Egypt, including Deir el-Medina

References

The history of Manetho as preserved by Eusebius, and Jerome (Armenian version). Or perhaps better, by Dynasty (book I, book II)

The History of Manetho as preserved by Josephus in ‘Against Apion‘ https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/apion-1.html#S14

The Histories by herodotus. (1890, Macaulay translation. 2013 Rawlinson Translation. Egyptian section spans from [99-172] )

Strabo’s Geography has some important information on Egypt.

attalus.org/egypt/ Has a great catalogue of translated ancient egyptian texts from 800 BC – 50 BC (chronological order)

mjn.host.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/ and even better one of all dates earlier than 800 BC. Pdf’s most with hieroglyphic transcriptions.

Pharoe.se, best resource on king lists and cartouches. https://pharaoh.se/comparing-the-kinglists (be sure to check out its library & bibliography)

Digital Egypt. This whole site could be turned into a map like my North America Archaeology one. I probably should. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt//chronology/index.html

phouka.com resources on king lists, dynasties and tombs. http://www.phouka.com/tr/egypt/history/KLManetho.html

Overview and back-check check of Willard Libby’s initial paper “on the age of things”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324749521_Radiocarbon_Dating_and_Intercomparison_of_Some_Early_Historical_Radiocarbon_Samples

Huge amount of information on dates and cultures. Egypt and the Mediterranean. Radiocarbon Dating and Egyptian Chronology

Histomap of the world. An old empire harmony chart. http://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/histomap-big.jpg

Babylonian Chronicles. Babylonian Chronicles – Wikipedia

Egyptian texts: St Andrews Corpus, attalus,

Huge number of artifacts used as original sources: List of inscriptions in biblical archaeology – Wikipedia

Faulty radiocarbon dates in Pompeii. Lindroos, Alf & Heinemeier, J. et al (2011). Problems in radiocarbon dating of Roman pozzolana mortars. Building Roma Aeterna. Current Research On Roman Mortar and Concrete. 214-230.

Radiocarbon dating in ‘The Manchester Museum Mummy Project‘, illustrated how different materials can produce large discrepancies in radiocarbon results, illustrating the importance of consistency and proper methods in gathering radiocarbon samples. (cloth vs bone on Egyptian mummies resulted in 1000 year + different results. A re-wrapping is assumed.)

Family Tree of the Ramessean 19th Dynasty

Family Tree of the Ptolemaic Dynasty

Radiocarbon Dating:
20 instances of false rings since 1932: https://www.science.org/content/article/false-tree-rings-could-provide-new-record-long-ago-hurricanes Actual article here: https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/898756 (Extrapolating that data suggests a two thousand year old tree could have as many as 400 in a 2000 year old tree.)

Libby presentation summarizing first publications: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/libby-lecture.pdf
Initial Libby paper (first page): https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.110.2869.678

Re-dating some of Libby initial samples: https://www.academia.edu/42582894/RADIOCARBON_DATING_AND_INTERCOMPARISON_OF_SOME_EARLY_HISTORICAL_RADIOCARBON_SAMPLES

Some new radiocarbon dates on major Egyptian periods. https://www.science.org/content/article/new-dates-egypts-pharaohs

186 radiocarbon dates from 1st dynasty Egypt. An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modelling. Dee, Michael, Shortland, Andrew, Et al. Royal Society Publishing, Nov 2013 [put these in teh libby table next to pre-c14 dates to show how off they are!]

Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt, Ramsay et al. Probably the most complete paper of assorted dates.
Read the paper here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44683433_Radiocarbon-Based_Chronology_for_Dynastic_Egypt#fullTextFileContent
Supplemental Material Here: https://www.science.org/doi/suppl/10.1126/science.1189395/suppl_file/bronk_ramsey.som.revision.1.pdf

Pre-carbon dating chronologies: https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.9701/page/n39/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/ancientchronolo00toffgoog/page/n240/mode/2up

Mediterranean radiocarbon off from northern Europe: https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.9701/page/n39/mode/2up

Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory. (Intcal adjustments for meditranian dates, especially because of santorini issues) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1096 webmap: https://arcg.is/1qvyLb0

Global radiocarbon database: https://www.p3k14c.org/download/ webmap: https://arcg.is/1HO8HK


How Old is the Earth? How the Bible Timeline Fits with Earth’s Geologic & Archaeological Prehistory.

.

Content Here:
-The vast majority of evidence points toward an earth MUCH older than 7,000/14,000 years.
-A Deeply symbolic biblical timeline which reduces the unknowably long & true timeframes into a simplified short symbolic system of sevens is just as faith-promoting and even more likely than a literal interpretations. (after all we know the seven days of creation are symbolic, also the exactly ten antediluvian & postdiluvian patriarchs seem symbolic.
-Even creationist believe in the very evolution they bash (only ‘phylum’ or kinds on ark)
-Even creationist believe in the very hyperbole they bash (seven creation days = 7000, Cain curse, etc)
-Geologic/Historic contradictions in the typical creationist arguments (esp. The Universal Model)
-Required aspects of a workable young earth model. (My 7000 – 70,0000 – 7 million year models)

.

Introduction

I believe the Hebrew Old Testament was created as a response to ancient-academic histories. Just as Pharaoh Ptolemy commissioned Manetho to write Aegyptiaca, the History of Egypt in the 3rd century BC, modern scholarship seems to point toward Ezra as they key figure in assembling a sizable team of Israel’s best post-exilic scholar-priests to write the history of the world through the Jewish lens from the libraries and best resources they had in 491 BC. (Before both Herodotus’ Histories & Menetho’s Aegyptiaca, & drawing heavily from histories compiled by priest/scholars of kings Josiah & Hezekiah.)

From my experience reading fascinating channeled texts such as those written by mystics like John Ballou Newbrough (1828–1891) or John S.M. Ward (1885 – 1949), I suspect Ezra also employed skilled prophetic mystics who claimed the ability to channel/reveal large sections of impressive historic works through a type of revelation which allowed them to see history in a condensed visionary and symbolic/meaningful way. (read their impressive works here)

These scholar/mystics either foreran or followed ancient scholars like Plato, Ptolemy & Hipparchus in computing the ‘great year‘ or prophetic/symbolic version of the procession of the equinoxes. This ‘Platonic Year’ as it came to be known was a system of mystical knowledge based on the actual astronomical calculations for the length of the cycle it takes for the stars to precess and then return into their original locations. A process that relates to being able to prophecy or predict lunar & solar eclipses, as well as the metonic cycle (upon which the Jewish calendar is largely based) and which involves the mystical numbers of 7, 70, & 490 from jewish prophetic texts. (70×360°=25,500 & 490×52=25,500)

However, even though I sympathize with those who see the first chapters of Genesis as a literal accounts of the earth’s 7000 year creation. I believe it makes far more intellectual and spiritual sense to see those chapters as an incredibly creative and sophisticated way of weaving the true sequence and key points of creation together with an inspired ancient prophetic timeline which seeks to condense and symbolize the earth’s long history into a shorter predictive system of sevens based on lunar-solar cycles as well as larger astronomical cycles.

Cycles within cycles within cycles. It seems like the Hebrew seer/prophets designed their timeline of history to be highly simbolic, with each cycle being a microcosm or symbol of yet larger and larger calendrical cycles. The thousand year lifespans and highly symbolic names of the antediluvian prophets especially seem to point toward each being symbolic of yet a larger early cycle of human and earth development which they saw in vision. (See Lev. 26:18–28, Ezekiel 1:15–21 & Moses 1:3,27,35 for examples)

The Profound Symbolism in the Bible’s Timeline

It’s significant to note that Genesis is separated into three main sections separated into sets of ten, pointing to its highly symbolic nature. These are; 1. Then ten demigods. 2. The ten Patriarchs 3. The history of the current cycle.

Let’s quickly go over the profound symbolism in these three sections of the bible. First in its timeline are the ten demigods. Most ancient histories of Ezra’s day started with the demigod’s of their culture with lifespans ranging from the hundreds to the tens of thousands. An account of many such ancient demigod genealogies can be read about in Diodorus and Eusibus Chronicle here. (Both the oldest Babylonian & Egyptian histories started with the demigods.)

For Ezra, he seems to have employed exactly ten demigods between creation and flood, followed by exactly ten patriarchs between the flood and Abraham (the father of his people). The ten antediluvian demigods are (1) Adam, Seth, (3) Enos, (4) Cainan, (5) Mahalaleel, (6) Jared, (7) Enoch, (8) Methuselah, (9) Lamech and (10) Noah. Undoubtedly the inclusion of exactly ten antediluvians with average ages between 700 & 1000 years is no accident. In fact the names themselves are symbolic as they are often translated to form the Hebrew sentence “Man is appointed mortal sorrow, (but) the Blessed God shall come down teaching. His death shall bring the despairing comfort and rest.” The number ten in this case seems to be symbolizing a complete age, and fulfilling multiple purposes in his chronology. By making each demigod have a lifespan approximating 1000 years he seems to symbolize an Egyptian concept of a full ‘age’ or cycle of heavenly time. Joseph Smith attempted to explain this in saying.

And I, Abraham, had the Urim and Thummim, which the Lord my God had given unto me, in Ur of the Chaldees; And I saw the stars, that they were very great, and that one of them was nearest unto the throne of God; and there were many great ones which were near unto it; And the Lord said unto me, by the Urim and Thummim, that Kolob was after the manner of the Lord, according to its times and seasons in the revolutions thereof; that one revolution was a day unto the Lord, after his manner of reckoning, it being one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest. This is the reckoning of the Lord’s time, according to the reckoning of Kolob. (Book of Abraham 3:1–4) As also “Kolob, signifying the first creation, nearest to the celestial, or the residence of God. First in government, the last pertaining to the measurement of time. The measurement according to celestial time, which celestial time signifies one day to a cubit. One day in Kolob is equal to a thousand years according to the measurement of this earth, which is called by the Egyptians Jah-oh-eh.” (facsimile 2, figure 1)

This theory that the individual names in the antediluvian bible chronology actually represent entire ages ranging from 1000-3000 years is laid out in the channeled apocryphal work, Oahspe. Here each cycle is called a ‘dan’ and is said to equate to roughly 2500-3500 years of earth’s orbit wherein it passes through a celestial zodiac and makes a complete “harvest of souls” before a time of cosmic destruction. (add reference & quote). Therefore according to Oahspe, the ten demigods roughly represent 10 past cycles of time which approximated 3000 years each, much like the Platonic Great Year of ~25,000.

The concept that the early bible chronology & genealogy represent something deeper than face value, such as entire ages of the past continues with the post-diluvial timeline which is again also composed of exactly ten names from the Flood to Abraham. These are (1) Shem, (2) Arphaxed, (3) Salah, (4) Eber, (5) Peleg, (6) Reu, (7) Serug, (8) Nahor, (9) Terah and (10) Abraham. This seems more than coincidence, and again the Book Oahspe gives a convincing channeled history suggesting that these TWO, ten named sequences represent TWO separate processionary periods of 25,000 years each (so 50,000 years total). An interesting number because we also find it in other impressive modern prophetic/channeled works such as ‘The Law of One’ Series. The works of Edgar Cayce, The Keys of Enoch, Bringers of the Dawn. We might ascribe this to coincidence were it not for the fact that the bible cuts it’s modern history since Moses into SEVEN 490 year periods of captivity and freedom (laid out in Leviticus x:xx) after the three patriarchs of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob (Israel). Once again seriously seeming to be pointing us to something greater….

By adding 2 such sequences of 10 (the demigod plus the patriarchs), Ezra may have meant to equate his symbolic timeline to 70,000 years. Seven thousand years short of the important cosmic processional number of 77,400 years. Or a period of 3 great years. Dualistically, Ezra may have used specific numbers slightly less than 1000 to encode crytpic cypers in a way that accorded with Egyptian or Babylonian records for Menes, called Aegyptus and the father of the Egyptian race (according with Hermes in Greek). Note that in Oahspe, the timeline of Abraham is used to dualistically symbolize an entire age of ~2500 years. [finish this….]

. SEE MY ARTICLE ON ISSUES WITH THE UNIVERSAL MODEL

.

.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION FROM THIS POINT

Matching with New Age literature of both Oahspe, Law of One and Occultist like Blavatsky
1-Mu/Lemuria, 75-50k BP. (matching with antediluvians). see LOO 10.15
2-Atlantis, 50-25k BP (matching with Noah to Abraham)
3-Current Cycle

Moses 1 is the key. It explains clearly that Moses’ revelation of the earth is only PARTIAL, and gives an account ONLY of this cycle of THIS earth. In verse 30 Moses essentially asks “why did you create the universe (heavens), earth, it continents (lands) and people?” And god makes it clear that he is not going to answer that question. He responds in verse 31, “For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me” (Moses 1:31)

Discontent with being denied an answer, Moses tries a more specific question, “Be merciful unto thy servant, O God, and tell me concerning this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, and also the heavens, and then thy servant will be content.”

The answer given to Moses question is confused in translation, as we have lost common usage of the idiom “the heavens and earth shall pass away”. The ancients understood well that the history of the earth was one of global destruction and re-creation.

38 And as one earth [or cycle] shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come; and there is no end to my works, neither to my words…

40 And now, Moses, my son, I will speak unto thee concerning this earth [or cycle] upon which thou standest; and thou shalt write the things which I shall speak.

This might very well be a key to unravelling our modern Bible, which we assume comes down from the pieces of the original revelations to Abraham and Moses. Here Moses is told that the revelation concerns ONLY the THIS present earth and not any of the earth’s or other planets after his present earth cycle.

Texts such as the Kolbrin (which contains interesting material supposedly pre-dating the Bible) suggests that the bible was NOT meant to be taken literally in it pre-Moses timespans. Revealed texts such as Oahspe, and Joseph Smith’s Book of Moses also make this clear, although the talking snake (Egyptian apep, god of the under world) and woman coming from man’s rib should be enough of a hint that the formative periods of the book are meant to be a deeply symbolic metaphor.

Howver, what many might not have considered is that Genesis is actually meant to accord or roughly correspond to the visions seen by Moses (according to LDS theology–see Moses ch. 2) or seen by the adepts of old (see Oahspe) concerning the formation of the earth. In fact for a modern example of this, see J.S.M. Ward’s vision of the formation of the earth here. This would explain why it begins with details of the formation of energy/light, the galaxy, the planets and the plants and animals. For a more detailed ancient view of those parts of the bible, see the opening books of the Kolbrin (Link).

In correlating the bible with Geology, I believe the important geophysical events such as the creation of earth, the creation of animals (and beginnings of them dying and making fossils) as well as The Flood and separation of the Continents at Peleg at least seem to be put in the correct order, but then superimposed upon the narrative of mankind so as to create a timeline which correlates natural science with scripture. (ie. Things start living and dying in both the Garden of Eden and Cambrian Explosion, then there’s a Great Dying at the Flood/Permian Extinction, then there’s a separation of the continents at Peleg/Pangea, and then a general march to the conditions of today.

As I know there are many Jews, Muslims and Creationists who visit this site, I offer the following Geologic/Scriptural correlation that is at least somewhat rational. (Which is more than I can say for the majority of creationist biblical correlations out there). Take it for what it’s worth even though it is only meant to represent what I believe the writers might have intended or perhaps even thought in the way they saw the earth’s progression through time.

AND NOTE. The ONLY rational placement of a Global Flood is with one of the two mega-extinction events such as the Great Permian Extinction superimposing geologic events over the human timeline. Any other placement comes up against insurmountable problems. Also the separation of the ‘land’ or continents at Peleg can match only with the separation of Pangea in the Permian. The following correlation would have to assume things like 1. Current Radiometric dates are off by millions of years. 2. Man existed in the early geologic record but left no trace in the fossil record. 3. Rates of erosion and deposition in the deep past occurred under uniformitarian principles, but at vastly higher rates because of the draining of creation and flood waters from the land over hundreds of years. 4. Oogenesis is driven by rapid pole shift, not convection cells.

Biblical Actualism– A Novel Young Earth Model

Radiometric dating correlation curve showing hypothetical correlations between actual dates (bottom x axis) and hypothesized, highly skewed radiocarbon dates (left y axis) and Ar/ar & Uranium series dates. If galactic conditions involving vastly different relativistic conditions (and neutrino flux?) caused vastly faster decay in the past, then those geologic dates would skew progressively younger the farther back you go. On the other hand, largely different solar conditions might cause radiocarbon dates to skew in a wholly different timeline.
My Brother’s chart showing a possible literal or symbolic correlation between true prehistory and the events of scripture. If symbolic, the adepts who authored the bible (chiefly the Egyptian Moses) may have attempted to create correlations to from events they saw in vision to those they saw in vision (including a “separation of the earth” during Peleg matching Pangea’s separation, a global flood matching the End Permian extinction, etc…
see Lambert Dolphin’s population calculations for if known numbers are even viable.

under construction:

Problems with literally trying to Match with Geologic Time

  1. TO DO:
    • Change the exponential decay illustration to show ice ages starting bigger w/ pole wobble and getting smaller and less tight with time (100k periodicity becomes 24k then 3k). Explain w/ text how there used to be no overlap between ice age and geologic history, now its pushed back to Oligocene, I believe should and will push back to Cretaceous.
    • Make a new 2 column correlation illustration where right side is the 70k view instead of 7k.
    • Put Greenland/geologic poleshift with mya, next to Mario Biltraps changing pole archaology illustration. (they should both be big 7 pointed heptagon where the pole jumps seven times in one 24k circle.
  2. Most who do this (Including myself when I did), do so because of a strong anti-evolution bias. Trying hard to disprove evolution because it is often associated with anti-religiousness and presented in a very anti-biblical way. But what they fail to see is that ANYONE WHO BELIEVS IN THE BIBLE, ALSO MUST BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION!  Its only a question of degrees. Because of its impossibility no-one believe every species was in the ark. So even among creationists the prevailing view is that only animal ‘kinds’ or singe representatives from entire taxonomic phylum were on the arc, which means all existing species and breads evolved from single representatives of the family of felines, canines bears, lizards, (finish). So ask the questions:
    • How much evolution has occurred? Were Comodo dragons, and EVERY type of lizard on the ark? Every feline? How many of the 250+ monkey species?! (~120 in Old & New World each.)
    • How did animals get across continents? Such as Monkeys, Elephants, deer, rabbits (if you believe the continents were one, THEN IT HAD TO BE THE PERMIAN (OR POSSIBLY K/T) EXTINCTION, (so everything you propose is wrong.) Putting the Flood in a recent time AFTER the continents have fully separated DOES NOT WORK. You just couldn’t get all the animals spread to all the islands from Australia to New Zealand to Indonesia & South America.
    • How do you explain New Zealand flightless birds? Or Australia/Madagascar lemurs & more? They only make sense with adaptive evolution given the predators of those islands. (Lemuria is a great explanation.)
    • MONKEYS are a HUGE problem for evolutionists (but also non-permian extinction creationists). How did they get across the oceans! They just DONT migrate through cold regions! [They MUST have migrated in the Triassic/Cret before continents split much and temps were worm, but NO FOSSIL evidence! So Humans could have lived too!) We see same issue with cocalants not being found from 50mya to now)
  3. Most creationist ALSO BELIEVE IN CREATION SYMBOLISM! Where the ‘sun moon and stars all created on the FOURTH DAY? The day AFTER grass, trees and plants were created? Or even the fourth thousand years of creation (for those who favor the day of the Lord = 1000 years creation theory). NO, most creationist hold that this is symbolic
  4. WHERE DO YOU PLACE THE FLOOD. Most creationist are so sloppy on this that its hard for any actual stratigraphic expert to take their arguments seriously. They often point to the layers of the Grand Canyon as being DEPOSITED in the flood, and then ALSO suggest that the canyon itself was then ERODED by the flood. This, unfortunately, is simply impossible because of the fact that subaerial ichnofossils, such as TERRESTRIAL FOOTPRINTS are found in the majority of the Canyons layers. THESE CAN’T BE DEPOSITED UNDERWATER. The canyon’s erosion also plays a huge problem, as each canyon is proportional to the MODERN flood potential of its stream. AND the folds upriver can ONLY be eroded concurrent with slow uplift on rivers that once again are proportional to current flood potentials! (flesh out)
  5. Paleozoic. People would have to had lived on a Precambrian bedrock craton, which we’d have to suggest has been subducted somewhere since there’s ZERO evidence of pre-Permian hominids. (Some have suggest Lemuria or Mu are under the Antartica ice cap, or sunk in the continental crust around New Zealand… Animals would have had to have spread from the proverbial “garden of Eden” of this lost continent and slowly have begun filling the earth and creating the illusion of fossil/faunal succession from their reproduction/dispersion rates. They would have had to be evolutionarily ancient (likely more ape or big-foot like, which is what law of one says, and had the capability of breathing a VERY different atmosphere). They would have been obliterated at the Permian Extinction. Coincidentally, the Bible and NewAge literature make these assumptions
  6. Mesozoic. Again, people would have lived on a Precambrian bedrock craton in a world and atmosphere of the dinosaurs. Here, their foods and plants would have just begun to proliferate but not made any meaningful inroads into the fossil record until the very end. All early hominids would need to be reassessed based on their geologic provenance, pushing the evolution of man back over 200 million years.
  7. Cenozoic. During Cenozoic times, flora and fauna quickly become modern. This would have to correlate with the period symbolized in the Bible by the Tower of Babel/Abraham where remnants of Giants and Nephalim still roam the earth and things quickly become modern.
  8. Were the continents one or weren’t they?  (if you take the scriptures literally it’s hard to escape that one). You MUST pick the Permian. 
  9. Who are Denisovans?  What about Neanderthals? 
  10. When was the ice age?   (it must work with Stonehenge, the pyramids, extinction of Mammoths and MULTIPLE glaciations

Matching with Ice Ages Somehow
1- Wisconsin, the last ice age ENDED with Abraham/Current cycle. (this is totally unworkable)
2- Illinoisan,
3- Pre Illinioan: late Mesozoic glacial periods

ANYONE WHO BELIEVS IN THE BIBLE —-  BELIEVES IN EVOLUTION.  Its only a question of degrees.
-you don’t believe every species was in the ark. Only ‘KINDS’ which means not hundreds of felines, canines bears, lizards,

TABEL OF AUTHORS ON CATASTROPHISM.

AuthorPrimary WorkMechanism of ShiftEvidence Cited (Ice & Geometry)
Charles HapgoodThe Earth’s Shifting Crust (1958)Crustal Slippage: The lithosphere slides over the core like the skin of an orange.Greenland/Hudson Bay Centering: Noted that the Wisconsin ice sheet was asymmetrical to the current pole; cited the lack of glaciation in Siberia as proof that Siberia was in a temperate zone.
Randall CarlsonCosmographic ResearchCometary Impact: Torque from massive bolide impacts or meltwater pulses.Ice Sheet Geometry: Focuses on the “scablands” and the massive hydraulic energy required to melt the Cordilleran/Laurentide sheets, suggesting a sudden latitudinal change.
Mark CarlottoBefore Egypt (2020)Rotational Instability: Alignment shifts related to ancient site orientations.Archeo-astronomy: Argues that the “North” of ancient civilizations (including the Pyramids and Teotihuacan) points to previous locations of the North Pole in Greenland or the Atlantic.
Hugh BrownCataclysms of the Earth (1967)Centrifugal Force: Accumulation of ice at the poles creates a “wobble” that eventually flips the planet.The “Wobbling” Ice Cap: Specifically argued that the mass of the ice cap centered over the Hudson Bay caused the 18,000-year-ago shift.
Peter WarlowThe Reversing Earth (1982)The Tippy-Top Model: Earth flips $180^{\circ}$ due to external gravitational torque.Climate Suddenness: Used the “frozen mammoths” of Siberia and the lack of ice there to argue for a near-instantaneous flip from temperate to arctic.
AuthorPrimary WorkBackgroundKey Arguments
Donald W. PattenThe Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch (1966)CreationistArgued the Ice Age was caused by a near-miss of the planet Mars, which dumped ice on the poles and caused a catastrophic shift in Earth’s spin axis.
Michael OardFrozen in Time (2004)CreationistFocuses heavily on the Siberian Mammoths. He argues the “lack of ice in Siberia” proves a unique post-flood climate that uniformitarian models cannot explain.
Barry SetterfieldThe Velocity of Light and the Age of the UniverseCreationistProposes that a decay in the speed of light (c) led to changes in atomic behavior, causing the Earth’s core to expand and the crust to shift/rift catastrophically.
Joseph C. DillowThe Waters Above (1981)CreationistFocuses on the Vapor Canopy theory. He uses the “frozen mammoths” as proof of a sudden collapse of this canopy, which he links to a rapid change in polar temperatures.
Immanuel VelikovskyEarth in Upheaval (1955)CatastrophistWhile not a Creationist, he is the “godfather” of the Arcuate Mountain Belt argument. He claimed mountains were “heaved up” in hours during axis shifts caused by planetary flybys.

.

.

.

.

.

.GET AARON TO WRITE A FICTIONAL STORY ON THIS.

-The most important part of this imaginative fictional story is the idea: what if religion and science actually tell the same story?
-Aliens have been on this earth planet seeding since the Cambrian explosion.
-They lived with highly sophisticated space ships, taking them on and off planet every since life began on earth.
-They coexisted with dinosaurs of the Mesozoic and giant trees and dragonflies of the Paleozoic.
-What story could we tell here? I’m picturing something like avatar or ewok adventures that really captures the best parts of the massive plants and animals of the past, but has humans coexisting with them.
-It needs to be marketed to creationists AND MUSLIMS! (which would require finding out what they believe of Adam and eve)
-It needs to really re-tell the story of Adam and Eve. And it needs to travel through time somehow.
-WHATS THE STORY? Maybe the idea I once had of the kid in North Korea who had no idea there was a bigger world around him, and then he goes to a space base, and the tables turn and now its the whole world that has no idea there’s a bigger world of interconnected off-planet people around them. Perhaps in the orientation you could introduce TIME-TRAVEL, which is under STRICT guard not to be used under the rules of non-intervention. But in this case THEY HAVE TO BE USED. Why would the time travel be needed?

-A big part of this movie needs to be like a near death experience. With the higher dimensional beings explaining to the hero how reality works. How gods are all connected ‘as ONE’, and how they occasionally intervene in earth’s affairs. But most importantly, how an aspect of ourselves is part of that ONENESS, and how our hero has been reincarnated over and over but now needs to go back in time to

The Aztec/Mayan Calendar (And its similarities to the Hebrew/Biblical Calendar & Book of Mormon dates)

Summary

  • Similarities between Mesoamerican and Near-eastern Calendars
  • How to read Mesoamerican/Mayan/Aztec Calendars (see my Maya date conversion program!)
  • Understanding the “K’atun Wheel/Round” (or u kahlay katunob) and how it tracks the 520 year cycles very much like Daniel’s 490/500 year ‘sacred weeks‘ calendar.
  • A list of long count dates & references.

Introduction

Mesoamerican calendars show an astonishing amount of similarity to the Hebrew/Biblical and ancient near eastern & Chinese calendars. Really, its hard to believe these calendar systems developed completely independent of each other without some type of diffusionary influence. Of particular significance is “K’atun Wheel/ Calendar Round” (or u kahlay katunob) and its similarity to the Hebrew lunisolar 70 week (490 year) sacred/prophetic calendar of Dan 9:24–27 used by the Jews to foretell the end of each age and coming of the Messiah.

In addition to the Mayan numeric system which is surprisingly similar to Egyptian numbering (the fraction zero being nearly identical), a creation date similar to the Jewish Calendar and animistic elements which are incredibly similar to Balinese and Chinese systems, the Mayan religious cycle or sacred round shows surprising similarity to the Jewish sacred round or religious cycle preserved in the Book of Daniel. For those unfamiliar with Daniel’s 70 week prophesy, it showcases the Jewish prophetic calendar or cycle of 490 years or 10 Jubilees, made by combining the Jewish Sabbatical cycle of 7 years with the Jewish Jubilee cycle of 49/50 years. In Daniel 9 a full ‘prophetic cycle’ is said to be 70 ‘weeks or sevens‘ equaling 490 years plus a short period (after which time ‘Messiah’ would come & the temple would be destroyed). This 490 year period is the conjunction of ten Jubilee periods (10×49=490) or 70 sabbatical cycles (7×70=490). This is often interpreted to actually be up to 530 years since many speculate that an intercalary ‘sabbatical year period’ was added to the end of each Jubilee–thus adding up to 45 ‘uncounted’ intercalary years to the 490 (490+45=535yrs. see example addition in Dan 12:11). One can’t help but notice the similarity of this Jewish ‘prophetic/religious calendar’ and the Tzolkin or sacred round of the Mayans. With the Maya, their ‘Jubilee’ was 52 years instead of 49, and was formed of 18 ‘weeks’ of 20 days instead of 7 sevens. However, like the Jubilees, ten of these 52 year sacred rounds, made a great year of 520 years (quite like the “K’atun Wheel”, “short count” or “u kahlay katunob” of the Maya). The similarity of these calendar cycles caused early chronologers like Fernando de Ixtlilxochitl to refer to the Mesoamerican systems with the same Biblical nomenclature.

Of course, this is just one of many similarities. Following is a list of many of the other similarities between the Mesoamerican calendars and the Near-eastern/Eurasian calendars of antiquity.

  • They both start from similar Anno Mundi epochs, base dates or ‘date for the creation of the world’. (Hebrew Calendar: 3761 BCE, Mayan: 3114-3374 BCE, Chinese: 2671 BC — why would they all pick the 3rd & 4rth millennium? Unless they were all basing their worldviews on the same creation/destruction cycles covered in the Kolbrin & Oahspe )
  • They both have a ‘long count’ and a ‘short count’. The long count tracks days/years from creation, and the short count is a ‘sacred’ calendar used to track days/years within a smaller religious/political cycle (the Haab & Tzolkin 520 yr cycle for Mayans; the Jubilee & Sabbatical 490 yr cycle for Jews. The 490/520 year cycle was important for prophesying events as shown by both the book of Daniel and Ixtlilxóchitl.)
  • They both have similar Jubilee years. Hebrew Calendar: every 49/50 years, Maya: 52 years. (1/10 the prophetic great years)
  • They both have similar Great Sabbatical Years (Maya 73 sacred years for tzolkin to match the haab. Hebrew Calendar: 70 years was the ‘weeks’ of daniel’s time to Messiah with 7+62+1, once again these cycles were important for tracking prophetic events)
  • 720/750 yrs seems to be a solar storm cycle seen in radiocarbon calibration curves and in climate studies (see Hallstatt Oscillation). Perhaps more obviously it is the known interval in the Saros cycle where an eclipse reoccurs in the same region.
  • They both have important 13 cycle periods (Hebrew Calendar skipped between 12 months on a regular year, and 13 months on ‘leap’ years.) Whereas the Mesoamericans used 13 cycles to track their sacred round. (in this case the Mayan Tzolkin is likely a macro type used to track the ‘Great Conjunction’ of Jupiter, Saturn & often 5 planets each 13×20 or 258 and 516 years. See understanding the Great Conjunction.)
  • They both used a ‘Year for a Day’ system, where the annual sacred calendar’s “days” were projected onto a parallel ~500 year period. The Mayans called theirs ‘u kahlay katunob‘ or ‘Katun Wheel’ which projected the Tzolkin’s 13 cycles of 20 days onto 13 periods of 20 years to track long period religious cycles of 260 years (or ‘doubled’ as 520 years). For the Hebrew Calendar this ‘Year for a day’ system is given in Daniel 9’s “70 week prophesy” which prophesies of a period totaling 490 years (70 sabbatical years or 10 Jubilee years). Both Ixtlilxochitl and Diego de Landa use this Mesoamerican calendar system and point out its similarities to the Jewish Jubilee cycle.
  • They both seem to have special regard for the number 144,000 (length of Baktun in days, also in Bible in Revelation 7:3–8, 14:1, 14:3–5). Could they both be related to the (older?) Hindu ‘Kalpa Cycle’ and the Suryasiddhanta measurement for the precession of the equinoxes?
  • There is a WILD correlation between the use of the tzolkin– and haäb-cycle 52 year round’s FOUR signs & directions (see this image! or last 30sec of this video) and the Chinese Sexagenary Cycle. Not only are they written identically with 2 characters pairs, but the ‘earthy branches‘ part of the cycle is divided into four animate glyphs matching with coordinate directions! The Babylonians & near-easterners did this with degrees/minutes/seconds in maps too. (I suspect that by studying the Chinese Sexagenary Cycle, someone will unravel the Mesoamerican Tzolk’in and how it tracks seasons with the direction, and tracks Venus like Israel & Egypt instead of Jupiter like China).
  • The Mesoamerican Tzolkin notation is almost exactly like the Chinese zodiac system. Particularly in the way a year in a great cycle is denoted by a number and Zodiac animal. The Chinese would say January 2012 as ‘the year of water (5) dragon’. The Mesoamericans would say Jan 2012 as the year of ‘2 Flint’.
  • They both have a significant ‘aligning’ of the Sabbatical and Jubilee years. See the way Daniel 9 uses 490 as ’70 weeks‘ or 10 Jubilees (70×255.5 and 49×365-d = 49 years). Compare that with the way Ixtlilxochitl uses 10 ’rounds’ or 52 year ‘Calendar Rounds’ (where lunar/ritual Tzolk’in cycle aligns with solar Haab cycle- 73×260-d Tzolkʼin days and 52×365-d Haab days = 52 years). So a epochal calendar round was 490 in bible (see Daniel 9), and 520 among Aztecs (see Ixtlilxochitl for an explanation of this).
  • The fact that the Book of Mormon says they changed their calendar system base date 510 years after leaving Jerusalem, and started counting anew from the ‘reign of the Judges’ is very significant. Since the ‘Katun Wheel’ as I explain below, only goes to 260/520 years; a people using a Mesoamerican Calendar (or Jewish of 490?) would be needing a new base date.
  • There are some strange similarities in the Aztec Calendar stone in its ‘weeks’. Note it has 52 boxes of 5’s around the center. This is speculated to be 52 ‘weeks’ of 5 days in a sacred round/tzolkin of 260 days which also happens to be a microcosm to the exactly 52 years of the sacred round aligning with the Long Count (exactly 53 years to align with the Haab). That’s a strange correlation to the 52 weeks of 7 days in a Western/Babylonian based calendars. Is this similarity coincidence, or is there another Tzolkin/Haab correlation with a strange mathematical relationship they used, between the Tzolkin 260 day round and Haab 365 day round that we don’t understand yet?
  • The Jewish Calendar uses the Metonic cycle to synchronize months with the year. The 19 year Metonic cycle is closely related to the 18.031 year Saros Cycle. (used to track lunar/solar eclipses) Of which there are 72 in 13 centuries. 3 Saros cycles of 18.031 years equals 1 Exeligmos of ~54.1 years. (and 20 Saros equals 360, which is an approximation of both the Macro ‘Year’ (365) and Saros 375/750 period where lunar eclipses re-occur in the same geographic area. So the Jewish calendar uses the Matonic cycle to sink with the moon, and the Mayan uses the Saros cycle to sink with the moon.
  • Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions, called the “Star of David” occur every 19.85 years (20 yrs). (Like the Saros cycle, significant great conjunctions occur every 6 minor ones or 119.16 years and total zodiac realignment takes 2,390 years). As mentioned above, the Tzolkin is likely a macro type used to track the ‘Great Conjunction’ of Jupiter, Saturn & often 5 planets each 13×20 or 258 and 516 years.

I suppose one could argue that all these similarities simply have to do with the similarities in the celestial cycles being tracked, but I think that’s a stretch. There’s little in nature that would make them choose such similar creation dates or ‘Jubilee/Venus’ correlations. Note that Mesoamerica has over 60 Calendar system variants, but nearly all of them use similar cycles to those mentioned above. I believe the Mayan calendar is a slightly changed adaptation of the early Jewish Calendar, where based 7’s were traded in for base 5/20’s, Matonic cycles traded for Saros Cycles (probably under Austronesian Empireal influence around the rise of the Mayan Kingdom 600-950 AD), and so that the Great conjunction’s 520 could be used instead of the 486yr Venus transit.

The Metonic Cycle: Among the Greeks & Hebrew’s their religious cycles were often based on the Saros & ‘Metonic Cycle‘. Although its unknown when the Metonic Cycle was discovered and incorporated into sacred calendars, attributes of the cycle were shared between many near east calendar systems including the ancient Babylonian and modern Hebrew Calendars. Somewhat like the Mayan Sacred Round, the Metonic Cycle syncs individual cycles of 18/19 solar years (or 235 synodic months/255 draconic months) after which the phases of the moon recur on the same day of the year, in the Jewish/Hebrew calendar, this 19 year cycle is used to tie together the lunar & solar calendars by keeping track of the 12 common (non-leap) years of 12 months and 7 uncommon (leap) years of 13 months. To automate this correlation, the Greeks even invented a mechanism very similar to the Mayan calendar round to sink their three calendars. Called the Antikythera Mechanism this device synced the solar, lunar and sacred calendars of the Mediterranean world during the Greek era BC. Note that the Hebrew, Metonic and Mesoamerican Tzolkin all tracked the lunar cycles in a similar ‘separate sacred or prophetic calendar’ (often related to Venus).

Interpreting a Mesoamerican/Mayan Calendar date is quite simple once you know how each unit correlates with Western Calendar units.

How to Read & Calculate Aztec/Mayan Dates

Its important to understand Mesoamerican dates can and were specified in multiple ways. One is by simply using the Long Count. With this system you simply count the number of days/years from the “creation date”, which is thought to be 3114 BC. (see ‘creation date’ discussion) This system gives the most accurate result but isn’t a traditional date. Its more like the modern ‘Julian day number‘ used by astronomers. The others are the traditional Short Count or sacred round cycle of the Tzolkin & Haab, year bearer and lastly the K’atun Wheel/Round or “u kahlay katunob” which we’ll get to in a minute. Here’s a breakdown of the different systems and how they correlate with Western systems we are used to.

  • Long Count = Similar to the Julian day number system used by astronomers. (anno mundi of ~3114 BC instead of 4714 BC)
  • Haab/Solar Round = Similar to the day/month part of our Western solar/annual calendar. (18 mo. of 20 days instead of 12 mo. of 28/31 days)
  • Tzolkin/Sacred Round = Similar to the ‘weeks’ of our Western/lunar calendar. (28 weeks of 13 days instead of 52 weeks of 7 days)
  • K’atun Round/Short count = Similar to the ‘year’ section of our Western calendar. Since the Haab doesn’t track years (only day-month), and the Long Count doesn’t match the true solar year, the K’atun round can track true years in a 260/520 year religiously significant cycle (after which it starts over).
  • Year Bearers = One of the most common date system used in old codices, it really doesn’t have a Western equivalent. It is much more like the Chinese zodiac system which labels each year after an animal. (ie. 2012, the year of the Dragon)

Long Count Dates: Just like the Julian day number system counts dates from 4714 BC, or the year date in a Gregorian system counts from the time of Christ, or a year on the Hebrew calendar counts from the creation year of 3761 Anno Mundi. A typical Long Count date has the following format: Baktun.Katun.Tun.Uinal.Kin, (14.20.20.18.20 or year×400.years×20.year×1.month.day). Note it reads from right to left (and top to bottom on monuments) instead of left to right, and uses a vigecimal/base-20 system instead of a base-10 like ours). Since it is believed that the ‘years’ of the Long Count were computed using 360 days instead of 365.25 days (without adding leap days) then the Long count’s days/months would have been completely off from the seasons and solar years. This is why the calendar’s use was limited. And converting to a Gregorian date takes some math. This is usually done by multiplying the whole number into days and then essentially dividing by 365.24 to get back into true years/months/days. However, note that computing the left 3 ‘year’ digits without any conversion usually gets you within 22-36 years of the true date. (Since most dates range from 500 BC to 1000 AD and missing 3.25days×in 2500-4000 years = only 22-36 years). Here’s the breakdown of the digits.

  • Kin = 1 Day.
  • Uinal (month) = 20 kin = 20 days. (or 4 weeks of 5 days)
  • Tun (year) = 18 uinal (months) = 360 days = ~1 year. (or 72 weeks of 5 days)
  • Katun (score) = 20 tun (years) = 360 uinal (months) = 7,200 days = ~20 years.
  • Baktun = 20 katun (scores) = 400 tun (years) = 7,200 uinal (months) = 144,000 days = 400 ‘long count‘ years.
  • Piktun = 13 Baktun = 5200 years or a full creation/destruction cycle.

The kintun, and katun are numbered from 0 to 19 (20 yrs); the uinal are numbered from 0 to 17 (18 mo); and the baktun are typically numbered from 0 to 13 (like the Tzolkin/sacred round). The Long Count has a cycle of 13 baktuns, which will be completed 1,872,000 days (13 baktuns) after 0.0.0.0.0. This period equals 5,125.36 solar years and is referred to as the Great Cycle of the Long Count (thus the 2012 hype).

Creation Date. The Mayan Anno Mundi used in ancient Mayan long counts was lost in prehistory, and has had to be determined by archaeologist using a combination of logic, radiocarbon dating and astronomical events found in monuments and codices. (as well as consulting tribes who still use some version of it). Currently the most used date is the GMT or Goodman-Martinez-Thompson correlation (3114 BC). Although some archaeologists support the Spinden correlation of 3374 BC, and a handful of others exist going back to the earliest Bowditch correlation of 3634 BC. Also, one must consider the possibility that DIFFERENT kingdoms/cultures used a different creation dates. Given its prevalence in Western calendar history, its very likely that it could have been randomly changed by certain rulers over time. Note that the interesting ancient astronomical section of The book Oahspe puts the ‘end of the age at March 31, 1848 instead of Dec 21 2012, which if true would make the GMT correlation off by 164 years. Early radiocarbon dates at Tikal seemed to match best with the Spinden correlation which was 260 years earlier than the GMT. (add these, as well as list of alternatives with references)

Lets walk through converting the example of 13.0.4.6.17 given in the illustration above. Although an accurate conversion requires converting the whole Long count to days, and then correlating it to the astronomically-based Julian Day Number and then to a Gregorian date from there, note that just adding up the left 3 digit year size gives us 4+0+5200=5204 years. Which added to 3114 BC, gives us 6-17-2090 AD (which is fairly close). But that’s using 360 day years/20 day months and gives a number roughly 70 years off from the true converted date which uses the more precise method of counting days. To get the generally accepted ‘true’ solar date we must, first compute the ‘days’ by multiplying each part by its vigesmal coefficient. So starting at the right of 13.0.4.6.17 we have (17×1)+(6×20)+(4×360)+(0×7200)+(13×144000)= 1,873,577 days [Or conversely using the 5204 from the ‘years’ method explained above (5204×360=1,873,440) + (6×20 + 17 =137) + (1,873,440+137=1,873,577 days)] To get an exact date we’d now convert this ‘Mayan day number’ of days after the Mayan creation date of Aug 11, 3114 BC, to Julian Days which start at 4713 BC (ie. add 1599.6 yrs). Now to get the Julian Day number to a Gregorian date, the math is actually quite complicated and can be found here. But for a rough estimate, one can simply divide the Julian day by 365.24 (1,873,577 days/365.24 days=5129.71 years) then add that to the creation date of Aug 11, 3114 A.M. and it gives us (-3114 + 5129.71 = 2016 AD). To which we then do a bit more complicated match to turn the “.71” into months/days and add it to the “Aug 11”, and it comes out to April 16, 2017. If you’d like to walk through the math try it out here, or better yet, use my Javascript Mayan converter program here.

A few things you should notice if you’ve followed along or played with this in excel, is that if the Mesoamericans used ANY intercalary days it could quickly change the long count by years. (For instance some Mesoamerican cultures might have already added in the 5.24 missing intercalary days so that no conversion is necessary.) For instance, if they just threw in ‘uncounted’ festival days (like the Israelites did) then a given long count date computed the standard way could easily be off by up to 22-36 years (3.25 days in 2500-4000 years = 22-36years). Also the creation date is crucial. And since different scholars and archaeologists have posited creation dates ranging from about 2900 – 3400 BC, then we must admit that any given long count date could also be off by that amount). Although this is where the Tzolkin and the Haab calendars come in.

You can try it our with this calculator: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VvTABETBkEAosUHXUiqwVKa9-wkCuwxzoYDyCiqZ-XA/edit?usp=sharing or https://utahgeology.com/bin/maya-calendar-converter/ 

Since the Long Count is believed to have used 360 instead of 365.24 days and thus NOT have lined up with the sun, moon or seasons, they used other separate calendars to more often track the solar year and moon/Venus rituals.

The Solar Round (Haab): The Haab’ was a number found at the end of many ancient calendar inscriptions. In our illustration it is the right-most part of the Mesoamerican date. Known as the Vague/ true solar year or Haab’ to the Maya, xiuitl to the Aztec, and yza to the Zapotec; it was supposedly based on 18/19 named months, each matched with the 20 days of the month, with a five day period of ‘uncounted days’ tacked on the end (19th month) to make a total 365. It’s thought to be essentially a repetition of the right 2 digits of the Long Count except, since it has a 19th month of 5 ‘unnamed’/intercalary days it accords with the solar year (adding 5+360=365). So the Haab would only fall 0.242 days behind the seasons each year, where the Long Count would fall completely out of sink (5.242days/year). This is typically more useful than the long count, because every culture is more concerned with progress through the year/seasons than days from creation or weeks on a religious calendar.

[Some Thoughts: My main issue with the Haab, is why wouldn’t a culture just started throwing the 5 intercalary days onto the Long Count? Seems awfully laborious to create and keep an essentially redundant unit on your calendar. Could we be mistaken on how it was used? I need to go through all the archaeological long count inscriptions and see how often the Haab/Tzolkin don’t match the Long Count like they should… I think it’s quite prevalent. In these cases either the Ka’tun wheel is being used or there’s something we’re not quite getting yet in these Haab dates.]

————-

The Sacred Round (Tzolkin): Just above the Haab was a date named the Tzolkin by archaeologists. It was a 260-day cycle called the Sacred Round, or the Ritual Calendar; tonalpohualli in the Aztec language, Tzolk’in in Maya, and piye to the Zapotecs. Each day in this cycle was numbered from one to 13 (a trecena), matching with 20-named months (13 × 20 = 260). Note that many call the tzolkin’s 20 named units ‘days’. However, the Aztec Calendar Stone makes it pretty clear that the 20 named units were ‘sacred/religious months’ placed on a 260 day round (which we know from the 52 ‘weeks’ of 5 days labeled on it). Evenso, the exact purpose of the Sacred Round is not understood. Theories include correlating cycles of the moon, 9 months of pregnancy, Venus cycles combined with observations of the Pleiades and eclipse events and potentially appearance and disappearance of Orion. At any rate, it counts out 13 cycles of 20 (months), totaling 260 days or about 9 months (we could call these sacred or religious months like a biblical week). After those 260 days it repeats, adding another 8 sacred ‘months’ of 13 days (8×13=104) to fill up the 105 days of the true year’s 365 days. This then continued into perpetuity aligning with the Haab/solar year once every 52 years. Because of this unique 52 year alignment the combined Tzolkin and Haab dates could be used to specify ONE unique date each 52 years–which is apparently how it was ubiquitously used. (As a coefficient to the Haab to track years instead of days) So a Haab | Tzolkin date like 8 Kab | 13 Pop could be narrowed down to ONE specific day each 52 years.

  • Archaeologist believe the Tzolkin sacred calendar had 20 ‘months’ of 13 days each. So a sacred year was 260 days (13×20=260)
  • 72 cycles (or sacred years) of 260 days = 18,720 days. Which equals 52 Long Count years (of 360 days).
  • 73 cycles (or sacred years of 260 days = 18,980 days, Which equals 52 Haab or true years (of 365 days)

The Short Count or K’atun Round/Wheel: Known also as the “u kahlay katunob“, early records from Diego de Landa (the first Bishop of Yucatan) found in his 1566 Relacion de las Cosas en Yucatan, also talk of another calendar cycle used by the Mayans in which they basically projected the Tzolkin or Sacred Round onto an annual cycle of 260/520 years instead of days. It was a 13 k’atun cycle, which totaled 260 years or 260 tuns (of 365 days each). Each k’atun was named by the tzolk’in day on which it began (or often when it ended). Because the 20 day names of the Tzolk’in are an even divisible of the tun (360 days), a k’atun beginning can only start on an Ahaw day. Thus, the 13 k’atuns of the K’atun Wheel were named 1-13 Ahaw (or Izcalli/Mat in some systems). See page 80 of Morely’s An Introduction to the Study of the Maya Hieroglyphs for more info. A brief explanation can also be found here. You can even find a brief description on the Wikipedia Maya Calendar page (see short count).

An understanding of the Short Count/Katun Round comes from only a few initial authors, and I don’t believe it was always used as they describe. So I’ll attempt to explain the way I think it was used. It seems likely that early in Mesoamerican history (from 600 BC to ~100AD) the tzolkin portion of dates was used as a Katun Wheel tracking years more often than archaeologist realize. For example, the date 8 Kab would be used to say the 8th year of the sacred score Kab instead of 8th day of the sacred month Kab instead of the traditional 8th day of the sacred calendar month Kab. This sacred system of tracking years used 20 cycles (a score) of 13 years each, totaling 260 years. I believe the special ‘variant’ glyphs, commonly seen, were then used for the ‘score’ glyph to double its value extending the systems reach to 520 years. Note also the Aztec Calendar stone and its ‘weeks’ or 52 boxes of 5’s around the center. This is speculated to be 52 ‘weeks’ of 5 days in a sacred round/tzolkin of 260 days which seems like it must have been used as a microcosm for the 52 years of the sacred round aligning with the Long Count. This is a big deal, since Mesoamericans counted by 5s, it means that a date that looks like a tzolkin number telling the day on the sacred calendar could actually be a Katun Round number telling the year in the 52 year Round. This system would explain the dates seen so prevalently in writers like Ixtlilxochitl. Thus:

  • The Haab’ tracked days and months — The Tzolkin sometimes tracked sacred months, but often dualistically used the same notation & symbols/numbers to track the years in a short count of 520 years.
  • Both of these systems used the Tzolkin convention of: day/year | month/sacred cycle or score of years (example: 8 | Kumkʼu)
  • These two numbers/symbols can then be used to track either 260/520 days or 260/520 yrs.
  • ——- first let’s explain the math of the Tzolkin as day tracker ————-
  • 13 days = 1 sacred month
  • 20 sacred months = 1 sacred year (a Tzolkin year) = 260 solar days. (then we repeat)
  • 1 solar year (Haab) = 28+8 sacred months = 1.8 sacred years (tzolkin year)
  • 52 solar years (full sacred cycle) = 72 sacred months
  • ——- now let’s do the Tzolkin as a year tracker ————-
  • 13 Tzolkin years = 1 score of years = 4745 days (13y×365d)
  • 20 Tzolkin years or 1 score = 1 sacred round = 260 solar/Tzolkin years = 94,900 solar Tzolkin days (260×365d)
  • 2 of these cycles gets us to 520 years

So in summary. The Tzolkin/Haab was dualistic. It could count for “days, and months and times/seasons and years” (see Gal 4:10, D&C 121:31, Gen 1:14). The Tzolkin could be a sacred 13day/20month cycle equating to a sacred year of 260 days OR it could be a solar 13year/20score cycle equating to 260 solar years (or doubled to 520 solar years). Note also that the bible might have used a VERY similar system and that what I call ‘scores’ (20 year periods), they call a ‘time’; and that the ‘doubling’ of the time with a ‘variant’ would make it a ‘times’. A convention likely applied to each of the major cycles of 260/520/1040 (coincidentally enough 260+520+1040=1820, the date of the first vision was time, times & half a time after Christ’s birth according to Mesoamerican epochs).

The Year Bearers: Note that many Mesoamerican dates are referenced using the year bearer system. With this system each year was referenced by the Tzolkin coefficient for the first day of the year. Thus since EVERY year starts with the same Haab date of 1 Pop (1 Izcalli) in Aztec, that portion is omitted and only the Tzolkin coefficient is given. So a date like 9 Flint/ Etz’nab’/ Tecpatl, 1 Mat/ Pop/ Izcalli is given as just 9 Flint/ Etz’nab’/ Tecpatl and corresponds to only ONE year in each 52 year sacred round. Note also, as explained here, that many different regions used different starting days for their year bearers at different times, which can make correlating historic dates using the year bearer, very difficult. Of course, this also extends to the sacred round haab/tzolkin date in general—when working with historic dates, these dates can be notoriously inaccurate because of regional changes made to the calendars over time.

Understanding the Three Celestial Cycles: There are three very obvious celestial events which most cultures have used to track time and align celebrations/holidays with and they involve the brightest orbs in our sky; the Sun, the Moon and Venus. We know that the Haab tracked the solar year. But its not fully understood how the tzolkin might have been used to track the Moon & Venus, although its theorized they were.

The first is obviously the solar year. It controls the seasons and thus is the most important. Its length is 365.242 days for the tropical or synodic year (one revolution from equinox to equinox) or 365.256 for the Sidereal year (one revolution in relation to viewing fixed stars or constellations). This cycle controls the length of the day, temperature and seasons, so obviously ancient cultures wanted to commemorate the equinoxes so they knew when summer and winter were coming and going.

Second is the lunar cycle. It controls the tides, fish harvests and possibly even child bearing. One full lunation or lunar cycle as viewed from earth is 29.53 days making each quarter phase last about 7.4 days. Lunar cycles fit into the solar cycle 12.48 times, so it is natural to fit 12 ‘moonths’ into a year. However those 12×29.53 days only equal 354.36 days so we’re left with 10.882 ‘left over’ days where the lunar year grows out of alignment with the solar year. (That’s a bit more than a full month each 3 years! — so more about that later.)

Third is the Venus cycle. Venus is often the most obvious star in the sky because it nearly always either precedes or follows the suns rising and setting. Because of this ‘coupling’ with the sun, its often called the ‘evening and morning star‘ and is represented as a son or bride to the Sun in religion & mythology. (Jesus/Messiah is referred to as the Morning star in 2 Peter 1:19, Job 38:7, Rev 22:16, Num 24:17) It’s cycle or period is usually measured from one of its transits/conjunctions across the sun to another (where it switches from morning star to evening star). A process which takes 584 days (583.92 to be exact). 263 as a morning star, 50 days absent behind the sun/below the horizon, then 263 days as an evening star, and finally, 8 days absent/obscured by solar glare (and sun being at its back) when between the Sun & Earth. See video here. Its raising and setting are tracked by the temples at Teotihuacan and show interesting relationships with the Mesoamerican calendar. Also see the section below titled, ‘Understanding the Venus Cycle’.

Many ancient calendars used similar geometric shapes to visualize celestial mathematical relationships. On the Aztec calendar the sacred round of 260 days. (52 ‘weeks’ of 5 dots/days each) can clearly be seen around the month ring which total 260 total days. These were likely used as a microcosm of a ‘great cycle’ of 260/520 years spoken of by chronologers like Ixtlilxochitl, using the same ‘year for a day’ prophetic calendar found in the bible. See the ‘similarities’ section for how the mayan 520 year cycle might correlate to the Jewish 490 year cycle.

Understanding the Venus Cycle: It is VERY likely the sacred round or Tzolkin tracked the Venus cycle and somehow tied it to the solar (and lunar?) year. As mentioned above, Venus is a “morning or evening star” for approximately 260-263 days each year. Specifically, it spends about 263 days as a morning star (brightly preceding the sun’s rise each morning), then it seems dead, disappearing for 8 days below the horizon, before appearing/resurrecting again as an evening star (trailing the setting sun each night) before catching the sun and spending ~50 days hidden in its light. This gives us 4 important ‘sacred’ numbers. 263, 8, 263 & 50 (=584 days).

Thus 5 synodic periods/orbits of Venus is almost exactly 8 Earth years (& 13 sidereal Venus years). So it lines up 5 times each 8 years, or 15 times each 24 years, 25 times each 40 years 30 times each 48 years and 50 times each 80 years. These periods are VERY handy for a culture that counts by 5’s and 20’s. In relation to the Mayan calendar it lines up 32.5 times in 52 years (13×4), and 65 times (13×5) in 104 years (13×8). And the reason why anyone might want to single out those 52 & 104 years cycles is because they are 1. microcosms of the Venus Transit Cycle, and 2. microcosms of the Great Year.

First, the Venus Transit. A transit of Venus across the Sun takes place when the planet Venus passes directly between the Sun and earth thus becoming visible as a black dot against the solar disk. Much like a solar eclipse of the moon, these transits last several hours and generally occur in a pattern of ‘pairs’ that repeat every 243 years with a pair of transits eight years apart in December (Gregorian calendar) followed by a gap of 121.5 years, then another pair eight years apart in June, followed by another gap, of 105.5 years.

Second, the Great Conjunction. The Great conjunction of Jupiter & the 5 other planets happens every 375/750 years. 7.5×104=750, and 5×104=520??

So lets explore how this might relate to the Sacred Round and or Jubilee. Questions to explore…

  • Do the Jewish spring and fall festivals line up with the spring and fall equinoxes at some point in the 49/52 year Jubilee? (note, this would be latitude specific.) When does the Jubilee line up with Venus’ 50 days in the sun/underworld?
  • Did the Mulekites/Nephites purposefully travel to the same latitude as Jerusalem (31.5 N), or Sanai (28.5) in order to build a city & temple where the calendar matched the Jewish feast/holidays? Did Nephi ‘modify’ the calendar and holy days to fit Monte Alban, and then Mosiah do the same to fit Cholula (so that the sacred round is changed from 59/80/52 in order to work with the equinoxes of those cities?)
  • The feast of weeks (7 weeks after Pentecost) is a microcosm of Jubilee (7 sabbaticals after what?). Is there some correlation here? Might the sabbatical years actually be intended to represent the 7 ‘leap months’ added every 19 years? Might the sabbath day be meant to be a ‘leap day’ which wasnt counted, so that two 14 day ‘weeks’ could actually be 12 days long (matching the months/zodiac)?
  • The Hebrew calendar tracks each 19 years, inserting its leap month 7 times in the 19 years. Leaving 13 years untouched. This seems strangely similar to the Haab and Tzolkin? Could the Haab originally have been 19 year coefficients instead of 18 months? Could the 13 Tzolkin coefficients be related? (unlikely)
  • How does the Oahspe cosmic serpent calendar correlate to the Egyptian/Jewish one? Did they match the cube/sum to the 4 seasons & creation/destruction periods of the Aztec Calendar? Did they match the 7.5 Dan’has to a week? Did they match the 12 squares to the months & zodiac? (chart this on a circle and see if you can make sense of it). Is the 144,000 years of a ‘cube’ supposed to correlate with the 144,000 days of a Baktun (~400 years)? I suspect these are only VERY loosely correlated if at all, the Oahspe calendar being much older, and only partially available to Egypt/Israel. (they were more just trying to match the sacred numbers to their festivals and seasons)

Examples of Mesoamerican Dates

Monte Alban Stelae 12 & 13594 BCE4snake, 8flower and 10jaguar, 4somethinghttps://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.uoregon.edu/dist/7/5151/files/2013/12/DSCF8526-2a7la1b.jpg
Monte Alban Danzante FigureMarch 16, 692?barely legible Haab? of 4-somethinghttps://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.uoregon.edu/dist/7/5151/files/2013/12/DSCF8524-1zlij16.jpg
siteNameGMT (584283) DateLong CountLocation
Chiapa de CorzoStela 2December 6, 36 BCE /
October 9, 182 CE
7.16.3.2.13 or
8.7.3.2.13
Earliest known long count: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/962/flashcards/1362962/jpg/stela2_chiapa_de_corzo-141951102545CAEF8F5.jpg
Takalik AbajStela 2236 – 19 BCE7.(6,11,16).?.?.?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takalik_Abaj#/media/File:Abaj_Takalik_Stela_5.jpg
Tres ZapotesStela CSeptember 1, 32 BCE7.16.6.16.18https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Estela_C_de_Tres_Zapotes.jpg,
https://www.chegg.com/flashcards/o-frontier-and-lf-e63c243b-2544-45b9-8536-25e86eb087b7/deck
El BaúlStela 1March 6? 11 – 37 CE7.18.9.7.12,
7.18.14.8.12,
7.19.7.8.12, or
7.19.15.7.12
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/El_Baul_Stela_1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ElBaulSt.jpg
Takalik AbajStela 5August 31, 83 CE or
May 19, 103 CE
8.2.2.10.15 or
8.3.2.10.1
This interpretation is horrible! Do your own.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abaj_Takalik_Stela_5.jpg
Takalik AbajStela 5June 3, 126 CE8.4.5.17.11https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Takalik_Abaj_Stela_5.JPG
La MojarraStela 1May 19, 143 CE8.5.3.3.5 | glyph-18https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/La_Mojarra_Stela_1_Schematics.jpg/1200px-La_Mojarra_Stela_1_Schematics.jpg (left most date)
La MojarraStela 1July 11, 156 CE8.5.16.9.7 (or 9.9?)Once again, (or) interpretation wrong for some reason… why?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_Mojarra_Estela_1_(Escritura_superior).jpg
Near La MojarraTuxtla StatuetteMarch 12, 162 CE8.6.2.4.17https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/Tuxtla_Statuette.svg/250px-Tuxtla_Statuette.svg.png
TikalStela 29July 8, 292 AD8.12.14.8.15| 13 Men 3 Zip Mexico
CopanStela 15AD 504?Copan has 8+? Stela’s with dates ranging from 504 AD to 761 AD. THIS IS YOUR BEST BET OF DECODING MAYAN DATES.
See https://uncoveredhistory.com/honduras/copan/the-stelae-of-copan/
Read its history at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cop%C3%A1n#Rulers
CopanStela PMarch 623 AD9.9.10.0.0, 2 Ajaw 13 Pophttps://uncoveredhistory.com/honduras/copan/the-stelae-of-copan/attachment/w1067-copan-stela-p-2/
CopanStela N17th March 761AD9.16.10.0.0 1 Ahau 3 Siphttps://uncoveredhistory.com/honduras/copan/the-stelae-of-copan/attachment/w1105-copan-stela-n-side-view-slim-2/
Yaxchilán, Chiapas Lintel 375 July AD 5349.5.0.0.0, 11 Ahaw 8 Sekhttp://research.famsi.org/uploads/montgomery/hires/jm01537yaxlin37.jpg
Piedras NegrasBurial 5July 5, 674 9.12.2.0.16http://www.mesoweb.com/pari/publications/RT06/FourShellPlaques-OCR.pdf (check)
Piedras Negras?9.10.0.??gives Tzolkin on 3 Ajah then 29 days since new moon, 3rd lunation of six (diety), for 30 day lunation with haabof 8 Mol
TikalAlter 14March 16, 692 AD9.13.0.0.0 | 8 Ajaw 8 Wohttp://research.famsi.org/uploads/montgomery/292/image/JM000713TikT1Alt14.jpg
ToninaMonument 101January 15, 909 AD? 10.4.0.0.0. ????https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse4.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.Trbe2hynkEumla1Urmwm6AAAAA%26pid%3DApi&f=1
last Long Count date in the Classic Maya lowlands.
Chichen ItzaInitial Series lintelJuly 28, 87810.2.9.1.9| 9 Muluk 7 Sakhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_Long_Count_calendar#/media/File:Morley_1915_ISglyphs.svg
https://www.jstor.org/stable/275754?seq=1
Chichen ItzaSE PillarMay 6, AD 998 and Jan. 30, AD 998 10.8.10.11.0| 2 Ajaw 18 Mol and 10.8.10.6.4|10 K’an 2 SotzNo Longcount, only solar round date. says. ’10 K’an [the] day, 2 Sotz’, eleventh tun [of K’atun] 2 Ajaw’. Only fit is that date. See great article at:
https://brucelove.com/research/contribution_002/
TortugueroMonument 6December 23, 201213.0.0.0.0 4| Ajaw 3 K’ank’inhttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Estela_6_el_Tortuguero.jpg
La CoronaHS 2, Block VDecember 23, 20123.0.0.0.0 4 Ajaw 3 K’ank’inhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zM2HrRL-BC0/UOChmLSOsjI/AAAAAAAABPI/hfs4jsySyYk/s1600/MNU2012-12-30_04_June-2012_La-Corona_Hieroglyphic-Stairway-2_Block-V_IM-DavidStuart-PRALC-TU.jpg
(more dates here?)
QuiriguaStela CAugust 11, 3114 BCE13.0.0.0.0|4|8https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:East_side_of_stela_C,_Quirigua.PNG, WRONG DATE, CHECK ME!
CobaStela 1December 23, 201213.0.0.0.0 | 4 Ahau 8 KumkʼuPlaces nineteen 13’s before this date for some reason.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Coba-Stela-1-A1-D17-Drawing-COBSt-1-from-Corpus-of-Maya-Hieroglyphic-Inscriptions_fig1_231872337
tons more: link1

Notes Concerning Ancient Calendars from Oahspe

This background information from the text ‘Oahspe’ is very insightful when it comes to making assumptions about possible ancient calendar systems. Of particular note are the ideas that many cultures (like the Israelites) combined the calendars of surrounding cultures in order to create ‘short and long’ count calendars (ie. the ‘prophetic calendars spoken of in other parts of the text). As well as some cultures counting ‘two years’ to the same amount of time that other cultures called ‘one year’ (Note that Ixtlilxochitl does this). As also, its ‘creation cosmology’ is insightful when comparing this type of ancient reasoning to the cosmology we find in Mayan myth and/or ancient books like The Kolbrin.

2. And he placed the sun in the midst and made lines thence to the stars, with explanations of the powers of the seasons on all the living.
3. And he gave the times of Jehovah, the four hundred years of the ancients, and the halftimes of dan, the base [number] of prophecy; the variations of thirty-three years; the times of eleven; and the seven and a half times of the vortices [orbits/frequencies] of the stars, so that the seasons might be foretold, and famines averted on the earth. (Oahspe, Book of Osiris, XII)

Note that the ‘times of eleven’ or variations of thirty-three years (3×11) is tracking the Solar cycles or Solar Max. The well known cycle of 11.01yrs when the sun switches polarity. (apparently 3 of them makes some type of repetitive cycle of solar variability, having to do with Jupiter & Saturn’s orbit and their tidal effects on the sun). The ‘7.5 times of the vortices’ must be something else I’m not aware of. If you know what it is… contact me! (likely some kind of planetary alignment that also includes other planets so the tidal forces of the sun make an even bigger difference). It does seem to match the alignment of Earth & Venus with the Solar Max. Earth & Venus conjunct every 1.5987 earth years (583.92 days), and 6.5 to 7.5 of these equal the Solar Cycle (see this article). Another less likely possibility is that the solar orbit of Venus (sidereal period) is 7.5 earth months (225 days / 30 = 7.5), but since most cultures have different spans for months I’m not sure what that would prove. 7.5 yrs is also the time it takes for Saturn to move through 3 zodiacs (or 1/4 the full 12 or 360 degree celestial equator).

…The times by the learned gave two suns to a year, but the times of the tribes of Eustia gave only six months to a year. Accordingly, in the land of Egypt what was one year with the learned was two years with the Eustians and Semisians.
3.God said: My people shall reckon their times according to the place and the people where they dwell. And they did this. Hence, even the tribes of Israel had two calendars of time, the long and the short.

To events of prophecy there was also another calendar, called the ode, signifying sky-time, or heavenly times. One ode was equivalent to eleven long years; three odes, one spell, signifying a generation; eleven spells one Tuff. Thothma, the learned man and builder of the great pyramid, had said: As a diameter is to a circle, and as a circle is to a diameter (ie. 3.14 or Pi), so are the rules of the seasons of the earth. For the heat or the cold, or the drouth or the wet, no matter, the sum of one eleven years is equivalent to the sum of another eleven years. One spell is equivalent to the next eleventh spell. And one cycle matcheth every eleventh cycle. Whoever will apply these rules to the earth shall truly prophesy as to drouth and famine and pestilence, save wherein man contraveneth by draining or irrigation. And if he apply himself to find the light and the darkness of the earth, these rules are sufficient. For as there are three hundred and sixty-three years in one tuff, so are there three hundred and sixty-three days in one year, besides the two days and a quarter when the sun standeth still on the north and south lines.

In consequence of these three calendars, the records of Egupt were in confusion. The prophecies and genealogies of man became worthless. And as to measurements, some were by threes, some by tens, and some by twelves; and because of the number of languages, the measurements became confounded; so that with all the great learning of the Eguptians, and with all the care bestowed on the houses of records, they became even themselves the greatest confounding element of all. (Oahspe, Book of Arc of Bon, XIV)

So then according to Oahspe section quoted above, the EGYPTIAN CALENDAR was based on the 11 year solar cycle and looked something like this:

1 Ode = 11 long years (full year instead of half year)
3 Odes = 1 Spell (or a generation of likely about 33 years)
11 Spells = 1 Tuff (363 years)

In the verses above it sounds like the Egyptian great year just explained was a microcosm of the solar cycle calendar just explained. So if these great cycles were to mirror a yearly calendar (which they probably did), the calendar would have;

Ode (week) = 11 full days
Spell (month) = 33 days (or 3 weeks of 11 days)
Season = 121 days (or 11 weeks of 11 days, or 3.666 months/spells)
Tuff (year) = 363 days (or 3 seasons or 11 months or 33 weeks)
[Later it appears they changed to 12 months (4×3) of 30 days. see ‘Egyptian Calendar]

“…during the Nineteenth Dynasty and the Twentieth Dynasty the last two days of each decan were usually treated as a kind of weekend for the royal craftsmen, with royal artisans free from work” In other words they added intercalary sabbaths to the Ode/Week which were days of rest. This would have been changed with the Calendar change of Moses. when the distance of the Moon/Planets changed.

4. And from this time forth My spiritual (etherean) hosts shall not remain in heaven (atmospherea) more than eight years in any one cycle. This, then, that I give to thee shall be like every dawn of dan, some of one year, some of two or three or four or more (years), as the time requireth.

5. And thou shalt dwell in thy kingdom seven years and sixty days, and the time shall be called the first dawn of dan, and the next succeeding shall be called the second dawn of dan, and so on, as long as the earth bringeth forth.

6. And the time from one dawn of dan to another shall be called one dan’ha; and four dan’ha shall be called one square, because this is the sum of one density, which is twelve thousand of the earth’s years. And twelve squares shall be called one cube, which is the first dividend of the third space, in which there is no variation in the vortex (whirlwind) of the earth. And four cubes shall be called one sum, because the magnitude thereof embraceth one equal of the Great Serpent. (Oahspe, Book of Ah’shong, II)

Oahspe suggests that the ancients appear to have created ‘Galactic prophetic calendars’, where they extrapolated the short term ratios of a day, week, month, year into cosmic ages. They believed to understand (through revelation) the time it took of the Solar system to orbit the Galactic core, calling it the ‘celestial serpent’ (see Oahspe, ref, ref). The epochs were tied to the 11 year solar cycle, which they believed caused the weather (and other events) to repeat on a 33 or 33×11 year cycle. This formed the basis of their galactic solar cycle calendars.

.

(day)(week)(month)(season)
6 gen.7.5 dans4 dan’ha12 sqrs4 cubes
1 dan1 dan’ha1 square1 cube    1 sum
  • 1 Generation = [could be 11 to 100 years;     ~33 years]
  • 1 Dan = 6 Generations               [33×6= ~198 years] [mean = 400 years]
  • 1 Dan’ha = 7.5 Dans                   [231×7= ~1386 years]      [mean = 3,000 years]
  • 1 Square = 4 Dan’has             [1617×4= 5,544  years]     [mean = 12,000]
  • 1 Cube = 12 Squares                   [6,468×12= 66,528  years]    [mean = 144,000]
  • 1 Sum = 4 Cubes     [77,616×4= 266,112 years] [mean = 576,000]
  • 1 galactic year = 4.7 million years
  • 1 dan = ~428 years (400 years)
  • -about 10,980 dans in a galactic orbit/year. (a lot like an hour in a solar year; there’s 8760hrs/year)
  • -about 391 squares in a galactic year (fairly similar to our 365 days in a solar year)

———————————-

A New Reading of the Zapoteca Mayan Calendar – And Its Possible Association with the Metonic Cycle & Jewish Calendar

It’s still debated whether the Zapotec or Maya were the first to create the Mesoamerican Calendar. In this article we use the term ‘Zapoteca Mayan Calendar’ as a catchall referring to all Mesoamerican Calendars (Aztec, Huestec, Mixtec, etc). The first step to understanding how the Zapoteca Mayan Calendar might be related to the Metonic Cycle (and thus the Jewish Calendar) is to fully understand the current understand of the calendar and how its read. And the first step to understanding the Zapoteca Mayan calendar is to understand our own calendar. 

Deciphering The Zapotec/ Mayan Calendar.

And although you probably feel like you already understand our modern Western calendar, chances are you don’t as well as you need to. so let’s do a refresher real quick because it will make understanding the Zappo Tech on my own calendar much much easier.

Calendars are based on Celestial Cycles, so in order to understand the calendar you need to understand the celestial Cycles that they are based on, and the conjunctions we use to measure them. 

The Day

So to start building our understanding of the Calendar, let’s pretend there was no calendar and you could only use the cycles of nature to keep time. Which ones would you use? The most obvious basic cycle would, of course, be the day and night.  Which is the amount of time it takes for the Sun to go completely around the Earth from the perspective of somebody on Earth.  So lets begin there and use it as the base unit to measure all our other cycles.

The Month

The next largest cycle would likely be the phases of the moon or “moonth.” And there’s actually two cycles that we can measure with the Moon. The first is the amount of time it takes to go from Full Moon to Full Moon. This is called the synodic lunar month, which takes exactly 29.5306 days. And since there are four distinct phases we could break that into four parts of 7.382 days per phase (full, waxing, waning, new). The second lunar cycle we could measure is the amount of time it takes for the moon to make one complete revolution around the Earth, measured in relation to its position against the backdrop of the stars or constellations. This is called the tropical lunar month and it repeats every 27.322 days. It’s a lot harder to see and measure so we probably wouldn’t incorporate it into our calendar until we start to want to get more specific. The first two measurements however, are the basis for our month and week (quarter month).

The Year

After the moon and month the next longest obvious cycle is the annual seasons which dictate when we need to plant our crops. Will call one full spring to Spring a year and measure it out as exactly 365.2422 days. and since there are four distinct seasons just like the four distinct moon phases we could also break them into parts of 91.31 days per season.

The Conjunction 

You might not have realized it, but every time we measure a cycle using another cycle we are actually measuring a conjunction. The month is the conjunction of the Moon cycles and the day cycle. The year is a conjunction between the day cycle and the seasons/year cycle. By understanding conjunctions we start to find ways that we can find larger cycles. for instance the conjunction of the year with the rotation of the planets or other stars.

The Venus Cycle

Venus is one of the most obvious stars in the sky. It is almost always either following or preceding the Sun as it rises and sets in the Spring/Fall. because of that it’s a great way to measure time. One complete cycle of Venus as it chases the Sun catches up to it and then passes it, takes exactly 583.92 days or roughly 19 months. See ‘Understanding the Venus Cycle’ above for a detailed description of how the Venus Cycle relates to the Mayan Calendar.

The Metonic Cycle. 

The next cycle is probably one you haven’t heard about. and yet it is the single most important cycle we’ll be dealing with as we learn about the Mesoamerican calendars. Most calendar’s don’t use this cycle, calendar. Although it is incredibly important to the Jewish calendar in ways we’ll get into later on. The Metonic cycle is the conjunction of the Lunar Synodic Month with the Lunar Tropical Month with the day. In plainer words, it is the number of days it takes for the Moon to return to exactly the same place in the sky (at the same longitude and against the same constellation and thus same solar seasons) with the same phase (full, crescent, new, etc). You could almost consider it a type of lunar ‘great year’, which takes 6,939 days or 235 lunations/synodic months or 19 years to reset (20 if not using zero). Although because its not totally perfect it takes adding a couple more days to make it line up exactly. (Or an extra day each 260 yrs, or a week every 1439 years). This cycle is the basis for our measuring ‘scores’ of years. Although we don’t use this convention often these days, think of the Gettysburg address where it says “four score and seven years ago…” This cycle was used to add extra months to the post exile (and modern) Jewish Calendar (7 months each 20 years). Pre-exile they likely used it to add 18 months every 49 year Jubilee period.

The Great Conjunction

A conjunction of Jupiter & Saturn is called a Great Conjunction. It occurs every 19.86 years. Nearly 5 of the planets align with these two every 258 years (once each 13 Great Conjunctions). This is incredibly relevant to the Mayan Calendar because this may be the only celestial cycle found that makes sense of why the Mayans chose 13, 20’s in the Tzolk’in. By using 20 cycles (months) of 13 days they created a microcosm of the Great Conjunction cycle. So 20×13=260days is a microcosm of 19.86y x 13y=258years when Jupiter, Saturn and often up to 5 planets align. Doubling the 258 years gets us the Full Great Conjunction (which is always 5 planets) of 516.4 years (which is surprisingly close to the Ventury of 520 years of Venus (104*5). It may be that no one else has figured this out, so I plan on writing a paper on it eventually. The Tzolk’in typifies the Great Year, and the Haab typifies the Saros cycle (NOT the Metonic Cycle–the long count tracked that). The two meet up once every 19k years (full precession cycle), but based on written histories it appears they only counted to 520 (much like the Jews) and then restarted the calendar when society fell apart (as it was supposed and prone to do every 520 years according to Ixtlilxochitl!)

Projected Measurements

You might not realize it, but most calendars have the habit of projecting these major celestial cycles upwards and downwards into bigger and smaller cycles where they have no direct celestial basis. For instance, Western calendars project the 12 months of the year onto the day and night, giving it 24 hours in a day. (12 hours per half day.)  And they project the 30 days in a month onto each half hour, giving us our 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute. It’s almost like we turned the “day” into a microcosm of the year and divided that day into units that somewhat match the year. 

Now that we understand all the Mechanics of how a calendar is created, lets look at how we record these cycles in our Western date notations and then use that as a basis to understand the Zapoteca Mayan calendar system.

In the west we typically write out our dates day month name and then your number. although we can just as easily change that order or number out the months instead of giving them names. the important thing to realize though is that just because a placeholder has a certain number of spaces doesn’t mean those spaces are always filled up. For example the month space in a western date has 31 Days for some months but only 28/29 other months. 

[finish this part]

Understanding The Metonic Cycle
The METONIC CYCLE is the Moon’s 19 year cycle where the Moon returns to exactly the same place (at the same longitude and against the same constellation and thus same solar seasons) in the sky with the same phase (full, crescent, new, etc). You could call it a lunar ‘great year’, which takes 6,939 days or 235 lunations/synodic months or 19 years to reset (18.998 years to be exact, but rounded to 19 and 20 if not using zero and counting 1-20 instead of 0-19). Although because the cycle’s conjunction is not a completely whole number, it takes adding a couple more intercalary/holy days to make it line up exactly. (Only an extra day each 260 yrs, or a week every 1439 years).

The Jewish, Greek and Old Babylonian calendars use this cycle to align its months/lunar cycles with the sun every 20th year. They do this by adding a 13th month, 7 times in 19 years, so that on the 20th year, the moon would have the same phase at the same location in the sky (against the backdrop of the stars or hillsides).

Coincidentally, this is nearly a macrocosm of the Venus/lunar conjunction which repeats every 1.59 years or 583.92 days or approximately 19 months. (19 Synodic months is 561.08 days, so there’s a discrepancy of only 22.8 days — see the chart)

Table of Cycle Durations

DayTropical MonthSynodic MonthTropical Year
DayBase unit1/27.321/29.531/365.24
Week7.382 days1/3.701/4.0001/49.47
Tropical Lunar Month27.322 daysBase unit1/1.0801/13.37
Synodic/faze Lunar Month29.5306 days1.080 t.m’sBase unit1/12.37
Tropical Solar Year365.2422 days13.37 t.m’s12.37 monthsBase unit
Synodic Venus Cycle583.92 days21.37 t.m’s (/3 = 7.12)19.773 months1.598 years
Metonic Cycle6,939 days253.97 t.m’s234.98 months18.998 years
Jubilee Cycle17,346 days634.87 t.m’s588 months47.49 years
Meso. Great Year18,992.59 days695.14 t.m’s643.15 months52.x years

In summary:
Tropical Solar Year (365.2422 days)
The Sun returns to the same spot in the sky (against the backdrop of the same constellation)
365.2422 x 19 = 6,939.602 days (every 19 solar years)
Tropical Lunar Month (27.322 days)
The Moon returns to the same spot in the sky (rises/sets or appears against the backdrop of the same constellation)
27.322 x 254 = 6939.788 days (every 254 tropical lunar months)
Synodic Lunar Month (29.5306 days)
The Moon returns to the same phase every 29.5306 days (full, waxing crescent, waning, new)
29.53059 x 235 = 6,939.689 days (every 235 synodic lunar months)
Synodic Venus Cycle (583.92)
Venus returns to the same place in respect to the sun (crosses the sun, or returns to being an evening or morning star) every 583.92 days (or roughly 19 months)
Jewish Jubilee Year (49 lunar years of 354 days each)
The Jewish Jubilee was just a drawn out version of the Metonic cycle, where instead of adding 7 months each 19 years, they brilliantly added 18 months (or 1.5 years) every 49 years instead. The 1.4 years being intercalated time and a Sabbath time of rest and release. It did NOT begin every 49 solar years, but every 49 lunar ‘years‘, (which are 12×29.5306 days long which is 47.5 solar years). A full lunar Jubilee cycle therefore began on day 17,346 days (or 49yrs of 12m x 29.5d). That would put it 531.55 days behind the true solar 49 year period of 17,896.87 days at the beginning of the Jubilee. So to catch up the sacred calendar to the solar one, we need to add 531 days or 18 months. This would miss the true year by only 0.55 days, which means an extra day needs to be added every other Jubilee in addition to the 18 months.

Table of ‘Metonic Cycle’ like intervals where whole months can be added to bring lunar cycle into sync with solar cycle. With the 49 year long Jubilee, we add 18 months or 1.5 ‘lunar years’ every 49 lunar years; so 50.5 lunar years would equal 49 solar years (and only be short .55 days)

So then if one wants to track the captivity of Israel for not keeping the Sabbath. We take those 18 months accrued each Jubilee of 49 lunar/47.5 solar and carry them to a Great Year (490 years) which is 180 months/15 years each 490.

Possible Applications to Mesoamerican Calendars
So then every 19 year Metonic Cycle, the Solar Year & Lunar Phase/Synodic Year are incredibly close to a perfect alignment. Quite similar to how the Lunar Phase & Venus are almost in alignment every 19 month Venus Cycle. So a culture that cares about astronomy might want to incorporate BOTH these cycles of 19 months and 19 years into their calendar, in addition to their cycles tracking the year (since the seasons tell you when to plant), and the month (since it’s the most obvious time keeper in the sky.

One incredibly easy way to track the moon’s 27-29 day cycle through the year is how the West’s Calendar’s do it. With 12 cycles of 4 sets of 7 (4 weeks in a moonth, 12 moonths in a year: 4wx7dx12m=336d). The calendars of western societies are broken into segments meant specifically to track the moon against the sun’s day and year, So they’ve broken the year into 52 lunar phases (weeks), and into 12 lunar phases (months). Other societies have build calendar’s putting emphasis on other celestial cycles created by the movement of various planets or constellations, but up to now, Mesoamerica has been somewhat of an enigma. Scholars can not decide WHY Zapoteca Mayan calendars broke the year into 18’s and 20’s.

However, studying patterns in the Metonic Cycle gives us some possible ideas on how, much like the modern Jewish Calendar, it might be what Mesoamerican’s were tracking with those 18’s and 20 day cycles. The Hebrew lunar year is about 11 days shorter than the solar year and uses the 19-year Metonic cycle to bring it into line with the solar year, with the addition of an intercalary month every two or three years, for a total of 7 added months every 19 years. Multiplying that by seven we get 49 added months every 133 years, which is much like the familiar biblical Jubilee of 7 x 7 months (using added/intercalary months added each 133 years, instead of sequential years). Multiplying that by 10, we get 7 x 70 months equaling 490 added months every 1330 years. (or nearly 40 years worth of months) Which are the calendric number cycles found in Daniel 9:24–27 (seven times seven) and Daniel 12:12, “1335 days”. I bring this up because Zapotec Mayan calendar also has a ‘prophetic’ or ‘sacred’ calendar which might work somewhat similar to Daniel’s biblical one, and the Metonic cycle’s way of adding 7 months to each 19 years actually creates an alternate way of interpreting Daniels prophesy.

[can you add a chart/table to illustrate how this relates?]

Put this in a footnote: [You’ll note the discrepancy between the 1330 years where we need to add 490 months and the 1335 days/years of Daniel 12. Well interesting enough, even with the Metonic cycle intercalation, the average Hebrew calendar year is longer by about 6 minutes and 40 seconds (6.66) than the current mean tropical year, so that every 216 years (~208) the Hebrew calendar will fall a day (29.97hrs) behind the current mean tropical year even after adding the extra months. That means to catch it up, we have to add yet and an extra day every 216 yrs or an extra week every 1330 years. So every 1330 years we add our 490 Jubilee months plus a bit under a week (or ~40 years plus 6 days to be exact) . Also the 1330 year Metonic cycle (where we add 40 years + 1 week) realigns nearly perfectly with the solar year almost exactly once every 3.5 cycles. (times, time + half a time or 3.5 x 365.242 = ~1290 of Dan). So interestingly enough, most of the biblical number of Daniel fit with a Calendar using the Metonic cycle. (And interestingly enough, using this system on Daniel 9:24–27, where we consider a ‘seven’ or hebdomad as a sabbatical or time of adding the extra month about each 2.5 years, then 7 hebdomads (or added weeks which are added 7 times each 19 years) plus sixty two hebdomads [which would be added after 168 years] plus one hebdomad [added after 2.5 years] gives us 189.5 years. Which is EXACTLY the number of years from when Antiochus desecration of the temple in 156 BC to 33 AD with Christs crucifixions.)]

To familiarize people with these complex cycles, ancient cultures often scaled down larger cycles and projected them onto a single year or day. The bible hints to the idea that the Jews did this with their annual festivals. So perhaps to show how the Metonic cycle might factor into the Mayan calendar, lets do the same.

The K’in
To begin with, since we want our ‘day’ to be a microcosm of a year in the metonic cycle we’ll create a cycle of ~19 days, to which instead of adding seven sabbatical months every 19th year we’ll add 7 small scaled segments (like our hours) every 19th day and make that our week of sorts and give it a name like ‘seven nineteens’ to stand for our sabbatical cycle. This is actually strangely close to the Mayan Calendar’s smallest day/week unit called “Uinal” where there are 20 days/Kins, counted 0-19, per Uinal. Is it possible that was the cycle they were tracking? Many might dismiss this possibility since the Mesoamerican day was thought to have 20 days instead of 19, but there’s a couple possible reasons for the discrepancy. First off,18×20=360 is almost identical to 19×19=361, so we might decide to make our months/days 18×20 so we could track the Synodic Venus cycle which has 19.7 (~20) months to a cycle as we scale the calendar up. Secondly, the Uinal might have behaved like a clock where the 12 of the previous cycle is actually the 0 of the current cycle so even though there’s 12 numbers, only 11 of them are counted in the cycle. Proof of this might include how many of the numbers were strangely counted 0-19 days, instead of 1-20 as is typical in calendars.

[Put in a footnote: to track the Metonic cycle in the way the Jewish Sabbatical seems to suggest should be done, we need to track 49 Uinals/Sabbaticals to create a Jubilee as mentioned in Exodus 34:xx. So on our imagined scaled down Calendar we would go to 19 days x 7, which equals 133 days, and again we’d create a calendar break with a new name or holiday and call it Pentecost. (find the Maya holiday here… well, ‘coincidentally’ we do find…)].

The Uinal
After creating our months of 20 days modeled after the Metonic cycle, next we would need to figure out how many of those ‘months fit into a solar year. If we used 19 as the length of our ‘month’ we would need 19 months to fill up the year (19dx19m=361d). But as we discussed, since 20 days is closer to the Venus cycle then we would need 18 months to fill up the year (20×18=360). Additionally if we added our scaled “7 months in 19 years” to our months, it would scale down to 5.5 days after 19 cycles which puts us past our solar year at 366.5 anyway, so then we have to drop our months to the next lower whole digit of 18. And that 18 cycles of 20 day/years = 360 day/years. Which is exactly what the Mayan Calendar has in the Uinal. So now we have a Metonic microcosm calendar with 18 months of 20 days as a scaled down version of a score of Metonic Cycles.

Tun & K’a
Continuing with our scaling exercise we then would likely want to track the actual Metonic cycle of 19 solar years, so we’d want to create a calendar division for 19 year increments. Which the Mayan calendar seems to have in the ‘tun’, which is incredibly close to our needed Metonic cycle. Which once again has a value of 19, counted 0-19 with the zero perhaps belonging to the previous cycles counting.

Finally we’d create one last division since we scaled down the Metonic cycle to create months of 19 days, we will scale up the year to create a ‘Great Year’ of 19 Metonic cycles (somewhat equal to a Sabbatical cycle since we add seven months every 20 years).

So now that we’ve created an imaginary Metonic Calendar, lets summarize it and then make some real world examples to see how it might actually track the Moon’s Metonic cycles and see what kind of intercalary days we might have to add in order for it to make sense.

[add illustration here]

So to summarize.
20/19 days (k’ins) = 1 Metonic microcosm (uinal/month)
18/19 months (uinal) = 1 solar year/tun of 361 days (20 Metonic microcosm days x 18 moonths)
20/19 years (tuns) = 1 true Metonic cycle or Jubilee (katun or score of years)
20/19 sabaticals/ka’tuns = 1 Great Year of 361 years (19yrs x 19 Metonic macrocosm)
13 non-sabbaths occur each 19 months (where we dont add extra time, once every 19 day month) = 1 Jubilee.

Now to track our Metonic Sabbath days/Sabbatical year cycles (remember we add a month 7 times in 19 years in the Metonic cycle) we would probably want to create a secondary sacred calendar to count those sevens… OR just the 13’s left over from the 7’s in the 19/20 year cycles. Because in a Metonic cycle there are 7 intercalary years/days and 13 non-intercalary years/days, and since we are changing the length of the 7 years/days, its simpler math to count the 13’s instead. Now once again this is exactly what we see with the Mayan Sacred Round or Tzolk’in, which counts intervals of 20 and 13 days/years. Now I’m not sure yet whether its trying to count the 13’s, twenty times or the 20’s (actually 19’s), up to thirteen times but I think its doing exactly what the Book of Daniel says.

[UNDER CONSTRUCTION: I need to rewrite this next part. Somehow the 7s and 13s must also track the moon or Venus. Note there are 12.37 synodic months per year, and 13.37 tropical months per year, and perhaps more importantly, 13×5 (65) Venus crossings in 105 years, or 52×5 (260) crossings in 420 years. The reason I think this is ‘more important’ is because the Aztec calendar stone has two inner ring. Once with 13 names, and one with 52 fives. And the Tzolkin sacred round is known to equal 260 (thought to be 13×20 days = 260 days.) So 13mx20 = 52×5 = 260d/y! This is obviously two ways of computing the same sacred round. One of them based on Venus transits, the other is based on lunations/moonths in a year (13).
-So this shows the dual nature of the tzolkin/sacred round being used for a single year (260 days), AND a great year (260 venus xings/420yrs)
-The Haab on the other hand is tracking the 365 day solar year as well as a 365 day Great year With the 19/18 ratios of the Metonic cycle.
-So it shows Metonic Cycle and Venus alignments, with a master alignment occurring every 104/420 years.
-note that when used to track 52 year cycles it SAYS LITTLE astronomically). But when used as great years, it says A LOT.

-IMPORTANT PUZZLE Pieces. 1. The Aztec stone is thought to have 52 periods of 5 (only 38 show), thought to be the 5 unlucky days at the end of each year in the 52 year cycle. BUT, that makes no sense, since the context clearly suggests it should be representing an equal amount of time as the 20 cycles below it (likely suggesting 20 tzolkin cycles?, adding to 260 days/years – And to be fair 13×4 = 52). It also has 7 dots on the headdresses of the two anthropomorphized celestial serpents of the outer ring, suggesting they had a lunar seven cycle in the calendar somewhere. 2. COINCIDENTALLY to the 52 boxes of 5s, there are 5 Jubilees (7, 7s) every 260 days/years, suggesting perhaps they were counting off 5 Jubilee’s (the 50th day/year) every sacred round 245/260 days/years (49×5), or if they added an intercalary day every Jubilee making it 50 days then it brings us to 250 days. (which would be just before Hanukkah/Festival of lights).
-SOO, maybe they added their 5 ‘unlucky days’ by adding one extra day each of the first 5 Jubilees of the year (new years/Passover to Hanukkah). Then tracked those 5 added days/counted Jubilees on the 52 year cycle. Question is… how does this match with the stars/lunar/Metonic cycles?

-The question of why the Sacred round has 260 days is a mystery according to experts. But this above gives a great answer. Its Passover to Hanukah, or the part of the year that tracks the 5 counted Sabbaths and ‘Jubilee’ days.

The book of Daniels gives hints to a Jewish prophetic or sacred calendar which counts in ‘sevens’ (hebdomads) which it translates as ‘weeks’, but are generally translated as “years in sets of seven”. For instance Dan 9:25-x gives the sequence “seventy sevens” which are “seven sets of sevens”, and “62 sets of sevens” and “1 set of sevens”. Generally theologians interpret this as 49 years + 434 years + 7 years. But in our Metonic interpretations we would say a set of seven or Jubilee is actually also 19 years. So 7×19 + 62×19 + 1×19 equals 1330 years. In the case of the Mayan Tzolkin if we use the same logic then perhaps it tracks sets of 7 (19 year periods) up to only 13, equaling 247 years (instead of the traditionally believed 260 (20×13). So how would the number 247 be relevant? This number is coincidentally relevant as the Metonic cycle is equal to 235 synodic months! (235×29.5306/365.24=19yrs) So the Tzolkin calendar seems to be using the microcosm of the Metonic cycle itself yet again. (But I need to figure out how this tells you what Jubilee cycle you are in, for any given date in a 52/104 year period and why anyone would care? Likely because it places you in a great year of some type?). Something like 49×104=5096yrs=cycle of destroyer (or 36×104=3800?) (or 3440 or 3300?)

“He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the year and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of The Destroyer.” (Kolbrin CRT:7:5)]

———–

Perhaps the main calendar Ba’tun counted 19 months of 19 days equaling 361 days. (instead of 19 and 20). This way its a microcosm for the counting of Metonic cycles. But then the sacred round kept track of the sevens (sabbaticals) and 13’s (non-sabbaticals). And maybe for some reason tracking the “what is missing” or the “sabbatical’s that are not” (think Ben Kathryn) was actually easier. So as we count the 7’s and double or half them (7×2=14) or factor them (7×7=49) or tenX them (7×10=70) they build the sacred calendar. Now we factor the second number (7×20=140) or (7×70=490) or (7×100=700).

Some Notes on the Aztec Calendar Stone link1, link2
-The outer ring is composed of 2 anthropomorphized celestial serpents. (with front legs like a Chinese dragon).
-I think there are 52 dots under each serpent/dragon
-Each serpent tail is tied with 4 knots (symbolizing 4 tying of the years in a 52 year period?)
-Each has 5dots just before its rattle, symbolizing?
-The four glyphs in the center surrounding the sun are likely the 4 past ages and 4 seasons (as a microcosm?). Each glyph also has 4 dots (usually in the corners)
-The center likely represents the sun and supreme god.
-The primary circle around the sun has 20 divisions/glyphs. These are separated by 2 lines (perhaps representing 20 as well). These glyphs match the month? day? Ventana? glyphs of the calendar. (To see how these repeated and named the trenchenas read the Wikipedia article here, or John Pratts site here)
-Outside that ring are what look like frills which seem similar to Jewish tzitzit fringes. But their numbers seem obscured. There are 10 then 10 then 10 then 4 on each side. Probably meant to represent 40. (what for?)
-Also obscure are the 3 boxes of 5 (with 3 frills above each), and six fire/water symbols of 4 wiggles each on each side. (Thats 12 water/fires of 4 in the year — thats yet another evidence that they possibly used weeks of 7)

Added Months Every
Metonic Cycle (19yrs)
7 every 19
49 every 133 (doubled = 266, Hanukkah)
50 every (135.71xxx)
62 every 168.28
1 every 2.71 (Dan 70=7+62+1 if hebdomads are sabbaticals)
aka. 70 every 190.0
= 190 (THIS IS THE DAY OF ATONEMENT)
156-189.5 = 33.5 AD. (Antiochus -190=33ad)
490 sabbaths every 1330. (doesn’t really work unless exodus was 1330ish bc)
(7×7=49)+(62×7=434)+(1×7=7) = “70 sevens” of 490 sevens which = 1330 yrs
(49 sabbaticals = 133yrs) + (434 sabbaticals = 1178yrs) + (7 sabbaticals = 19yrs)

Relevant Publications

STILL DO DO: (WHERE I LEFT OF).

  • Still need to find a reference book of ALL archaeological long count date inscriptions and compare them to figure out where they fit in that 520 method I figure out.
  • Replace the long count list/table with a better formatted one (from the spreadsheet I’m building).
  • Then get the Dresden codex and other historical codices and compare those….
  • Find more references to the ’52 weeks’ (of 5 days each) on the Aztec Calendar stone, and the double of 52×10=520.